Cman
#3
Re: Cman
I do believe he flounced off. Not because of the views on this board (he attracted quite a bit of flak from time to time), but because he was disheartened by English-speakers responses to a newspaper article, and what he saw as British ignorance of Spain. I'm one of those who miss his contributions, but I suspect there are many who don't.
#4
Re: Cman
I do believe he flounced off. Not because of the views on this board (he attracted quite a bit of flak from time to time), but because he was disheartened by English-speakers responses to a newspaper article, and what he saw as British ignorance of Spain. I'm one of those who miss his contributions, but I suspect there are many who don't.
#7
Straw Man.
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.
Posts: 46,302
Re: Cman
I thought Cricketman was a woman?
#8
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Living in a good place
Posts: 8,824
Re: Cman
He had a spanish wife and all her relatives had top earning professional jobs
#13
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: London (mainly)/Oliva
Posts: 2,137
Re: Cman
The forum would be a duller place without argument and in my view adds to it.
I do think some posters are mavericks who just want to be argumentative for the sake of it and I am always surprised(sadly) how personal and vitriolic some of the posters become. I try to avoid those posters.
The majority of posters will join in the debate and see it as no more than that. You also have to realise many of the replies are tongue in cheek (or at least I hope so!)between the posters.
I do think some posters are mavericks who just want to be argumentative for the sake of it and I am always surprised(sadly) how personal and vitriolic some of the posters become. I try to avoid those posters.
The majority of posters will join in the debate and see it as no more than that. You also have to realise many of the replies are tongue in cheek (or at least I hope so!)between the posters.