Wikiposts

2016 Election

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 5:53 am
  #5131  
Steerpike's Avatar
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14,683
From: Bay Area, CA
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by username.exe
If I'm not mistaken, pre-ACA your insurer could have decided that you were just too expensive to insure with your conditions and treatments and kicked you to the curb. Many had problems getting insurance and treatment in the first place due to 'pre-existing conditions'.
No, because he is on a 'group plan' provided by his employer. Such plans benefit from a requirement not to exclude anyone (for usage, for pre-existing conditions, etc). This benefit has been there for a long time, and the ACA, in part, tried to extend the basic 'strengths' of group plans to individual plans.
If he had been privately insured, then YES, he could be summarily dropped if he exceeded some (unstated, arbitrary) limit.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 5:54 am
  #5132  
Steerpike's Avatar
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14,683
From: Bay Area, CA
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by dakota44
If by some idiotic fluke...Trump won the general....we might see the electoral college play the roll that was intended for it.
Can you elaborate?
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 6:02 am
  #5133  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 302
tuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Steerpike
Well wasn't it the 'big spending' of Bush that spawned the Tea Party? They didn't like the fact that he actually did something helpful to people.
It wasn't Medicare spending but bailout spending that got them riled up. Medicare is something they earned in their minds. It was help for mortgage payers from Obama when it officially started.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 6:03 am
  #5134  
Steerpike's Avatar
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14,683
From: Bay Area, CA
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by themadpooper
...

Car insurance is a good example of what I mean, should mine and your premiums go up because of reckless drivers?
I would say that your car insurance premiums DO go up because of reckless drivers; the insurance companies spread the risk across their customer base.

Car insurance is required for everyone (read, 'individual mandate') and there are minimal coverages mandated. Insurance companies have to cover you. The biggest variable in car insurance is when you want higher coverages; similar to the gold/silver/bronze. It would be fantastic if the insurance companies could find an equivalent to the concept of 'higher rates for risky cars'. That is - if you smoke, your rates go up, or if you guzzle 50 sodas a day your rates go up, but - that's another challenge for another day.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 6:09 am
  #5135  
Anian's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,433
From: WA state
Anian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond reputeAnian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

My insurance company has a different rate for smokers than it does for non-smokers. You just have to sign a bit of paper that says you are a non-smoker. Not quite at the stage where they weigh you to determine your rate yet though!
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 6:10 am
  #5136  
zargof's Avatar
I love my brick!
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 9,304
From: Peachy
zargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Steerpike
Can you elaborate?
The members of the electoral college aren't bound to go with the popular vote. So they could in theory give a state's electoral college members to Clinton even if Trump got more votes in a state.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 6:11 am
  #5137  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 302
tuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Go stand in the peroxide/rubbing alcohol/band-aid section at Walmart and I guarantee you will find a suffering adult trying to find a DIY cure for a dental abscess.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 6:21 am
  #5138  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 348
From: Chicago, IL
themadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond reputethemadpooper has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by tuxedocat
Go stand in the peroxide/rubbing alcohol/band-aid section at Walmart and I guarantee you will find a suffering adult trying to find a DIY cure for a dental abscess.
Never seen that there myself but will make a note to look next time I'm in there

Dental insurance is separate from general health insurance. Even in the UK, where there's universal healthcare, finding good dental cover is hit and miss and most Brits don't have a regular dentist

Last edited by themadpooper; Mar 3rd 2016 at 6:37 am.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 6:30 am
  #5139  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 302
tuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond reputetuxedocat has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by themadpooper
Never seen that there myself but will make a note to look next time I'm in there

Dental insurance is separate from general health insurance. Even in the UK, where there's universal healthcare, finding good dental cover is hit and miss and most Brits don't have a regularly dentist
If they have access to a medical dr though they could get penicillin instead of going to the store with a throbbing head hoping rubbing peroxide on things will give them relief.

You are right indigent dental care is another issue, I guess that was a bad example. I was just trying to show a lot of people suffer here for the lack of basic treatment.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 6:33 am
  #5140  
dakota44's Avatar
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 27,078
From: Nova Scotia Canada
dakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond reputedakota44 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by zargof
The members of the electoral college aren't bound to go with the popular vote. So they could in theory give a state's electoral college members to Clinton even if Trump got more votes in a state.
Actually some states have laws requiring they go with the vote, though not sure that would prevent some defections. Other States have rule encouraging loyalty to the popular vote...but no enforcement. And then there are those with ni requirement. The electoral college was established due to a lack of total trust in the voting class to not elect someone with perhaps dictatorial ideas or contrary to the protections of the Constitution. In such a case the popular vote could be overruled. You know...someone like Trump. I do not think it will become an issue though. Wish it would.

