![]() |
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 9803961)
You do that to my kids and I'd have you up for assault.
|
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by Fredbargate
(Post 9804024)
I doubt that you and I will ever meet, however if the situation above did occur I would be shoving the kids back up the hole they came out of.
|
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 9803961)
You do that to my kids and I'd have you up for assault. It's my job or the police's to reprimand my kids not some random member of the public. You can ask them politely to pack it in, you can report them but you touch them and swear at them and I'd give you hell. And how you consider your actions show those two boys the right way to behave is beyond me. You simply showed them that you got away with being a foul mouthed bully so they will.
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 9803982)
But you consider it ok to slap an unknown boy who is pushing and messing about? I think not. I'm not living in cloud cuckoo land, I'm simply telling you what I would do if you behaved like that to my children.
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 9803993)
It all comes down to what is reasonable. If someone tried to nick my bag I would have no hesitation whatsoever in using reasonable force to stop them or to get it back.
Defending your self or property from a mugger by 'giving him a backhander' is probably reasonable.
Originally Posted by Fredbargate
(Post 9804024)
I doubt that you and I will ever meet, however if the situation above did occur I would be shoving the kids back up the hole they came out of.
|
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
I find it hard to believe that there are people out there who do not think you are allowed to defend yourself if attacked? The degree of force you are allowed to use depend on the circumstances. If someone tries to mug you, you are certainly allowed to give them a backhander, or even a hard kick in the balls, or two.
To the best of my knowledge, every civilised country has a law which even allows its people to make a citizen's arrest when appropriate. It doesn't even have to be an attack on the citizen himself, an attack on a fellow citizen or property is sufficient. I saw a news item recently where four robbers used sledgehammers on a shop in Oxford Street. As they made their escape on two motor cycles a brave member of the public tried to kick out at the robbers. If he had connected it could have caused serious injury to the fleeing robber. Was the member of the public justified in his action? I don't have to re-state my own views, but I have serious doubts about what other commentators on this thread may think. |
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by jimenato
(Post 9803993)
It all comes down to what is reasonable. If someone tried to nick my bag I would have no hesitation whatsoever in using reasonable force to stop them or to get it back.
Defending your self or property from a mugger by 'giving him a backhander' is probably reasonable. |
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by gruffbrown
(Post 9804043)
Huh :confused:
|
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Another stupid disrespectful little tosser.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ing-trial.html He wasn't even bright enough to get his boyfriend to cover his story and yet he was on jury service. His parents are obviously just as stupid, bleating on about his sentence even though he was released after only four days. Gotta wonder how many of them ever do grow up. |
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 9804268)
Does he know something we don't? Is Moneypenny fit? Is there more to know about this?
|
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by rugbymatt
(Post 9804268)
Does he know something we don't? Is Moneypenny fit? Is there more to know about this?
It should make for an interesting spectacle, if nothing else. :rofl: |
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Some people's attitude to crime really beggars belief. A couple of months ago a man in Cheshire fatally stabbed a burglar in his house, in the belief that the safety of his wife and children was at risk (for once, common sense prevailed and the police confirmed that he would not face any charges).
The burglar's family put flowers and messages bemoaning his death outside the family's house!!!!! (the family that was burgled, that is). If that had been my house, I would have demanded that the police remove them immediately, and if they didn't do it, I would have. |
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
I'm quite keen to find out what Moneypenny's gaping hole is like now!
|
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by Lynn R
(Post 9804368)
If that had been my house, I would have demanded that the police remove them immediately, and if they didn't do it, I would have.
|
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by fatbrit
(Post 9804395)
Fanning the flames is great, isn't it?
|
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by HBG
(Post 9804061)
I find it hard to believe that there are people out there who do not think you are allowed to defend yourself if attacked? The degree of force you are allowed to use depend on the circumstances. If someone tries to mug you, you are certainly allowed to give them a backhander, or even a hard kick in the balls, or two.
To the best of my knowledge, every civilised country has a law which even allows its people to make a citizen's arrest when appropriate. It doesn't even have to be an attack on the citizen himself, an attack on a fellow citizen or property is sufficient. I saw a news item recently where four robbers used sledgehammers on a shop in Oxford Street. As they made their escape on two motor cycles a brave member of the public tried to kick out at the robbers. If he had connected it could have caused serious injury to the fleeing robber. Was the member of the public justified in his action? I don't have to re-state my own views, but I have serious doubts about what other commentators on this thread may think. the mop would get a larger sentence. the robbers would have extenuating circumstances, such as their father was a drunk, their mother left their father, someone stole their teddy bear when they were young.......I won't labour the point. |
Re: One for the do gooders to jump on
Originally Posted by Lynn R
(Post 9804368)
Some people's attitude to crime really beggars belief. A couple of months ago a man in Cheshire fatally stabbed a burglar in his house, in the belief that the safety of his wife and children was at risk (for once, common sense prevailed and the police confirmed that he would not face any charges).
The burglar's family put flowers and messages bemoaning his death outside the family's house!!!!! (the family that was burgled, that is). If that had been my house, I would have demanded that the police remove them immediately, and if they didn't do it, I would have. the laws of stalking could be used to get rid of them . |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:58 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.