Help wanted WW2!
#331
Bloody Yank









Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,186
From: USA! USA!











Again, nuance ain't yer bag, I guess.
I suppose that if you haven't yet figured it out after 300+ posts and numerous explanations that you aren't likely to figure it out with yet another explanation, are you?
I suppose that if you haven't yet figured it out after 300+ posts and numerous explanations that you aren't likely to figure it out with yet another explanation, are you?
#332
Account Closed



Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 202

I usually retort "If it wasn't for the British, you would all be speaking Spanish"

We will never surrender.....Winston Churchill.
Fastest way to make the Americans annoyed.....hang up a Union Jack and set fire to that stripey tablecloth of a rag they call stars and stripes
#333
Position - Offside




Joined: May 2005
Posts: 413
From: Harvest, Alabama from Newport Pagnell, Bucks/Mitcham, Surrey











#334
I quite agree! The Yanks didn't enter till 1917 and 1941.
I usually retort "If it wasn't for the British, you would all be speaking Spanish"

We will never surrender.....Winston Churchill.
Fastest way to make the Americans annoyed.....hang up a Union Jack and set fire to that stripey tablecloth of a rag they call stars and stripes
I usually retort "If it wasn't for the British, you would all be speaking Spanish"

We will never surrender.....Winston Churchill.
Fastest way to make the Americans annoyed.....hang up a Union Jack and set fire to that stripey tablecloth of a rag they call stars and stripes
" stripey tablecloth of a rag", I don't think so.
#335
I quite agree! The Yanks didn't enter till 1917 and 1941.
I usually retort "If it wasn't for the British, you would all be speaking Spanish"

We will never surrender.....Winston Churchill.
Fastest way to make the Americans annoyed.....hang up a Union Jack and set fire to that stripey tablecloth of a rag they call stars and stripes
I usually retort "If it wasn't for the British, you would all be speaking Spanish"

We will never surrender.....Winston Churchill.
Fastest way to make the Americans annoyed.....hang up a Union Jack and set fire to that stripey tablecloth of a rag they call stars and stripes
#336
Does medical insurance normally cover a room with an internet connection then?
#339
Account Closed










Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,220









Clearly, Vietnam was not a military defeat...
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
Vietnam was a loss.
Nevermind all that "nuance" bullshit. You've made 2 different statements here in 2 seperate posts. Earlier in the thread you claimed that Vietnam was NOT a loss but here you are calling it that very word?
Are you on medication?
Try to reply without hiding behind the word "nuance".
#340
Thread Starter
Ivegotta Member





Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 900
From: Atlanta











Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
Clearly, Vietnam was not a military defeat...
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
Vietnam was a loss.
Nevermind all that "nuance" bullshit. You've made 2 different statements here in 2 seperate posts. Earlier in the thread you claimed that Vietnam was NOT a loss but here you are calling it that very word?
Are you on medication?
Try to reply without hiding behind the word "nuance".
Clearly, Vietnam was not a military defeat...
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
Vietnam was a loss.
Nevermind all that "nuance" bullshit. You've made 2 different statements here in 2 seperate posts. Earlier in the thread you claimed that Vietnam was NOT a loss but here you are calling it that very word?
Are you on medication?
Try to reply without hiding behind the word "nuance".
Rob
#341
Bloody Yank









Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,186
From: USA! USA!











Am I missing the joke, that this is some elaborate pisstake that you've orchestrated deliberately to make yourself looking dimmer than a broken lightbulb?
I realize that it takes all kinds to make an Internet, but I find it hard to believe that you seem to actually be proud of carting around a black-and-white simplistic worldview that you mistake for thought.
I think that I've covered ad nauseum that is possible to achieve military gains but suffer political losses simultaneously, and that blowing stuff up in a grandiose fashion does not always lead to a political win, despite what the right-wingers may claim. Unless you become able to illustrate some ability to actually comprehend the argument, I won't be bothered to explain it again.
I realize that it takes all kinds to make an Internet, but I find it hard to believe that you seem to actually be proud of carting around a black-and-white simplistic worldview that you mistake for thought.
I think that I've covered ad nauseum that is possible to achieve military gains but suffer political losses simultaneously, and that blowing stuff up in a grandiose fashion does not always lead to a political win, despite what the right-wingers may claim. Unless you become able to illustrate some ability to actually comprehend the argument, I won't be bothered to explain it again.
#343
Account Closed










Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,220









Am I missing the joke, that this is some elaborate pisstake that you've orchestrated deliberately to make yourself looking dimmer than a broken lightbulb?
I realize that it takes all kinds to make an Internet, but I find it hard to believe that you seem to actually be proud of carting around a black-and-white simplistic worldview that you mistake for thought.
I think that I've covered ad nauseum that is possible to achieve military gains but suffer political losses simultaneously, and that blowing stuff up in a grandiose fashion does not always lead to a political win, despite what the right-wingers may claim. Unless you become able to illustrate some ability to actually comprehend the argument, I won't be bothered to explain it again.
I realize that it takes all kinds to make an Internet, but I find it hard to believe that you seem to actually be proud of carting around a black-and-white simplistic worldview that you mistake for thought.
I think that I've covered ad nauseum that is possible to achieve military gains but suffer political losses simultaneously, and that blowing stuff up in a grandiose fashion does not always lead to a political win, despite what the right-wingers may claim. Unless you become able to illustrate some ability to actually comprehend the argument, I won't be bothered to explain it again.
#344
Account Closed










Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,455

Win or lose - that's pretty black and white.
"Good news, sir. We're winning the defeat!"
"Good news, sir. We're winning the defeat!"
Last edited by Sally; Sep 27th 2007 at 5:02 pm.