Last edited by dakota44; Mar 3rd 2016 at 6:38 am.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 6:35 am
  #5141  
Steerpike's Avatar
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14,683
From: Bay Area, CA
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Anian
My insurance company has a different rate for smokers than it does for non-smokers. You just have to sign a bit of paper that says you are a non-smoker. Not quite at the stage where they weigh you to determine your rate yet though!
Is this through your employer? I believe Group Plans can do that. I don't believe ACA individual plans can. Group Plans (employer plans) can offer a variety of incentives for taking better care of yourself. I THINK the mechanism is that your employer is offering a subsidy on your premium based on your 'behavior'. In other words, the premiums the company pays the insurance company are blended across the employee base, but the amount you the employee have to contribute towards that premium is being discounted based on your participation in various initiatives. Just my understanding.

Last edited by Steerpike; Mar 3rd 2016 at 6:39 am.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 7:06 am
  #5142  
sir_eccles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,106
From: Phoenix, AZ
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Anian
My insurance company has a different rate for smokers than it does for non-smokers. You just have to sign a bit of paper that says you are a non-smoker. Not quite at the stage where they weigh you to determine your rate yet though!
Originally Posted by Steerpike
Is this through your employer? I believe Group Plans can do that. I don't believe ACA individual plans can.
Yes, under the ACA the only things that can affect your premium are age and smoking.

https://www.healthcare.gov/how-plans-set-your-premiums/
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 7:10 am
  #5143  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Does the federal government even do referendums?

I see Obamacare as an improvement but under the old system I was not insurable unless a group employer plan which only occured about 50% of the time, so the new way is certainly an improvement.

Originally Posted by themadpooper
Yeah, maxed out the deductible but $200 is nothing. Premiums aren't too bad, work covers most of it. The mrs and I are registered at one of the big hospitals in Chicago so that comes with a premium but there's no waiting around for blood tests, scans etc., which are done on the spot

My point is, Obamacare had made health insurance vastly more expensive for those of us who already had it, that's undeniable. The argument that it's justified so the less well off can get on the insurance ladder is fine, and as someone who grew on a council estate myself, I know all about being poor but Obamacare went about it the wrong way

You don't ram something as controversial as that down people's throats and then arrogantly laugh off criticism of it as self serving Republicans playing politics. Had Obamacare been subjected to a referendum, there is not a hope in hell it would've gotten voted for. I don't know anyone who likes it and I have a vast bunch of in laws who live all over America and mates from many walks of life
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 8:07 am
  #5144  
username.exe's Avatar
BE Practitioner (Level 2)
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,403
From: San Diego, CA
username.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond reputeusername.exe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Steerpike
No, because he is on a 'group plan' provided by his employer. Such plans benefit from a requirement not to exclude anyone (for usage, for pre-existing conditions, etc). This benefit has been there for a long time, and the ACA, in part, tried to extend the basic 'strengths' of group plans to individual plans.
If he had been privately insured, then YES, he could be summarily dropped if he exceeded some (unstated, arbitrary) limit.
Thank you Steerpike, I stand corrected.
 
Old Mar 3rd 2016 | 8:25 am
  #5145  
Steerpike's Avatar
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 14,683
From: Bay Area, CA
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by sir_eccles
Yes, under the ACA the only things that can affect your premium are age and smoking.

https://www.healthcare.gov/how-plans-set-your-premiums/
You are missing 'location', which can be a biggie.

According to that site:

  • Age: Premiums can be up to 3 times higher for older people than for younger ones.
  • Location: Where you live has a big effect on your premiums. Differences in competition, state and local rules, and cost of living account for this.
  • Tobacco use: Insurers can charge tobacco users up to 50% more than those who don’t use tobacco.
  • Individual vs. family enrollment: Insurers can charge more for a plan that also covers a spouse and/or dependents.
  • Plan category: There are five plan categories – Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum, and catastrophic. The categories are based on how you and the plan share costs. Bronze plans usually have lower monthly premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs when you get care. Platinum plans usually have the highest premiums and lowest out-of-pocket costs.
I had no idea tobacco use was there. I signed up for an ACA plan last year and I don't recall any question relating to tobacco use. Interesting.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.