Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

Mail opening

Mail opening

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 10th 2006, 6:44 pm
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,750
Chorlton is an unknown quantity at this point
Exclamation Mail opening

http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/news...archived=False
Chorlton is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 6:50 pm
  #2  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,271
Angry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to beholdAngry White Pyjamas is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Mail opening

Checking mail entering a country is nothing new. And not restricted to the US either.
Angry White Pyjamas is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 6:55 pm
  #3  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,750
Chorlton is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by Angry White Pyjamas
Checking mail entering a country is nothing new. And not restricted to the US either.

Parcels - sure I expect that and have had it done, but letters? Are they looking for prohibited chemicals in the ink on the paper?
Chorlton is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 7:23 pm
  #4  
Back where I belong!
 
Partystar's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Oz to Banbury, England to El Mirage, AZ & now back to England!
Posts: 5,989
Partystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond reputePartystar has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by Chorlton
Parcels - sure I expect that and have had it done, but letters? Are they looking for prohibited chemicals in the ink on the paper?
Maybe they're getting bored with all their soap operas & are looking for something steamy to read about!!!
Partystar is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 7:51 pm
  #5  
Wind, earth, fire, water
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
User Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

It's always been this way for years so why is this suddenly news? Practice in the UK/USA/France, etc. Incoming mail into a sovereign country has always been subject to inspection - though most times incoming mail is not opened, U.S. Customs (and functionally equivalent agencies - was the same under Carter, Clinton, you name it) has the absolute right to open mail coming into the USA, the UK etc., same goes for UK Customs or its functional equivalent. UK Customs has the absolute right to check incoming mail, packages, baggage, containers, etc. etc. Though most times UK Customs have no interest in opening mail, they can do so, likewise for packages, baggage, containers, even EU citizens can have their cars searched entering and leaving the UK without a warrant and without probable cause. My sister's car was stopped for a random search with guys in white overalls before leaving the UK, and she had a new baby, a slightly older child, loads of baby stuff for changing baby, all packed into the back of the car. She demanded that they put it all back the way it was. Just a random search, and it happened to be her car, and she is a British and EU citizen leaving the UK for France, another EU country. So I don't get this "news" story at all.
User Name is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 8:00 pm
  #6  
Maño-Americano
 
ironporer's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: In the heart of the Ozarks
Posts: 10,216
ironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond reputeironporer has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by User Name
It's always been this way for years so why is this suddenly news? Practice in the UK/USA/France, etc. Incoming mail into a sovereign country has always been subject to inspection - though most times incoming mail is not opened, U.S. Customs (and functionally equivalent agencies - was the same under Carter, Clinton, you name it) has the absolute right to open mail coming into the USA, the UK etc., same goes for UK Customs or its functional equivalent. UK Customs has the absolute right to check incoming mail, packages, baggage, containers, etc. etc. Though most times UK Customs have no interest in opening mail, they can do so, likewise for packages, baggage, containers, even EU citizens can have their cars searched entering and leaving the UK without a warrant and without probable cause. My sister's car was stopped for a random search with guys in white overalls before leaving the UK, and she had a new baby, a slightly older child, loads of baby stuff for changing baby, all packed into the back of the car. She demanded that they put it all back the way it was. Just a random search, and it happened to be her car, and she is a British and EU citizen leaving the UK for France, another EU country. So I don't get this "news" story at all.
The tapping if phone calls and emails of international origin without a warrant ALSO has been done for years- done by Clinton all the way back to Carter.... but now that Bush continues to do it, we have a big scandel. Amazing how this is not being reported by the big 4 news chains.

Like they say, perception is more important than reality
ironporer is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 8:05 pm
  #7  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,577
anotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by ironporer
The tapping if phone calls and emails of international origin without a warrant ALSO has been done for years- done by Clinton all the way back to Carter.... but now that Bush continues to do it, we have a big scandel. Amazing how this is not being reported by the big 4 news chains.

