![]() |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 13209425)
When in Florida, keep a diet soda handy at all times. You never know when you might need to destroy DNA evidence
https://www.aol.com/news/florida-wom...112133647.html |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Woman wanted her three year old son killed - preferably by the end of the week. And she was prepared to pay $3,000!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...bsite-kill-son |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 13212873)
Woman wanted her three year old son killed - preferably by the end of the week. And she was prepared to pay $3,000!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...bsite-kill-son |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
|
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66900530
This story is very concerning. Do children have no rights & freedoms in Florida? Their mother could just deprive them of their electronic devices with impunity? |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 13217826)
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66900530
This story is very concerning. Do children have no rights & freedoms in Florida? Their mother could just deprive them of their electronic devices with impunity? |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by spouse of scouse
(Post 13217827)
Dreadful. Next she'll be making them eat vegetables, which has rights and freedoms implications for both the children and the veggies.
|
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 13217831)
Yeah, broccoli. Ugh. The story was heartwarming though. The big sister was supervising, to make sure baby brother was driving safely.
Joking aside, that was a hell of a journey. Amazing that they made it that far without pranging the car. Extended ban on electronic devices incoming. |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by spouse of scouse
(Post 13217835)
:lol:
Joking aside, that was a hell of a journey. Amazing that they made it that far without pranging the car. Extended ban on electronic devices incoming. |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
I know this thread is more about pointing at Florida and laughing and it might not seem appropriate to post six people, including five family members, killed after train hits car but I'm amazed at the description of the crossing.
The crossing lacked gates or a warning bell and was only equipped with a stop sign as well as a railroad crossing sign. It's a very recent 'view' and approaching from this direction it's not very obvious there's a railway crossing until you're close. Approaching from the other side it's much more obvious as you can see the crossing signs, the warning signs about not stopping on the tracks (the backs are only visible from the first view) and a couple of big Xs on the road surface before you get to the tracks. And the barriers sticking up are more visible. But the report only says signs. I changed the dates but there were none with barriers down or a train in view. Astonishingly, going back to 2008 it looked even worse. |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13217850)
I know this thread is more about pointing at Florida and laughing and it might not seem appropriate to post six people, including five family members, killed after train hits car but I'm amazed at the description of the crossing.
I found another report that references Highway 92 and I think I found the crossing here. It's a very recent 'view' and approaching from this direction it's not very obvious there's a railway crossing until you're close. Approaching from the other side it's much more obvious as you can see the crossing signs, the warning signs about not stopping on the tracks (the backs are only visible from the first view) and a couple of big Xs on the road surface before you get to the tracks. And the barriers sticking up are more visible. But the report only says signs. I changed the dates but there were none with barriers down or a train in view. Astonishingly, going back to 2008 it looked even worse. In the UK (and Europe), the attitude is we must prevent idiots from putting themselves in harms way, whereas, the US attitude is if you do stupid s#!t, you deserve all you get. Hence, in the UK, every single mile of railways are fenced off. Very few railways in the US are fenced. As an example, in the UK where we used to live, there was a gate-controlled level crossing just outside the village. One day, an idiot tried to beat the train by swerving round the barriers. The train won! Following that incident they built a flyover at vast expense and shut down the crossing. Most (not all) states have laws requiring bikers to wear crash helmets, but they are rarely enforced. It's a self-regulating law. Don't wear a helmet, get in an accident, problem solved. Another example is HGV trailers in the UK/Europe are required to have side/rear rails to prevent cars driving under the trailer. Not required over here. |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by chawkins99
(Post 13217873)
Something we discovered very quickly after moving to the US over 20 years ago was the difference in attitude toward public safety.
In the UK (and Europe), the attitude is we must prevent idiots from putting themselves in harms way, whereas, the US attitude is if you do stupid s#!t, you deserve all you get. Hence, in the UK, every single mile of railways are fenced off. Very few railways in the US are fenced. As an example, in the UK where we used to live, there was a gate-controlled level crossing just outside the village. One day, an idiot tried to beat the train by swerving round the barriers. The train won! Following that incident they built a flyover at vast expense and shut down the crossing. Most (not all) states have laws requiring bikers to wear crash helmets, but they are rarely enforced. It's a self-regulating law. Don't wear a helmet, get in an accident, problem solved. Another example is HGV trailers in the UK/Europe are required to have side/rear rails to prevent cars driving under the trailer. Not required over here. https://www.appellawyer.com/blog/sem...er-regulations |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 13217879)
I think it's not just a direct disregard for public safety, but is testament that the US "has the best political system money can buy". Thus railroads can us lobbying $$$ to successfully prevent laws that require fencing and replacement of the thousands of dangerous level crossings with bridges. Ditto the truck lobby who prevented law changes to require side and front bars. The UK also used to have a huge number of unsafe level crossings, but they were largely removed in the 1960's and '70's.
https://www.appellawyer.com/blog/sem...er-regulations |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by chawkins99
(Post 13217873)
Something we discovered very quickly after moving to the US over 20 years ago was the difference in attitude toward public safety.
I've yet to see any roof work involving scaffolding. The most I've seen was on a new build that had - I wouldn't even describe it as minimal scaffolding - a structure that allowed a plank level with the roof line but not even a guard rail for a person walking/wheeling along it. While bigger buildings may have platforms for painting or window cleaning I was surprised to see a window cleaner doing six floors of the hospital from a harness. :eek: (at least he was in the right place if he fell) |
Re: Meanwhile in Florida
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13217899)
I made a similar observation upon moving here (Canada).
I've yet to see any roof work involving scaffolding. The most I've seen was on a new build that had - I wouldn't even describe it as minimal scaffolding - a structure that allowed a plank level with the roof line but not even a guard rail for a person walking/wheeling along it. While bigger buildings may have platforms for painting or window cleaning I was surprised to see a window cleaner doing six floors of the hospital from a harness. :eek: (at least he was in the right place if he fell) |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:13 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.