![]() |
Re: 2020 Election
Any chance of that happening for the next two debates? |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12916370)
There's no way you'll get either campaign to agree to that.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Everything that Trump touches turns to shit and this debate was no exception. 128 interruptions by Trump and 25 times when Wallace has to implore him as to the debate rules. Honestly, with that kind of behaviour the debate would have been a shit show regardless of Trump’s opponent.
i can’t see any point of future debates involving Trump. Regardless of any attempt to rein him in he will behave just the same. It’s all he knows how to do. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by spouse of scouse
(Post 12916373)
What reason/s would they have for saying no? Genuinely interested. I can see Trump hating the idea because it destroys his entire MO, but Biden?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12916375)
It would mean he couldn't call out Trumps lies as he tells them, and any level of misinformation is dangerous right now.
|
Re: 2020 Election
I watched the whole thing, against my better judgment (and while cooking dinner). Then I made a point of flipping between CNN and Fox News for the 'analysis'. CNN accurately called it a 'shit show', while Fox said Trump clearly won, was 'strong', said what needed to be said, etc etc. Fox also said Telemundo/Univision (the main Spanish Language channel in the US) had Trump winning by a large margin; don't know if that's true or not.
Cutting the mic of the 'non-speaker' might just be a rule change worth asking for. |
Re: 2020 Election
It took 90 minutes for the US to become the laughing stock of the world, thanks to 2 old goons. Well done America!!!
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12916359)
That's not what I said. I said I don't care about the shirts they wear. Nice try putting words in my mouth though.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12916397)
Then I presume, that you dont appreciate the changed semiotics, and the repercussion, of that image between yesterday at this time, and today.
se·mi·ot·ics noun
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12916398)
Unknown word alert!
se·mi·ot·ics noun
I thought it was just a spelling mistake. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Nutek
(Post 12916402)
Thanks. :)
I thought it was just a spelling mistake. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12916397)
Then I presume, that you dont appreciate the changed semiotics, and the repercussion, of that image between yesterday at this time, and today.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
(Post 12916309)
Yeah but how many Americans would agree to being paid 3500 a month minimum wage like people in Geneva will soon get
Geneva is to raise its minimum wage to almost £3,500 a month, reported to be the highest in the world https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ty-switzerland Plus the Swiss make better chocolate bars. So the article says 4,086 Swiss francs per month guaranteed minimum, that at current exchange rate comes to 5,904 CAD$. I can assure we will never see that level of min wage in Canada either, look at how much the conservatives fought when some provinces raised it to $14 or $15 per hour proclaiming it would ruin the economy and companies can't afford to pay employees $15/hr. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12916426)
So the article says 4,086 Swiss francs per month guaranteed minimum, that at current exchange rate comes to 5,904 CAD$.
I can assure we will never see that level of min wage in Canada either, look at how much the conservatives fought when some provinces raised it to $14 or $15 per hour proclaiming it would ruin the economy and companies can't afford to pay employees $15/hr. ​​​​​​Th e irony is that this would create far more income for the state through taxation. The downside of enforced minimum wage is everything becomes more expensive. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12916407)
Anyone who thought that Trump wasn't all in for the far far right yesterday, but thinks he is today, hasn't been paying attention. I don't tend to dwell on minutia.
I think the difference is the direct shout-out from POTUS. That adds a whole new level, I don't that's minutia at all. The PBs are pretty damn happy about it. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:28 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.