Like they say, perception is more important than reality
Um not sure if they did it without judicial approval though.
anotherlimey is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 9:59 pm
  #8  
Wind, earth, fire, water
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
User Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by anotherlimey
Um not sure if they did it without judicial approval though.
So UK's GCHQ applies for a warrant before it eavesdrops on satellite communications or on Embassy comm traffic? Did the UK get warrants when they listened to comms traffic into the UK from Libya? How come the UK security services knew about the Libyan trawler supplying weapons to the IRA absent such eavesdropping? Didn't the UK security services bug public telephone boxes? Wasn't that how they caught some IRA terrorists? Anyone can walk into a public telephone box and their conversations would be recorded, how relevant is a warrant for such activities when you don't know in advance who might use the public telephone box given that Joe public use the same box? This was a tactic used by UK security services on a routine basis for a long long time.
User Name is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 10:03 pm
  #9  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,577
anotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by User Name
So UK's GCHQ applies for a warrant before it eavesdrops on satellite communications or on Embassy comm traffic? Did the UK get warrants when they listened to comms traffic into the UK from Libya? How come the UK security services knew about the Libyan trawler supplying weapons to the IRA absent such eavesdropping? Didn't the UK security services bug public telephone boxes? Wasn't that how they caught some IRA terrorists? Anyone can walk into a public telephone box and their conversations would be recorded, how relevant is a warrant for such activities when you don't know in advance who might use the public telephone box given that Joe public use the same box? This was a tactic used by UK security services on a routine basis for a long long time.
Listening to conversations of foreign powers is different from listening to your own citizen's conversations.

Here in the US, the government doesn't need a warrant to listen to foreign spies, but it does to listen to its own citizens.

Echelon is an automated system, not a conventional wiretap.
anotherlimey is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 10:18 pm
  #10  
The American Job
 
britontour's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 579
britontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond reputebritontour has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by User Name
So UK's GCHQ applies for a warrant before it eavesdrops on satellite communications or on Embassy comm traffic? Did the UK get warrants when they listened to comms traffic into the UK from Libya? How come the UK security services knew about the Libyan trawler supplying weapons to the IRA absent such eavesdropping? Didn't the UK security services bug public telephone boxes? Wasn't that how they caught some IRA terrorists? Anyone can walk into a public telephone box and their conversations would be recorded, how relevant is a warrant for such activities when you don't know in advance who might use the public telephone box given that Joe public use the same box? This was a tactic used by UK security services on a routine basis for a long long time.
Your right things like this have been going on for years, I think the big difference is if it becomes ok (law) to listen into anyone's phone calls without a warrant then they could start monitoring people on a bigger scale and using the gained information for their own purposes, this could be political or business information for example.
britontour is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 10:26 pm
  #11  
Wind, earth, fire, water
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
User Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by britontour
Your right things like this have been going on for years, I think the big difference is if it becomes ok (law) to listen into anyone's phone calls without a warrant then they could start monitoring people on a bigger scale and using the gained information for their own purposes, this could be political or business information for example.
I don't think anyone is advocating that. The issue is protecting the people against terrorist activities post 9-11, I don't think listening to everyone's phone conversations will aid in that goal. The monitoring is obviously selective, there's no point in wasting resources on listening to a grandma talking to her grandchild.
User Name is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 11:03 pm
  #12  
Wind, earth, fire, water
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
User Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by anotherlimey
Listening to conversations of foreign powers is different from listening to your own citizen's conversations.

Here in the US, the government doesn't need a warrant to listen to foreign spies, but it does to listen to its own citizens.

Echelon is an automated system, not a conventional wiretap.
Excuse me, but IRA terrorists were often British citizens. Are you saying it was wrong of the UK security services to listen in to an IRA (British citizen) master of arms using a public telephone box to take down orders for x number of "cooked dinners", "pasties", etc. from IRA units operating in England? You mean to say you really didn't know that many of the IRA terrorists were British citizens. Wow!
User Name is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 11:04 pm
  #13  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,220
Rushman is just really niceRushman is just really niceRushman is just really niceRushman is just really niceRushman is just really niceRushman is just really niceRushman is just really niceRushman is just really niceRushman is just really nice
Default Re: Mail opening

Read Peter Wrights "Spycatcher' and you'll know that the UK has been doing this since BEFORE WW2.
Rushman is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 11:21 pm
  #14  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,577
anotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond reputeanotherlimey has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by User Name
Excuse me, but IRA terrorists were often British citizens. Are you saying it was wrong of the UK security services to listen in to an IRA (British citizen) master of arms using a public telephone box to take down orders for x number of "cooked dinners", "pasties", etc. from IRA units operating in England? You mean to say you really didn't know that many of the IRA terrorists were British citizens. Wow!
I'm not saying that.

If they are a suspected terrorist, then they [law enforcement] can easily get a warrant for it.

Like the US, in the UK different laws govern different types of suspect.

In fact, why did you bring up the UK laws, I never mentioned them?
anotherlimey is offline  
Old Jan 10th 2006, 11:22 pm
  #15  
Wind, earth, fire, water
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: DC metro area
Posts: 1,670
User Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond reputeUser Name has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Mail opening

Originally Posted by rushman
Read Peter Wrights "Spycatcher' and you'll know that the UK has been doing this since BEFORE WW2.
... and in more modern times the French secret service section routinely bugged the seats in first class on Air France. No warrant for that one. It is also well-known that the French secret service did not like Green Peace.
User Name is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.