![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12071635)
Any criticism of him is met with you (1) bringing up a false equivalent about Clinton or (2) you drag in pro-Trump tropes from the twittersphere.
Did you even see post #10465? It was made an hour before your (predictable) pro-Trump response. If he's not your guy then stop defending him in the exact way that all of his surrogates do. Otherwise, you need to own it. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12071536)
Okay, got it. Canada is single-handedly propping up the entire United States economy and therefore have an interest in the election. Do you or your Canadian brethren have any thoughts or opinions on the actual election itself?
I'm not going to keep doing this because you're obviously trolling this thread for your own purposes. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12071775)
Well, it was dug out of the private collection / vault of the TV production company, was it not? Wasn't in the public domain as it was never broadcast. It was found when the production company itself began digging, inspired by other revelations?
On the plus side 2020 is going to be hilarious. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 12071849)
His behavior in general is well documented. It wouldn't have taken much digging for just one of those 16 candidates to find something. If not this clip then something else. Really pathetic by the GOP to let themselves get into this position.
On the plus side 2020 is going to be hilarious. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 12071851)
If the Republican primary had not been a huge collection of idiots and wannabes someone might have dug into it. They all kept thinking he was going to fade away and failed to take him seriously.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 12071849)
His behavior in general is well documented. It wouldn't have taken much digging for just one of those 16 candidates to find something. If not this clip then something else. Really pathetic by the GOP to let themselves get into this position.
On the plus side 2020 is going to be hilarious. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 12071694)
Good lord...now come the conversations he has had over the years on Howard Sterns show....barf worthy. Including his telling Stern it was ok to call his daughter "a piece of ass".
Donald Trump's decades-long history of misogynistic comments and crude sex talk - CNNPolitics.com I have heard guys talking like that at work, or at a bar. And some expressing outrage probably have at times made some similar comments. But the Howard Stern interview is beyond belief. I have never met any man in my life anywhere who would be comfortable with someone using the phrase " piece of ass" to describe his daughter. I would walk out or punch the guy in the face if anyone said such a thing about my daughter. And I would never have someone like Donald Trump around my wife or daughter. It makes me really wonder how he was brought up, and how he brought up his children. And look at the age he made such comments, not in his teens or twenties but as a grown man with a wife and children. I am astonished that Trump and Clinton are the choices, I wonder what type of candidates we get in the future. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by morpeth
(Post 12072115)
I am astonished that Trump and Clinton are the choices, I wonder what type of candidates we get in the future.
Kim? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12072116)
:eek:
Kim? |
Re: 2016 Election
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by morpeth
(Post 12072115)
I have heard guys talking like that at work, or at a bar. And some expressing outrage probably have at times made some similar comments. But the Howard Stern interview is beyond belief. I have never met any man in my life anywhere who would be comfortable with someone using the phrase " piece of ass" to describe his daughter. I would walk out or punch the guy in the face if anyone said such a thing about my daughter. And I would never have someone like Donald Trump around my wife or daughter. It makes me really wonder how he was brought up, and how he brought up his children.
And look at the age he made such comments, not in his teens or twenties but as a grown man with a wife and children. I am astonished that Trump and Clinton are the choices, I wonder what type of candidates we get in the future. And Bill's not running for President. So until someone plays me a tape of Hillary saying she'd like to grab a guy's c**k, this is a false equivalency. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12072116)
:eek:
Kim? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Nutmegger
(Post 12071776)
Giuliani announced he was dumping her mother at a press conference--that's how Donna Hanover found out he had been playing around with the gold digger Judith. No love lost between him and his kids. Rudi is another lovely role model.
I've often felt like the whole Trump obsession with saving the coal industry (which we know he won't) to be overrepresented in this election. He brings it up when nobody is asking. So, no, they're not just "old New York buddies". Giuliani is playing Trump like a fiddle. Giuliani is not as addle brained as he appears but Trump is even more stupid than I originally thought. Incidentally, Giuliani represented Purdue Pharma, the company that was brought up on federal charges for misleading the medical community and general public about the addictive nature of OxyContin. They settled for around 650 million and triggered the current heroin epidemic. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12072310)
Before this election, I met a man whose daughter worked for Rudy Giuliani's law firm. I mentioned something about her living in NY and he informed me that Giuliani had law firms in New York and Houston. It occurred to me today to look into it a little more and as it turns out, his law firm offers legal and lobbying services to the oil and gas industry as well as the coal industry. They also represent big pharma. He left the firm earlier this year under "friendly" circumstances.
I've often felt like the whole Trump obsession with saving the coal industry (which we know he won't) to be overrepresented in this election. He brings it up when nobody is asking. So, no, they're not just "old New York buddies". Giuliani is playing Trump like a fiddle. Giuliani is not as addle brained as he appears but Trump is even more stupid than I originally thought. Incidentally, Giuliani represented Purdue Pharma, the company that was brought up on federal charges for misleading the medical community and general public about the addictive nature of OxyContin. They settled for around 650 million and triggered the current heroin epidemic. http://http://nypost.com/2007/04/02/...p-killer-firm/ |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Nutmegger
(Post 12072322)
Judi thinks she's a medical expert --he was caught paying her big bucks as a consultant. This is what she actually did
http://http://nypost.com/2007/04/02/...p-killer-firm/ “A dead dog doesn’t bleed,†Hirsch said in a 1988 issue of Time magazine. “You need to have real blood-flow conditions, or you get a false sense of security.†Good God. :blink: |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:47 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.