Understanding Spanish
Mar 23rd 2008 | 5:32 am
#94
Straw Man.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.
Yep
Mar 23rd 2008 | 5:36 am
#97
Straw Man.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.
Mar 23rd 2008 | 5:41 am
#99
Banned
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
Re: Understanding Spanish
'most men are that way'
Ah, the wonderful world of generalised sexism. Shall we begin that game??
Ah, the wonderful world of generalised sexism. Shall we begin that game??
Mar 23rd 2008 | 5:53 am
#101
Banned
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
Re: Understanding Spanish
Everything is for sale, except women and beer, both of which you rent.
Money is still the greatest aphrodisiac after power and prestige.
gotta go, off for eats at No 1 daughter's
Money is still the greatest aphrodisiac after power and prestige.
gotta go, off for eats at No 1 daughter's
Mar 23rd 2008 | 11:48 am
#102
Banned
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
Re: Understanding Spanish
Excellent meal, where were we.
Ah yes. The difference between the sexes is down to the strategy they need to maximise their chances of passing on their genes. For men, that is mostly a shoot at random system. The ideal would be to have a stable partner with whom to rear some children intensively while attempting to impregnate every available woman around. It's a strategy that many males employ.
For a woman, who has much fewer chances, care must be taken to select the gene mix of her offspring. She needs to breed with a male as high up the ladder she can reach. Ideally, she wants to breed with as many higher males as possible, while retaining one sucker to help her bring them up.
Alternatively she can pick one male and stick with him. Various combinations are observeable, all have differing rates of success under different conditions.
So how do you select a male? That depends, but largely there are three choices. Genetic fitness, money, power.
An easy choice is to select a male that has been chosen by another female, which is why so many women hit on married men. Women who select abusive partners time after time are IMO suffering from supranormal stimuli, in that they interpret aggression as dominance.
So I suppose you could say that the stereotype for men is that they will screw anything with a pulse, etc etc. Women will use sex to get a male that is dominant or rich, if they aren't one of the ones that locks onto scent as a measure of genetic fitness. (Those are the ones to go for.)
In other words many women will screw for money pure and simple.
Ah yes. The difference between the sexes is down to the strategy they need to maximise their chances of passing on their genes. For men, that is mostly a shoot at random system. The ideal would be to have a stable partner with whom to rear some children intensively while attempting to impregnate every available woman around. It's a strategy that many males employ.
For a woman, who has much fewer chances, care must be taken to select the gene mix of her offspring. She needs to breed with a male as high up the ladder she can reach. Ideally, she wants to breed with as many higher males as possible, while retaining one sucker to help her bring them up.
Alternatively she can pick one male and stick with him. Various combinations are observeable, all have differing rates of success under different conditions.
So how do you select a male? That depends, but largely there are three choices. Genetic fitness, money, power.
An easy choice is to select a male that has been chosen by another female, which is why so many women hit on married men. Women who select abusive partners time after time are IMO suffering from supranormal stimuli, in that they interpret aggression as dominance.
So I suppose you could say that the stereotype for men is that they will screw anything with a pulse, etc etc. Women will use sex to get a male that is dominant or rich, if they aren't one of the ones that locks onto scent as a measure of genetic fitness. (Those are the ones to go for.)
In other words many women will screw for money pure and simple.
Mar 23rd 2008 | 12:29 pm
#103
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,831
From: Sunny Manchester
Re: Understanding Spanish
Excellent meal, where were we.
Ah yes. The difference between the sexes is down to the strategy they need to maximise their chances of passing on their genes. For men, that is mostly a shoot at random system. The ideal would be to have a stable partner with whom to rear some children intensively while attempting to impregnate every available woman around. It's a strategy that many males employ.
For a woman, who has much fewer chances, care must be taken to select the gene mix of her offspring. She needs to breed with a male as high up the ladder she can reach. Ideally, she wants to breed with as many higher males as possible, while retaining one sucker to help her bring them up.
Alternatively she can pick one male and stick with him. Various combinations are observeable, all have differing rates of success under different conditions.
So how do you select a male? That depends, but largely there are three choices. Genetic fitness, money, power.
An easy choice is to select a male that has been chosen by another female, which is why so many women hit on married men. Women who select abusive partners time after time are IMO suffering from supranormal stimuli, in that they interpret aggression as dominance.
So I suppose you could say that the stereotype for men is that they will screw anything with a pulse, etc etc. Women will use sex to get a male that is dominant or rich, if they aren't one of the ones that locks onto scent as a measure of genetic fitness. (Those are the ones to go for.)
In other words many women will screw for money pure and simple.
Ah yes. The difference between the sexes is down to the strategy they need to maximise their chances of passing on their genes. For men, that is mostly a shoot at random system. The ideal would be to have a stable partner with whom to rear some children intensively while attempting to impregnate every available woman around. It's a strategy that many males employ.
