Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
#106
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
So potentially a powerful quake could take down the back-up generators, it wouldn't necessarily take a tsunami to take out the plant. If they say it can withstand up to 7.5, they presumably think it couldn't take a 8.9, a tsunami has nothing to do with the effect it could have.
I read on the BBC that plant 4 was storing the rods in what they describe as being like a swimming pool. Not being able to continually pump in water has resulted in the pool drying up.
I read on the BBC that plant 4 was storing the rods in what they describe as being like a swimming pool. Not being able to continually pump in water has resulted in the pool drying up.
#107
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
I don't believe they were storing the rods but they were in the process of refueling or were preparing to refuel the reactor (reactor is like a swimming pool). When they refuel, they change the rods.
Last edited by Michael; Mar 15th 2011 at 8:59 pm.
#108
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
At the time of the earthquake, reactors 4, 5 and 6 were shut down for planned maintenance.
During this period, fuel rods are withdrawn from the reactor and stored in a pool - looking like a big swimming pool - in the upper level of the reactor building, outside the containment vessel.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12745186
#109
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
Just because plant 4 was shut down (ie not generating power) doesn't mean that the fuel wasn't still emitting radiation and generating heat. They can switch off the turbines, but you can't stop the fuel itself (as I'm sure you know). You get hit with a 9.0 earthquake, and something that is generating heat touches something else, fires will start.
I'm sorry - I know I sound like I'm a patronising f**kwad, and I'll hold my hand up to that but I don't see this as a case against nuclear power. Rather I see it as a spotlight of how bloody well engineered this thing was in the first place that it could go through this quake/tsunami and be in as (relatively) good condition as it is.
I've stated elsewhere, that for clean power there are many alternatives. But for now, waste containment notwithstanding, for pure CO2 emissions elimination, nuclear is doing its thing right now. Ironically solar power is provided by the biggest nuclear fusion reactor in our immediate vicinity but I digress .
I'll concur that misinformation = speculation but cut the Japanese some slack - they're rebuilding after major damage to their infrastructure, they can be excused a few mistakes in reporting.
I'm sorry - I know I sound like I'm a patronising f**kwad, and I'll hold my hand up to that but I don't see this as a case against nuclear power. Rather I see it as a spotlight of how bloody well engineered this thing was in the first place that it could go through this quake/tsunami and be in as (relatively) good condition as it is.
I've stated elsewhere, that for clean power there are many alternatives. But for now, waste containment notwithstanding, for pure CO2 emissions elimination, nuclear is doing its thing right now. Ironically solar power is provided by the biggest nuclear fusion reactor in our immediate vicinity but I digress .
I'll concur that misinformation = speculation but cut the Japanese some slack - they're rebuilding after major damage to their infrastructure, they can be excused a few mistakes in reporting.
Yesterday on Sean Hanity, he had guest who was a self proclaimed expert (he claimed he was an expert since he studied Chernobyl and Three Mile Island but not trained in the nuclear field or any science) from the Heartland Institute (one of the right wing groups that claim that global warming isn't real) and he claimed that there isn't any problems. I believe he also stated that Tokyo is too far to get the radiation cloud since the plant would have to have an explosion like Chernobyl to throw the cloud high enough in the air to reach Tokyo. However, last night Japanese officials put out an alert that the radiation could possibly reach Tokyo within 24 hours.
Last edited by Michael; Mar 15th 2011 at 9:25 pm.
#110
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
I agree that there is a lot of speculation but I really dislike it when a right wing self proclaimed expert comes on tv and claims that there isn't any problems with the nuclear plants in Japan.
Yesterday on Sean Hanity, he had guest who was a self proclaimed expert (he calimed he was an expert since he studied Chernobyl and Three Mile Island) from the Heartland Institute (one of the right wing groups that claim that global warming isn't real) and he claimed that there isn't any problems. I believe he also stated that Tokyo is too far to get the radiation cloud since the plant would have to have an explosion like Chernobyl to throw the cloud high enough in the air to reach Tokyo. However, last night Japanese officials put out an alert that the radiation could possibly reach Tokyo within 24 hours.
Yesterday on Sean Hanity, he had guest who was a self proclaimed expert (he calimed he was an expert since he studied Chernobyl and Three Mile Island) from the Heartland Institute (one of the right wing groups that claim that global warming isn't real) and he claimed that there isn't any problems. I believe he also stated that Tokyo is too far to get the radiation cloud since the plant would have to have an explosion like Chernobyl to throw the cloud high enough in the air to reach Tokyo. However, last night Japanese officials put out an alert that the radiation could possibly reach Tokyo within 24 hours.
Nobody on the right knows a f**king thing about science, engineering of progress thereof anyway, bunch of anti-intellectualist arsewipes to a man, they are.
#111
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
Quote from the article, full article in the link below
At the time of the earthquake, reactors 4, 5 and 6 were shut down for planned maintenance.
During this period, fuel rods are withdrawn from the reactor and stored in a pool - looking like a big swimming pool - in the upper level of the reactor building, outside the containment vessel.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12745186
At the time of the earthquake, reactors 4, 5 and 6 were shut down for planned maintenance.
During this period, fuel rods are withdrawn from the reactor and stored in a pool - looking like a big swimming pool - in the upper level of the reactor building, outside the containment vessel.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12745186
The plants also store spent fuel in drums outside the containment vessel. In France and a few other countries, the spent fuel is reprocessed. In the US those drums were supposed be stored at Yuca mountain in Utah but after the federal government spent $3 billion building the salt mine caverns, Utah now opposes the plan.
#112
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
Also I believe when they say that the nuclear plants in southern California can withstand a 7.5 earthquake, it is assumed that the epic center is at the nearest point on the closest fault. If the epic center is further away, it should be able to withstand a greater magnitude quake.
