British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Trailer Park (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/)
-   -   2016 Election (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/2016-election-855107/)

amideislas Mar 9th 2016 4:45 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP (Post 11890777)
That isn't how it works. The Republicans loathe her because (a) she is Hillary Clinton and (b) a member of the opposing party. Her policies are irrelevant; she is not being judged by the right based upon her positions or track record, but based upon the fact that she is The Other and therefore must be destroyed.

That being said, they would much prefer to have Bernie Sanders as an opponent because he can be torn to shreds as a pinko commie socialist. They haven't bothered to attack him because it is presumed that he will not be the nominee and because they are hoping against hope that he might be the nominee. Their efforts to attack Clinton has gone as far as they can go and they really won't be able to do much to her that they haven't done already, whereas Sanders represents fresh meat.

Aside from the loathing part (which is true) that's pretty much what I said.

If sanders is your man, vote for him. But I believe that's likely to hand the election to Trump.

Giantaxe Mar 9th 2016 4:47 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11890788)

She's proposing that Medicare be allowed to negotiate prescription drug prices (in the same manner that the VA can) and the ability to import drugs under certain circumstances. Is that an expansion of the ACA? Not really, unless you believe that any legislation on healthcare moving forward is an "expansion of the ACA".

zargof Mar 9th 2016 4:51 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by amideislas (Post 11890789)
I also gave you a reasonable answer to that. Again, I am not a prophet.

Frankly, I don't really like Clinton at all. I like Bernie, but only because he's kind of a cute old guy with an honest passion.

But in politics of the two, her chances are far better.

I am a right-leaning centrist by nature, but there is not one republican candidate that I find remotely sensible. The entire party is living in an alternate reality.

The idea that just because Clinton's policies are more moderate some how makes them more realistic shows you haven't been paying attention over the last few years. Compromise is a dirty word to Republicans in Congress. Anything that is proposed by a Democrat will be shot down. Why does anyone think that is going to change?

Case in point: after Sandy Hook, Obama tried to expand background checks, something that was supported by 90% of the population. Couldn't get it done. Why? Because the NRA and their pet Congressmen stopped it.

Everything that Obama has proposed has been shot down, and I don't see how that will change if Clinton is President.

amideislas Mar 9th 2016 4:53 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11890799)
The idea that just because Clinton's policies are more moderate some how makes them more realistic shows you haven't been paying attention over the last few years. Compromise is a dirty word to Republicans in Congress. Anything that is proposed by a Democrat will be shot down. Why does anyone think that is going to change?

Case in point: after Sandy Hook, Obama tried to expand background checks, something that was supported by 90% of the population. Couldn't get it done. Why? Because the NRA and their pet Congressmen stopped it.

Everything that Obama has proposed has been shot down, and I don't see how that will change if Clinton is President.


Well then, don't vote. That'll show 'em.

zargof Mar 9th 2016 4:56 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Giantaxe (Post 11890794)
She's proposing that Medicare be allowed to negotiate prescription drug prices (in the same manner that the VA can) and the ability to import drugs under certain circumstances. Is that an expansion of the ACA? Not really, unless you believe that any legislation on healthcare moving forward is an "expansion of the ACA".

It's way more than that. And again how is it going to get through Congress?

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/health-care/

zargof Mar 9th 2016 4:56 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by amideislas (Post 11890802)
Well then, don't vote. That'll show 'em.

I can't vote.

dakota44 Mar 9th 2016 4:58 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11890806)
It's way more than that. And again how is it going to get through Congress?

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/health-care/

One would hope that if Trump is the nominee the Republican down ticket will take a hit and the Dems will take control of at least the Senate and possibly the House.

Giantaxe Mar 9th 2016 4:59 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11890799)
Case in point: after Sandy Hook, Obama tried to expand background checks, something that was supported by 90% of the population. Couldn't get it done. Why? Because the NRA and their pet Congressmen stopped it.

...including many Democrats.

RoadWarriorFromLP Mar 9th 2016 5:00 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by amideislas (Post 11890792)
Aside from the loathing part (which is true) that's pretty much what I said.

That isn't what you said. At all.

Contrary to your assertions, Clinton's centrism makes no difference in how diehard Republicans perceive her. She could shift left or right, and it would make no difference at all.

zargof Mar 9th 2016 5:03 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by dakota44 (Post 11890811)
One would hope that if Trump is the nominee the Republican down ticket will take a hit and the Dems will take control of at least the Senate and possibly the House.

Agreed, but there's way to much gerrymandering to make that the House flipping likely.

sir_eccles Mar 9th 2016 5:05 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by dakota44 (Post 11890811)
One would hope that if Trump is the nominee the Republican down ticket will take a hit and the Dems will take control of at least the Senate and possibly the House.

There is some data from the Michigan primary that makes me hopeful on that front. Basically Michigan is an open primary so you can choose to vote in any one of the races. There is a suggestion that many Ds switched to the R ballot to vote Trump. This is presumably to troll the GOP into getting in the voters' opinions a worst candidate. It would also explain a bit of the missed polling for Hillary letting Bernie in through the back door.

So, perhaps the D voters are more motivated and the Rs are more spread across too many candidates or disaffected.

sir_eccles Mar 9th 2016 5:06 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11890816)
Agreed, but there's way to much gerrymandering to make that the House flipping likely.

Something something GOP chickens something home to roost.

amideislas Mar 9th 2016 5:06 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP (Post 11890815)
That isn't what you said. At all.

Contrary to your assertions, Clinton's centrism makes no difference in how diehard Republicans perceive her. She could shift left or right, and it would make no difference at all.

Then vote for Bernie.

RoadWarriorFromLP Mar 9th 2016 5:10 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by amideislas (Post 11890823)
Then vote for Bernie.

Thanks for missing the point.

I realize that you are highly opinionated, but your level of knowledge that does not match your convictions.

Giantaxe Mar 9th 2016 5:37 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 11890806)
It's way more than that. And again how is it going to get through Congress?

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/health-care/

It may or it may not. Or part or parts of it may etc. But surely it is preferable to have a candidate who at least garners support of their own party?


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:20 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.