![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11892757)
Can you tell us what percentage of the 11+ million illegals work in agriculture, what percentage work in jobs that Americans will do, such as construction, warehousing, food processing plants, trucking, clothing manufacturing, illegal drug trafficking, and what percentage are receiving government benefits intended for USCs?
As for benefits...I think you will find that without proof ef legal status they are nye impossible to come by. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11892753)
In the video, he claims "Some people academically believe socialism, communism, Marxism are the same thing."
It's not surprising that the Fox audience is less informed than those who don't watch the news at all. That sort of misstatement is the norm for right-wing media outlets, which are pathologically unable to separate facts from opinion. (And I am neither a communist nor a socialist, so it's not as if I'm defending either of those positions.) |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 11892840)
An estimated 3 million work in agriculture. As for the rest of your post...yes...there are a number of jobs you mentioned that could be filled by Americans but put the blame where it belongs...on the businesses that employ them and encourage the situation. I am not about to dump on desperate people who have often been lured to the country by agents of companies who want such workers. Until the government gets serious about clamping down on those companies with stiff fines and jail time for multiple offenses..the problem will remain.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by username.exe
(Post 11892844)
When she says: 'But let's not get bogged down by the facts...' :lol:.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 11892846)
That is the irony... we have Republican candidates wanting to deport 11 million people, but there is nary a mention of taking action against employers whose hiring of undocumented workers feeds the issue. If they pushed for severe (criminal) penalties against such employers, I would take their position more seriously.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11892753)
In the video, he claims "Some people academically believe socialism, communism, Marxism are the same thing."
It's not surprising that the Fox audience is less informed than those who don't watch the news at all. That sort of misstatement is the norm for right-wing media outlets, which are pathologically unable to separate facts from opinion. (And I am neither a communist nor a socialist, so it's not as if I'm defending either of those positions.) |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by themadpooper
(Post 11892853)
As someone who regularly watches Fox, I find this stereotype about it really quite tiresome and terribly smug. I also watch CNN and their bias for the other side is just as bad, every night Rachel Maddow conducts a party political broadcast on behalf of the Dems but no one makes disparaging comments about the intelligence of their viewership
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by themadpooper
(Post 11892853)
As someone who regularly watches Fox, I find this stereotype about it really quite tiresome and terribly smug. I also watch CNN and their bias for the other side is just as bad, every night Rachel Maddow conducts a party political broadcast on behalf of the Dems but no one makes disparaging comments about the intelligence of their viewership
|
Re: 2016 Election
[QUOTE=Jsmth321;11892837]We have higher wages in Canada and yes we do pay more for some things but nothing what you describe.
Last hotel I was at paid 13/14 per hour to start and our average rate was only 80 to 100 per night. Fast food pays anywhere from 11 to 13 to start and prices are not much higher then in WA state. Min wage in BC is 10.40hr but many places have to pay more due to market demands. We manage not to have to rely on cheap cheap illegal labor and still function. Sorry but Canada is a monumental rip off compared to America; the cost of stuff is astronomical Gas, beer, food in general, the average mortgage. It's not even close |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11892856)
That's impressive that you see Rachel Maddow on CNN, considering she's has a show on MSNBC.
|
Re: 2016 Election
One channel has "news" in the name, MSNBC doesn't. I see MSNBC as more of a magazine channel - it contains some news but it isn't really a news channel. Fox News pretends to be a news channel, but it is mostly opinion, particularly at peak viewing time. I'm told that it is relatively sane around lunch time.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Anian
(Post 11892867)
One channel has "news" in the name, MSNBC doesn't. I see MSNBC as more of a magazine channel - it contains some news but it isn't really a news channel. Fox News pretends to be a news channel, but it is mostly opinion, particularly at peak viewing time. I'm told that it is relatively sane around lunch time.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by themadpooper
(Post 11892863)
Sorry but Canada is a monumental rip off compared to America; the cost of stuff is astronomical
Gas, beer, food in general, the average mortgage. It's not even close |
Re: 2016 Election
The quotes people!
Please check your posts after posting. If the post you have quoted appears to be cocked up...please amend or delete it. Cocked up quotes spoil the thread making it hard to read the posts. Thank you. http://britishexpats.com/forum/take-...rectly-873146/ |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by themadpooper
(Post 11892853)
As someone who regularly watches Fox, I find this stereotype about it really quite tiresome and terribly smug.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:03 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.