Don't it always seem to go............
#61
Banned










Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz











Nope, they exist in pairs, one left and one right. Pulling them apart gives you two pairs instead of two singles.
It's a bit like having an apple and a pear stuck together, and when you pull them apart, the apple grows a pear on its side, and the pear grows an apple, instantly and from nowhere.
One of the few examples of a free lunch.
It's a bit like having an apple and a pear stuck together, and when you pull them apart, the apple grows a pear on its side, and the pear grows an apple, instantly and from nowhere.
One of the few examples of a free lunch.
#63
Banned










Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz











Particle physics 101.
Did you know that everything is madeup mostly of nothing?
Did you know that everything is madeup mostly of nothing?
#64
Surely you can't have a lefthand quark on it's own, if you have one quark then it must have a left and right hand, so with one left hand quark you would have two left hands and one right as opposed to one right hand quark that would have two right hands and one left. I think

"A realization of the ‘‘flavor-democracy’’ approach to quark and lepton masses is provided in the context of the standard model with a horizontal S3 permutation symmetry. In this model, t and b quarks pick up mass at the tree level, c, s-quark and τ-lepton masses arise at the one-loop level, u, d, and μ masses at the two-loop level, and the electron mass at the three-loop level, thus reproducing the observed hierarchial structure without fine tuning of the Yukawa couplings. The pattern of quark mixing angles also emerges naturally, with Vus,Vcb≊O(ε), Vub≊O(ε2), where ε is a loop expansion parameter."
#65
Don`t worry if it`s left or right, you can mix them.
"A realization of the ‘‘flavor-democracy’’ approach to quark and lepton masses is provided in the context of the standard model with a horizontal S3 permutation symmetry. In this model, t and b quarks pick up mass at the tree level, c, s-quark and τ-lepton masses arise at the one-loop level, u, d, and μ masses at the two-loop level, and the electron mass at the three-loop level, thus reproducing the observed hierarchial structure without fine tuning of the Yukawa couplings. The pattern of quark mixing angles also emerges naturally, with Vus,Vcb≊O(ε), Vub≊O(ε2), where ε is a loop expansion parameter."
"A realization of the ‘‘flavor-democracy’’ approach to quark and lepton masses is provided in the context of the standard model with a horizontal S3 permutation symmetry. In this model, t and b quarks pick up mass at the tree level, c, s-quark and τ-lepton masses arise at the one-loop level, u, d, and μ masses at the two-loop level, and the electron mass at the three-loop level, thus reproducing the observed hierarchial structure without fine tuning of the Yukawa couplings. The pattern of quark mixing angles also emerges naturally, with Vus,Vcb≊O(ε), Vub≊O(ε2), where ε is a loop expansion parameter."
WHOOSH
#66
Banned










Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz











Thee and me both, and if Jdr can explain that simply, I will be deeply impressed!
#70
Banned










Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz











Oh no!
I am easily confused. What was posted, I simply don't understand. Again, that's not a first, there's an awful lot I don't understand.
Neutrons, protons, electrons, photons, leptons, baryons, gluons, muons, bosons, - it's genuinely hard to remember which is which, let alone understanding what exactly the properties of quarks are. They have colour, charm, spin and up or down, and more besides.
To much of that and I will have a pressing need to go and lie down.
I am easily confused. What was posted, I simply don't understand. Again, that's not a first, there's an awful lot I don't understand.
Neutrons, protons, electrons, photons, leptons, baryons, gluons, muons, bosons, - it's genuinely hard to remember which is which, let alone understanding what exactly the properties of quarks are. They have colour, charm, spin and up or down, and more besides.
To much of that and I will have a pressing need to go and lie down.
#71
Oh no!
I am easily confused. What was posted, I simply don't understand. Again, that's not a first, there's an awful lot I don't understand.
Neutrons, protons, electrons, photons, leptons, baryons, gluons, muons, bosons, - it's genuinely hard to remember which is which, let alone understanding what exactly the properties of quarks are. They have colour, charm, spin and up or down, and more besides.
To much of that and I will have a pressing need to go and lie down.
I am easily confused. What was posted, I simply don't understand. Again, that's not a first, there's an awful lot I don't understand.
Neutrons, protons, electrons, photons, leptons, baryons, gluons, muons, bosons, - it's genuinely hard to remember which is which, let alone understanding what exactly the properties of quarks are. They have colour, charm, spin and up or down, and more besides.
To much of that and I will have a pressing need to go and lie down.



