Mail opening
#2
Account Closed
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,271
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by Chorlton
#3
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,750
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by Angry White Pyjamas
Checking mail entering a country is nothing new. And not restricted to the US either.
Parcels - sure I expect that and have had it done, but letters? Are they looking for prohibited chemicals in the ink on the paper?
#4
Back where I belong!
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Oz to Banbury, England to El Mirage, AZ & now back to England!
Posts: 5,989
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by Chorlton
Parcels - sure I expect that and have had it done, but letters? Are they looking for prohibited chemicals in the ink on the paper?
#5
Wind, earth, fire, water
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by Chorlton
#6
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by User Name
It's always been this way for years so why is this suddenly news? Practice in the UK/USA/France, etc. Incoming mail into a sovereign country has always been subject to inspection - though most times incoming mail is not opened, U.S. Customs (and functionally equivalent agencies - was the same under Carter, Clinton, you name it) has the absolute right to open mail coming into the USA, the UK etc., same goes for UK Customs or its functional equivalent. UK Customs has the absolute right to check incoming mail, packages, baggage, containers, etc. etc. Though most times UK Customs have no interest in opening mail, they can do so, likewise for packages, baggage, containers, even EU citizens can have their cars searched entering and leaving the UK without a warrant and without probable cause. My sister's car was stopped for a random search with guys in white overalls before leaving the UK, and she had a new baby, a slightly older child, loads of baby stuff for changing baby, all packed into the back of the car. She demanded that they put it all back the way it was. Just a random search, and it happened to be her car, and she is a British and EU citizen leaving the UK for France, another EU country. So I don't get this "news" story at all.
Like they say, perception is more important than reality
#7
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,577
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by ironporer
The tapping if phone calls and emails of international origin without a warrant ALSO has been done for years- done by Clinton all the way back to Carter.... but now that Bush continues to do it, we have a big scandel. Amazing how this is not being reported by the big 4 news chains.
Like they say, perception is more important than reality
Like they say, perception is more important than reality
#8
Wind, earth, fire, water
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by anotherlimey
Um not sure if they did it without judicial approval though.
#9
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,577
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by User Name
So UK's GCHQ applies for a warrant before it eavesdrops on satellite communications or on Embassy comm traffic? Did the UK get warrants when they listened to comms traffic into the UK from Libya? How come the UK security services knew about the Libyan trawler supplying weapons to the IRA absent such eavesdropping? Didn't the UK security services bug public telephone boxes? Wasn't that how they caught some IRA terrorists? Anyone can walk into a public telephone box and their conversations would be recorded, how relevant is a warrant for such activities when you don't know in advance who might use the public telephone box given that Joe public use the same box? This was a tactic used by UK security services on a routine basis for a long long time.
Here in the US, the government doesn't need a warrant to listen to foreign spies, but it does to listen to its own citizens.
Echelon is an automated system, not a conventional wiretap.
#10
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by User Name
So UK's GCHQ applies for a warrant before it eavesdrops on satellite communications or on Embassy comm traffic? Did the UK get warrants when they listened to comms traffic into the UK from Libya? How come the UK security services knew about the Libyan trawler supplying weapons to the IRA absent such eavesdropping? Didn't the UK security services bug public telephone boxes? Wasn't that how they caught some IRA terrorists? Anyone can walk into a public telephone box and their conversations would be recorded, how relevant is a warrant for such activities when you don't know in advance who might use the public telephone box given that Joe public use the same box? This was a tactic used by UK security services on a routine basis for a long long time.
#11
Wind, earth, fire, water
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by britontour
Your right things like this have been going on for years, I think the big difference is if it becomes ok (law) to listen into anyone's phone calls without a warrant then they could start monitoring people on a bigger scale and using the gained information for their own purposes, this could be political or business information for example.
#12
Wind, earth, fire, water
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by anotherlimey
Listening to conversations of foreign powers is different from listening to your own citizen's conversations.
Here in the US, the government doesn't need a warrant to listen to foreign spies, but it does to listen to its own citizens.
Echelon is an automated system, not a conventional wiretap.
Here in the US, the government doesn't need a warrant to listen to foreign spies, but it does to listen to its own citizens.
Echelon is an automated system, not a conventional wiretap.
#13
Account Closed
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,220
Re: Mail opening
Read Peter Wrights "Spycatcher' and you'll know that the UK has been doing this since BEFORE WW2.
#14
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,577
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by User Name
Excuse me, but IRA terrorists were often British citizens. Are you saying it was wrong of the UK security services to listen in to an IRA (British citizen) master of arms using a public telephone box to take down orders for x number of "cooked dinners", "pasties", etc. from IRA units operating in England? You mean to say you really didn't know that many of the IRA terrorists were British citizens. Wow!
If they are a suspected terrorist, then they [law enforcement] can easily get a warrant for it.
Like the US, in the UK different laws govern different types of suspect.
In fact, why did you bring up the UK laws, I never mentioned them?
#15
Wind, earth, fire, water
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
Re: Mail opening
Originally Posted by rushman
Read Peter Wrights "Spycatcher' and you'll know that the UK has been doing this since BEFORE WW2.