Texas

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 7th 2017, 5:47 pm
  #46  
Concierge
 
spouse of scouse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 21,156
spouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond reputespouse of scouse has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by Boiler
3rd Rifle at the moment, one of those would have been illegal to use, not sufficient stopping power for a good kill.
What's a 'good kill'?
spouse of scouse is offline  
Old Nov 7th 2017, 5:55 pm
  #47  
 
Lion in Winter's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: East Seaxe
Posts: 72,593
Lion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by Octang Frye
People rag about the NRA being this powerhouse of influence spending hundreds of millions on behalf of gun manufacturers.

The reality is the "power" such as it is, derives from its 5 million members, who are passionate about their firearm ownership. The NRA spent less than $4 million in the last election.

The Democrats just use it as the evil behemoth.

I'm not a member myself because I hear they bombard you solicitations and junk mail.
Ah the power of the carefully chosen statistic. How would you define "spent in the last election" vs just "spent"? And what difference do you think it might make?


This is from 2014. Look at all three categories. Because I believe you only picked one there for your post.

How Loaded is the Gun Lobby? | Gunned Down: The Power of the NRA | FRONTLINE | PBS | Official Site

Alternatively (or as well), read this. They seem to have a different dollar amount from the one you posted, among other things.

http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-p...ontrol-2017-10




I am sure the NRA has "grassroots" support, however. That's what marketing campaigns achieve. I know, I work in marketing. And the national gun/freedom myth is nothing if not a marketing campaign.

Last edited by Lion in Winter; Nov 7th 2017 at 6:05 pm.
Lion in Winter is offline  
Old Nov 7th 2017, 9:01 pm
  #48  
Peace onion
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Octang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

You are a lying liar of lies, sitting atop your throne of lies. In a lieberry.

Last edited by Octang Frye; Nov 7th 2017 at 9:10 pm.
Octang Frye is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 1:19 am
  #49  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Giantaxe is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 4:47 pm
  #50  
Peace onion
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Octang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond reputeOctang Frye has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Giantaxe, you forget #6 - Plaster killers face all TV and newspaper front-pages. Ignore victims.

I walked into work today and the flag was (depressingly) flying at half mast again.
I was momentarily confused as to why, and then I remembered.
Octang Frye is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 4:49 pm
  #51  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by Octang Frye
Giantaxe, you forget #6 - Plaster killers face all TV and newspaper front-pages. Ignore victims.
Odd, the NY Times "plastered" the face of each known victim of the Las Vegas massacre in a montage, along with descriptions of the life of many of them. Maybe you should read a better quality newspaper?
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 7:58 pm
  #52  
Concierge
 
Rete's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 46,400
Rete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by spouse of scouse
What's a 'good kill'?
Assume it is a clean shot/kill meaning one bullet kills instantly.
Rete is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 9:33 pm
  #53  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by Rete
Assume it is a clean shot/kill meaning one bullet kills instantly.
Sorry missed this, but basically that, quick kill, does not disappear wounded into the forest. Apart from anything else you could be trailing it for a very long time and then have the issue of getting it out.
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 9:45 pm
  #54  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
dakota44's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Posts: 27,078
dakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by Rete
Assume it is a clean shot/kill meaning one bullet kills instantly.
A little over simplification there. Death is determined by where the bullet strikes and in the case of an AR15 type weapon..how it cavitates.

Last edited by dakota44; Nov 8th 2017 at 10:03 pm.
dakota44 is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 10:02 pm
  #55  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
dakota44's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Posts: 27,078
dakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by Boiler
Sorry missed this, but basically that, quick kill, does not disappear wounded into the forest. Apart from anything else you could be trailing it for a very long time and then have the issue of getting it out.
You seemingly know nothing about the damage an AR15 does. Everyone in my unit much preferred that if they were shot in combat...let it be by an AK and not an M16. We saw the damage it did and how lethal it was...much more so than an AK. Any battlefield medic or surgeon would be happy to enlighten you
dakota44 is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 10:05 pm
  #56  
BE Forum Addict
 
BenK91's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Location: Denver, CO.
Posts: 1,523
BenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by Boiler
Sorry missed this, but basically that, quick kill, does not disappear wounded into the forest. Apart from anything else you could be trailing it for a very long time and then have the issue of getting it out.
Not to mentioned the ruined meat!
BenK91 is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 10:06 pm
  #57  
BE Forum Addict
 
BenK91's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Location: Denver, CO.
Posts: 1,523
BenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by dakota44
You seemingly know nothing about the damage an AR15 does. Everyone in my unit much preferred that if they were shot in combat...let it be by an AK and not an M16. We saw the damage it did and how lethal it was...much more so than an AK. Any battlefield medic or surgeon would be happy to enlighten you
You're saying a .223/.556 is the worst caliber round to get shot by...?

I've certainly heard otherwise.

Last edited by BenK91; Nov 8th 2017 at 10:09 pm.
BenK91 is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 11:48 pm
  #58  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
dakota44's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Posts: 27,078
dakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by BenK91
You're saying a .223/.556 is the worst caliber round to get shot by...?

I've certainly heard otherwise.
I am With first hand knowledge, correcting another posters false view of the AR15's killing power. It has to do with a light weight projectile combined with a very high muzzle velocity. It can pulverize bone and the bullet itself can fragment sending dozens of shrapnel like fragments far from the initial wound, or it can deflect and travel from' for example, your thigh to your torso. Hitting fleshy material it causes high cavitation that damages arteries or organs. The cavitation when it hits an organ can turn the organ to mush. Do you really think the military would use it if it were not as deadly as hell.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.wire...can-human-body

Last edited by dakota44; Nov 9th 2017 at 12:18 am.
dakota44 is offline  
Old Nov 8th 2017, 11:55 pm
  #59  
BE Forum Addict
 
BenK91's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Location: Denver, CO.
Posts: 1,523
BenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond reputeBenK91 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

I'm just curious. My brother in law who works in the operating theater seems to say a .22 is significantly worse due to how badly it fragments, apparently on a completely different level to a .223

Obviously a .22 and a .223/.556 is a completely different round but it's just interesting to hear the two compared from a medical point of view.
BenK91 is offline  
Old Nov 9th 2017, 12:15 am
  #60  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,448
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Texas

Originally Posted by dakota44
I am With first hand knowledge. It has to do with a light weight projectile combined with a very high muzzle velocity. It can pulverize bone and the bullet itself can fragment sending dozens of shrapnel like fragments far from the initial wound, or it can deflect and travel from' for example, your thigh to your torso. Hitting fleshy material it causes high cavitation that damages arteries or organs. The cavitation when it hits an organ can turn the organ to mush. Do you really think the military would use it if it were not as deadly as hell. ....


Are you talking about military ammo, or civilian ammo?

The military are prohibited from using fragmenting bullets in war, because of their extreme lethality, whereas fragmenting bullets are mandatory for hunting and are therefore ubiquitous in the civilian market. Therefore the problem of "military grade weapons" in civilian hands is greatly exacerbated by the ammunition most widely available being ammo designed for its efficacy in killing deer.
Pulaski is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.