What a Dilema
#46
I'm not sure it's a case of knowing who's right or wrong, more a case of venturing opinions
#47
Banned





Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 699











If I hand money to anybody I expect it back, the same amount.
If that person then puts it into a bank and arranges a transfer to another country, that then is that persons responsibility, not mine.
If the person who originally asked stated that I should give it to that person to enter into there bank and arrange the transfer, that then is the borrowers responsibility.
If there was no third party and the borrower asked for £2,000, but to get £2,000 I needed to spend 2,800, then thats my responsibility.
The borrower should have been aware or made aware that 2,800 was needed and an agreement to either pay back 2,800 or refuse the loan or only agree to pay 2,000.
If either party arranged without first agreeing, then they need to find a middle ground, go legal or simply forget about the 800 Euro`s.
The lender is still responsible, if there elderly, then the borrower should morally be ashamed and pay the difference as they took advantage.
No I seek either a legal solution or beat 800 euros worth of damage on there property.
If that person then puts it into a bank and arranges a transfer to another country, that then is that persons responsibility, not mine.
If the person who originally asked stated that I should give it to that person to enter into there bank and arrange the transfer, that then is the borrowers responsibility.
If there was no third party and the borrower asked for £2,000, but to get £2,000 I needed to spend 2,800, then thats my responsibility.
The borrower should have been aware or made aware that 2,800 was needed and an agreement to either pay back 2,800 or refuse the loan or only agree to pay 2,000.
If either party arranged without first agreeing, then they need to find a middle ground, go legal or simply forget about the 800 Euro`s.
The lender is still responsible, if there elderly, then the borrower should morally be ashamed and pay the difference as they took advantage.
No I seek either a legal solution or beat 800 euros worth of damage on there property.
#48
Banned




Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 305










The borrower knows exactly what the right thing to do is but is obviously trying to find a way out. The borrower should have warned the lender that they might use the currency exchange rate to their own advantage when it came to paying back. It would have been up to the lender to take the risk or not.
#49
Forum Regular



Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 147
From: Cala Vedella, Ibiza











Only if they had known that their own relative my try a trick like this. It's no wonder the borrower didn't go to a bank. A bank wouldn't put up with this kind of crap.
#51
Thread Starter
Banned










Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,008











I wish I could say that all is resolved, but it is not.
But we have said that we do not want to hear another word from either side, we have just got back from visiting Galicia, and the atmosphere up there is very frosty.
Thankfully everyone respected our wish to stay out of it, but thanks to all of you, who tried to give advice.
But some things can never be fixed and this seems to be one of them, handbags at 30 paces may be the final answer,
Cheers to you all
#52
Forum Regular

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 30
From: UK until Feb




Thats an odd one.
My position would be if the person wanted to borrow £2,000 and received £2,000, then they repay £2,000.
It wasn`t there fault the Euro was high and since dropped.
It should have been disscussed before.
One option though would have been to pay the money back but into a savings account and wait for the exchange rate to return.
My position would be if the person wanted to borrow £2,000 and received £2,000, then they repay £2,000.
It wasn`t there fault the Euro was high and since dropped.
It should have been disscussed before.
One option though would have been to pay the money back but into a savings account and wait for the exchange rate to return.

However this is clearly an example of altruism and genuine helping hand when someone was vulnerable and needy. It is disgusting to read that individual apparently has such a short memory ..
Neither a lender nor a borrower be. Dodging the vaguely anti semitic aspect of the context, I think its pretty sound advise.
The borrower is a scumbag. I'd disown him/her entirely. They can't be an idiot, so they must have made the same mental association between morality and fairness we all have and consciously decided not to do the right thing. Any 'interest' accrued would be seen as a gift to the lender from a grateful relative. Not an opportunity to profit.
Nuff said.
Last edited by Harry Bohun; Jan 11th 2010 at 1:54 pm.
#53
Banned










Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz











If someone is generous enough to help you, they should not have to suffer for it.
#54
Forum Regular

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 30
From: UK until Feb




[QUOTE=bil;8240769]If someone is generous enough to help you, they should not have to suffer for it.[/QUOTE
Unless of course, they deserve it!
Unless of course, they deserve it!
#55
Banned





Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 699











Xmas time some friends got stuck and needed us to pay there tickets back home.
We paid the £800 shortfall, we recieved back last week the exact amount we paid, they paid all costs to transfer the money.
You can choose your friends, family your stuck with I guess.
We paid the £800 shortfall, we recieved back last week the exact amount we paid, they paid all costs to transfer the money.
You can choose your friends, family your stuck with I guess.
#56
The way I see it, the lender sent over to them 2800 euro so should get back 2800 euro. Look at it another way...if the borrowers had to borrow from a bank they would have had to pay interest but the lender kindly helped them out. The lender should get back the full amount they sent over. Simple
#57
The way I see it, the lender sent over to them 2800 euro so should get back 2800 euro. Look at it another way...if the borrowers had to borrow from a bank they would have had to pay interest but the lender kindly helped them out. The lender should get back the full amount they sent over. Simple
#58
In my opinion the lender was doing this person a favour. If they sent 2800 euro they should get back 2800 euro
#59
Banned





Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 699











Maybe its time for Mr Baseball Bat to step in and continue negotiations.
Pay or your head gets 8888ed.
Pay or your head gets 8888ed.
#60
Straw Man.










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.