For a woman, who has much fewer chances, care must be taken to select the gene mix of her offspring. She needs to breed with a male as high up the ladder she can reach. Ideally, she wants to breed with as many higher males as possible, while retaining one sucker to help her bring them up.
Alternatively she can pick one male and stick with him. Various combinations are observeable, all have differing rates of success under different conditions.
So how do you select a male? That depends, but largely there are three choices. Genetic fitness, money, power.
An easy choice is to select a male that has been chosen by another female, which is why so many women hit on married men. Women who select abusive partners time after time are IMO suffering from supranormal stimuli, in that they interpret aggression as dominance.
So I suppose you could say that the stereotype for men is that they will screw anything with a pulse, etc etc. Women will use sex to get a male that is dominant or rich, if they aren't one of the ones that locks onto scent as a measure of genetic fitness. (Those are the ones to go for.)
In other words many women will screw for money pure and simple.
Mar 23rd 2008 | 8:36 pm
#104
Straw Man.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.
Re: Understanding Spanish
Excellent meal, where were we.
Ah yes. The difference between the sexes is down to the strategy they need to maximise their chances of passing on their genes. For men, that is mostly a shoot at random system. The ideal would be to have a stable partner with whom to rear some children intensively while attempting to impregnate every available woman around. It's a strategy that many males employ.
For a woman, who has much fewer chances, care must be taken to select the gene mix of her offspring. She needs to breed with a male as high up the ladder she can reach. Ideally, she wants to breed with as many higher males as possible, while retaining one sucker to help her bring them up.
Alternatively she can pick one male and stick with him. Various combinations are observeable, all have differing rates of success under different conditions.
So how do you select a male? That depends, but largely there are three choices. Genetic fitness, money, power.
An easy choice is to select a male that has been chosen by another female, which is why so many women hit on married men. Women who select abusive partners time after time are IMO suffering from supranormal stimuli, in that they interpret aggression as dominance.
So I suppose you could say that the stereotype for men is that they will screw anything with a pulse, etc etc. Women will use sex to get a male that is dominant or rich, if they aren't one of the ones that locks onto scent as a measure of genetic fitness. (Those are the ones to go for.)
In other words many women will screw for money pure and simple.
Ah yes. The difference between the sexes is down to the strategy they need to maximise their chances of passing on their genes. For men, that is mostly a shoot at random system. The ideal would be to have a stable partner with whom to rear some children intensively while attempting to impregnate every available woman around. It's a strategy that many males employ.
For a woman, who has much fewer chances, care must be taken to select the gene mix of her offspring. She needs to breed with a male as high up the ladder she can reach. Ideally, she wants to breed with as many higher males as possible, while retaining one sucker to help her bring them up.
Alternatively she can pick one male and stick with him. Various combinations are observeable, all have differing rates of success under different conditions.
So how do you select a male? That depends, but largely there are three choices. Genetic fitness, money, power.
An easy choice is to select a male that has been chosen by another female, which is why so many women hit on married men. Women who select abusive partners time after time are IMO suffering from supranormal stimuli, in that they interpret aggression as dominance.
So I suppose you could say that the stereotype for men is that they will screw anything with a pulse, etc etc. Women will use sex to get a male that is dominant or rich, if they aren't one of the ones that locks onto scent as a measure of genetic fitness. (Those are the ones to go for.)
In other words many women will screw for money pure and simple.
Not even a good example of a flaming.
Mar 23rd 2008 | 9:37 pm
#105
Banned
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
Re: Understanding Spanish
That's because it wasn't meant to be.
Women make a fascinating study from a biological/ evolutionary standpoint. They are manipulative, deceitful and use sex as a weapon/tool. Have a look at how women look at each other when their guard is down. Pure evils.
Also never forget. Women delight in coming up with the old stereotype that men will screw anything etc etc etc. Great. Never let them forget it, because it gives us the perfect cop out to screw anything and blame it on them. After all they are much better than we are. Of course it then begs the question of why a woman will go after another man's husband, which they do with great ease. After all, she knows exactly what it will do to the other woman, her children etc. so what price sisterhood, eh?
Women make a fascinating study from a biological/ evolutionary standpoint. They are manipulative, deceitful and use sex as a weapon/tool. Have a look at how women look at each other when their guard is down. Pure evils.
Also never forget. Women delight in coming up with the old stereotype that men will screw anything etc etc etc. Great. Never let them forget it, because it gives us the perfect cop out to screw anything and blame it on them. After all they are much better than we are. Of course it then begs the question of why a woman will go after another man's husband, which they do with great ease. After all, she knows exactly what it will do to the other woman, her children etc. so what price sisterhood, eh?
