2016 Election
#8191
Re: 2016 Election
Meh, national popular vote is great for the media to keep saying "it's neck and neck" but otherwise pointless. How it translates into electoral college votes on a state by state basis is much more important and according to Nate's numbers much more telling.
Much like Obama v Romney which was "a tight race" wasn't really in the end.
Much like Obama v Romney which was "a tight race" wasn't really in the end.
#8192
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: 2016 Election
The reality is that there aren't that many Sanders supporters. He lost the primary in a popular vote landslide, and as usual, not many Democrats were so fired up that they bothered to vote in the primary in the first place. For every Bernie Bro who is having a meltdown, there will be a woman or minority voter who is fearful enough of Trump to vote against him.
#8193
Return of bouncing girl!
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: The Fourth Reich
Posts: 4,931
Re: 2016 Election
In a given election year, about 10% of Democrats will cross party lines, for whatever reason.
The reality is that there aren't that many Sanders supporters. He lost the primary in a popular vote landslide, and as usual, not many Democrats were so fired up that they bothered to vote in the primary in the first place. For every Bernie Bro who is having a meltdown, there will be a woman or minority voter who is fearful enough of Trump to vote against him.
The reality is that there aren't that many Sanders supporters. He lost the primary in a popular vote landslide, and as usual, not many Democrats were so fired up that they bothered to vote in the primary in the first place. For every Bernie Bro who is having a meltdown, there will be a woman or minority voter who is fearful enough of Trump to vote against him.
#8194
Re: 2016 Election
....
But Libertarians don't win that high of a percentage of a vote, either. Johnson was their candidate in 2012, and received 1% of the vote. While it's possible that Trump will bolster the percentage of defectors for this election, I wouldn't count on it.
... .
But Libertarians don't win that high of a percentage of a vote, either. Johnson was their candidate in 2012, and received 1% of the vote. While it's possible that Trump will bolster the percentage of defectors for this election, I wouldn't count on it.
... .
#8195
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: 2016 Election
We should also remember that there are voters who simply don't care very much either way. They don't love or hate either candidate or have the feelings of polarization that are felt by the diehards. Unfortunately, Trump is seen as being the stronger candidate for the economy (yes, these people are uninformed) and that's often what drives elections, but Trump has the unique feature of being more frightening and personally irritating than most.
Understand that Nate Silver is just setting odds, as would a bookmaker. The number from him that counts is that he has Clinton with an 80% chance of winning the election (although I suspect that figure will decline somewhat as November approaches.)
#8196
Re: 2016 Election
It's early days. My guess is that Johnson won't get anything close to 7%. As the election approaches, the either-or nature of the election will crystallize positions for many of those alleged third-party supporters and the undecideds.
We should also remember that there are voters who simply don't care very much either way. They don't love or hate either candidate or have the feelings of polarization that are felt by the diehards. Unfortunately, Trump is seen as being the stronger candidate for the economy (yes, these people are uninformed) and that's often what drives elections, but Trump has the unique feature of being more frightening and personally irritating than most.
Understand that Nate Silver is just setting odds, as would a bookmaker. The number from him that counts is that he has Clinton with an 80% chance of winning the election (although I suspect that figure will decline somewhat as November approaches.)
We should also remember that there are voters who simply don't care very much either way. They don't love or hate either candidate or have the feelings of polarization that are felt by the diehards. Unfortunately, Trump is seen as being the stronger candidate for the economy (yes, these people are uninformed) and that's often what drives elections, but Trump has the unique feature of being more frightening and personally irritating than most.
Understand that Nate Silver is just setting odds, as would a bookmaker. The number from him that counts is that he has Clinton with an 80% chance of winning the election (although I suspect that figure will decline somewhat as November approaches.)
Nothing would make me happier than to see Trump lose decisively. And now there's the added bonus that maybe - just maybe - it will silence the likes of 'The Mad Pooper', because nothing else seems like it will have that effect.
#8197
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: 2016 Election
Well I hope you are right, because all the swing states I looked at show Johnson+Trump getting more than Clinton, so if Johnson supporters switch to Trump, there could be trouble.
Nothing would make me happier than to see Trump lose decisively. And now there's the added bonus that maybe - just maybe - it will silence the likes of 'The Mad Pooper', because nothing else seems like it will have that effect.
Nothing would make me happier than to see Trump lose decisively. And now there's the added bonus that maybe - just maybe - it will silence the likes of 'The Mad Pooper', because nothing else seems like it will have that effect.
I wouldn't expect Johnson to get the 7%, but it may be a signal that there is an element of GOP discontent that is so meaningful that it will lead to a voter boycott that is just large enough to matter. That won't translate into Johnson getting 7% of the vote, but it may mean that 1-2% of it goes to Johnson while Trump is denied some large element of whatever's left of it by whatever means.
The GOP notables who are either claiming that they will not vote for Trump or else are lending support to someone else are probably not going to move that many voters, but it may move a meaningful fraction of them. The rebellion is clearly underway.
#8198
Re: 2016 Election
My guess is that the GOP will take some hits due to lower turnout. The GOP usually benefits from low turnout because that equates to Democrats staying home, but this time may be different.
I wouldn't expect Johnson to get the 7%, but it may be a signal that there is an element of GOP discontent that is so meaningful that it will lead to a voter boycott that is just large enough to matter. That won't translate into Johnson getting 7% of the vote, but it may mean that 1-2% of it goes to Johnson while Trump is denied some large element of whatever's left of it by whatever means.
The GOP notables who are either claiming that they will not vote for Trump or else are lending support to someone else are probably not going to move that many voters, but it may move a meaningful fraction of them. The rebellion is clearly underway.
I wouldn't expect Johnson to get the 7%, but it may be a signal that there is an element of GOP discontent that is so meaningful that it will lead to a voter boycott that is just large enough to matter. That won't translate into Johnson getting 7% of the vote, but it may mean that 1-2% of it goes to Johnson while Trump is denied some large element of whatever's left of it by whatever means.
The GOP notables who are either claiming that they will not vote for Trump or else are lending support to someone else are probably not going to move that many voters, but it may move a meaningful fraction of them. The rebellion is clearly underway.
#8200
Return of bouncing girl!
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: The Fourth Reich
Posts: 4,931
Re: 2016 Election
Personally, I think those rules are ridiculous. Libertarians and Greens should be allowed to have a presence at the debates. I understand that the debates can't become a free for all, but those are 2 fairly major, well established parties which should be given a chance to present their policies to the nation.
#8201
Re: 2016 Election
Hey, who moved us to TIO. The quality of argument is going to go right down now!
(Insert Monty Python sketch).
(Insert Monty Python sketch).
#8202
Return of bouncing girl!
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: The Fourth Reich
Posts: 4,931
Re: 2016 Election
Not sure why the US residents can't have their own thread about the US election
#8203
Return of bouncing girl!
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: The Fourth Reich
Posts: 4,931
Re: 2016 Election
Looks as though the Clinton campaign isn't the only one plagued by rape allegations... Why The New Child Rape Case Filed Against Donald Trump Should Not Be Ignored
#8204
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
Re: 2016 Election
But what do I know?