|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by sid nv
(Post 12845175)
I don't know the facts, but can you please at least sort your fonts out.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12844996)
How does Harris not have legislative experience? She's a Senator. Sure only 3 years, but how long was Obama in the Senate before he won the Presidency?
The progressives have no where to go, so I think Biden will choose someone to get himself the swing vote such as Klobuchar. Obama I think the 'exception that proves the rule'. Whether one supported his policies or not, with his limited prior experience he was able after taking office of a country in a financial mess to hold things together. Gambling on inexperience won't work out all the time. While some of the same weaknesses could be applied to Sanders, he is driven by a vision of transforming the country, to me Biden is like Romney, tinker here, tinker there, without control of the Senate I can't see a Biden presidency achieving ,much. Sanders would have offered America a sincere and real choice,The pundits, media and the DNC I believe underestimated his potential to win. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by morpeth
(Post 12845202)
3 years in the Senate, no foreign policy experience, no executive experience as a governor or mayor or in private or military sector, let alone lack of economic expertise to be elected to assist and even replace a visibly ageing lifetime politician - no I can't imagine how Kamala would be considered qualified.
The progressives have no where to go, so I think Biden will choose someone to get himself the swing vote such as Klobuchar. Obama I think the 'exception that proves the rule'. Whether one supported his policies or not, with his limited prior experience he was able after taking office of a country in a financial mess to hold things together. Gambling on inexperience won't work out all the time. While some of the same weaknesses could be applied to Sanders, he is driven by a vision of transforming the country, to me Biden is like Romney, tinker here, tinker there, without control of the Senate I can't see a Biden presidency achieving ,much. Sanders would have offered America a sincere and real choice,The pundits, media and the DNC I believe underestimated his potential to win. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by sid nv
(Post 12845175)
I don't know the facts, but can you please at least sort your fonts out.
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12845181)
Boiler's too gleeful about posting this story to have time to worry about niceties like fonts.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12845143)
He used to know what LMGTFY was but that was before the caught the dementia. :(
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12845181)
Boiler's too gleeful about posting this story to have time to worry about niceties like fonts.
|
Re: 2020 Election
But I thought all women were liars? It was decided in 2016 that women don't matter and rape is a-okay as long as the man denies it.
https://www.businessinsider.com/wome...t-list-2017-12 "Every woman lied when they came forward to hurt my campaign," the Republican nominee said during a 2016 rally. "Total fabrication. The events never happened. Never. All of these liars will be sued after the election is over." LOOK IT'S THE BATTLE OF THE RAPISTS!!! HE WHO RAPED THE FEWEST WOMEN WINS!!!!!!!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald...ct_allegations |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12845431)
But I thought all women were liars? It was decided in 2016 that women don't matter and rape is a-okay as long as the man denies it.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Cape Blue
(Post 12845440)
I thought we had to "believe women"?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Cape Blue
(Post 12845278)
Whatever you do don't engage with the substance of the post, just focus on the fonts, you'll be safe that way.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12845421)
Yeah, remember all the Trump rape accusations that he used extra large font to bellow about? Because he's fair and balanced?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by vespucci
(Post 12845206)
Indeed. And they were concerned that time was running out to stop him, so though Biden was thought to be finished, when African-Americans voted for him in South Carolina, they saw this as the tool they needed, and that's why we have Biden.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by morpeth
(Post 12845202)
Obama I think the 'exception that proves the rule'. Whether one supported his policies or not, with his limited prior experience he was able after taking office of a country in a financial mess to hold things together. Gambling on inexperience won't work out all the time..
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12845580)
'They' - DNC? So the DNC caused Biden to win, not the primary voters who voted overwhelmingly for him? How can you spin this into a conspiracy by the DNC against Sanders or for Biden, when the voters clearly voted?
This was at a point when there were many other candidates in the race. I don't see how you can spin that other than it was an overwhelming victory for Biden. |
Re: 2020 Election
Just seems odd with a clean slate that Biden would or will be the one. Why do the Dems want to go there?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:02 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.