It was at 4:31 in the morning and it went on FOREVER and it WOULD NOT STOP. In actuality, it was less than a minute. I have seen a BBC video which was 1:05 long and it ended before the shaking did.
Funny thing about news photos from Northridge -- the damage was extensive, to be sure, but it was not uniform. 99% of structures were just fine. In my house, the water heater broke its water lines [I fixed that afternoon]. The weirdest thing was top of one toilet tank was thrown up and shattered the tank when it came back down. Wife picked up a toilet that afternoon and we replaced it.
We were without power for 16 hours. We recovered telephone service at 7:30 am [four hours after the quake]. We called the New Jersey relatives -- and they were telling us what it looked like on TV!
Immediately after the quake -- with all the power out, it was the most beautiful night sky one can imagine. However, every burglar and car alarm in the city had gone off. It is the weird things that are remembered.
Final note: I am impressed with how the Japanese are handling this.
#113
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
Jesus effing Christ, what a stupid cnut he is. I mean, nuclear power in of itself is OK, but I think most people would agree that there are one or two issues over in Japan right now
Nobody on the right knows a f**king thing about science, engineering of progress thereof anyway, bunch of anti-intellectualist arsewipes to a man, they are.
Nobody on the right knows a f**king thing about science, engineering of progress thereof anyway, bunch of anti-intellectualist arsewipes to a man, they are.
#114
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
I also dislike it when some tree hugger claims that no nuclear power plants should be built claiming that they are all too dangerous. But when they are asked about the health effects of fossil fuel plants, they also want to get rid of all of those. They even want to get rid of hydroelectric plants since they do damage to the environment.
#115
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
As the US is so litigious, I guess we can sue for medical costs if we get cancer from a nuclear plant oh wait they'll say it was from all the other sources.
#116
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
It takes that long to get a lawsuit through we'll have all died of the affects by then. We could always turn this into another debate on how we can all go back to the UK and get free NHS treatment though.
#118
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
France's ASN nuclear safety authority said on Tuesday the nuclear accident at Tokyo Electric Power Co's (9501.T) Fukushima Daiichi plant could now be classed as level six out of an international scale of one to seven.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...72E2M920110315
To me it seems that it is currently a Level 5 failure but probably one the way to a Level 6 failure since the definition of Level 6 is "Significant release of radioactive material likely to require implementation of planned countermeasures".
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...72E2M920110315
To me it seems that it is currently a Level 5 failure but probably one the way to a Level 6 failure since the definition of Level 6 is "Significant release of radioactive material likely to require implementation of planned countermeasures".
#119
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
The meaning of magnitude can be hard to understand. I am having memories of the 1994 Northridge temblor. It was rated 6.7 at the time and later downrated to 6.4. But the epicenter was right under the intersection of Reseda Blvd. and Saticoy in Reseda. [Northridge is a tonier address than Reseda -- Reseda gets no respect, but I digress].
It was at 4:31 in the morning and it went on FOREVER and it WOULD NOT STOP. In actuality, it was less than a minute. I have seen a BBC video which was 1:05 long and it ended before the shaking did.
Funny thing about news photos from Northridge -- the damage was extensive, to be sure, but it was not uniform. 99% of structures were just fine. In my house, the water heater broke its water lines [I fixed that afternoon]. The weirdest thing was top of one toilet tank was thrown up and shattered the tank when it came back down. Wife picked up a toilet that afternoon and we replaced it.
We were without power for 16 hours. We recovered telephone service at 7:30 am [four hours after the quake]. We called the New Jersey relatives -- and they were telling us what it looked like on TV!
Immediately after the quake -- with all the power out, it was the most beautiful night sky one can imagine. However, every burglar and car alarm in the city had gone off. It is the weird things that are remembered.
Final note: I am impressed with how the Japanese are handling this.
It was at 4:31 in the morning and it went on FOREVER and it WOULD NOT STOP. In actuality, it was less than a minute. I have seen a BBC video which was 1:05 long and it ended before the shaking did.
Funny thing about news photos from Northridge -- the damage was extensive, to be sure, but it was not uniform. 99% of structures were just fine. In my house, the water heater broke its water lines [I fixed that afternoon]. The weirdest thing was top of one toilet tank was thrown up and shattered the tank when it came back down. Wife picked up a toilet that afternoon and we replaced it.
We were without power for 16 hours. We recovered telephone service at 7:30 am [four hours after the quake]. We called the New Jersey relatives -- and they were telling us what it looked like on TV!
Immediately after the quake -- with all the power out, it was the most beautiful night sky one can imagine. However, every burglar and car alarm in the city had gone off. It is the weird things that are remembered.
Final note: I am impressed with how the Japanese are handling this.
However, San Francisco at about 60 miles away from the epic center had major damage due to homes built on landfill in the Marina district and the east bay freeway collapsed as well as a section of the bay bridge.
#120
Re: Japan 8.9 Earthquake & Tsunami
So potentially a powerful quake could take down the back-up generators, it wouldn't necessarily take a tsunami to take out the plant. If they say it can withstand up to 7.5, they presumably think it couldn't take a 8.9, a tsunami has nothing to do with the effect it could have.
I read on the BBC that plant 4 was storing the rods in what they describe as being like a swimming pool. Not being able to continually pump in water has resulted in the pool drying up.
I read on the BBC that plant 4 was storing the rods in what they describe as being like a swimming pool. Not being able to continually pump in water has resulted in the pool drying up.
The spent fuel pool is normally cooled, it especially needs it when shut down for refueling, the spent rods that have just come from the reactor are still temperature hot.
We design to limit weakness not strength, it is at least capable of withstanding the stated earthquake, probably more but how much more is not known.