Choice of SUV
#46
Here are some examples of list prices (imports and domestic, with BC HST included) for a variety of models sold here and in the UK. Green for cheaper in Canada, blue for cheaper in UK):
Mercedes ML350
Canada = $64,288 UK = £40,910 @x1.6 conversion rate = $65,456
Subaru WRX Sti
Canada = $46,614 UK = £28,000 @x1.6 conversion rate = $44,800
Ford Fiesta
Canada = $16,070 UK = £11,545 @x1.6 conversion rate = $18,632
Audi A3 TDi
Canada = $39,536 UK = £21,085 @x1.6 conversion rate = $33,736
Volvo XC70
Canada = $34,714 UK = £21,405 @x1.6 conversion rate = $34,248
Toyota Prius
Canada = $22,237 UK = £27,800 @x1.6 conversion rate = $44,480
BMW X5 xDrive50i
Canada = $83,216 UK = £55,080 @x1.6 conversion rate = $88,128
So, from that small sample it's apparent imports sometimes actually cost less here. On the current exchange rate, Volvo prices are almost identical, whereas Toyota's are much less expensive in Canada.
Take into account often far longer servicing intervals (my ML only requires a service every 15,000kms, whereas my Ford truck is every 6,000kms), then running costs can be less expensive too.
Last edited by R I C H; Aug 3rd 2010 at 8:09 am.
#47
Every day's a school day







Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,667
From: Was Calgary back in Edmonton again !!











I was using Audi as my basis and my own experience. and the fact service periods are shorter in Canada as against the uk..My Audi in the uk was every 20,000 miles = 32,000 kms and the cost was cheaper per service..so alot more servicing in Canada and cost per service more expensive.
#48
I was using Audi as my basis and my own experience. and the fact service periods are shorter in Canada as against the uk..My Audi in the uk was every 20,000 miles = 32,000 kms and the cost was cheaper per service..so alot more servicing in Canada and cost per service more expensive.
#49
I was under the impression that model of Jag was only AWD, it was only after the ford take over that , using the Mondeo platform, for the S type it became a FWD car, but i now assume the older ones were RWD
Either way back on Topic im a fan of the Toyota Highlander V6. As for the Sate fe - after using the father in laws V6 Sante Fe I was impressed by it.
Either way back on Topic im a fan of the Toyota Highlander V6. As for the Sate fe - after using the father in laws V6 Sante Fe I was impressed by it.
#51
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 761
From: Sherwood Park - Alberta











After digesting some good and some not so good comments here, we basically come down to 2 vehicles.
Mitsubushi Outlander (2010)
Hyundai Santa Fe (2010)
Santa Fe has more gadgets, however there is not a lot between them to drive and the Mitsubushi may be smoother with the CVT.
The Hyudai dealer I have had most of the dialouge with and has tried to rip me off a few times - but the internet site can get you a price close enough to fire bullets back.
So what I am asking now, while waiting for the bank (line of credit) are there any owners who have either and what do you think of either.
Thanks
JET
Mitsubushi Outlander (2010)
Hyundai Santa Fe (2010)
Santa Fe has more gadgets, however there is not a lot between them to drive and the Mitsubushi may be smoother with the CVT.
The Hyudai dealer I have had most of the dialouge with and has tried to rip me off a few times - but the internet site can get you a price close enough to fire bullets back.
So what I am asking now, while waiting for the bank (line of credit) are there any owners who have either and what do you think of either.
Thanks
JET
Last edited by JET747; Oct 16th 2010 at 4:00 pm. Reason: Extra Info
#52
After digesting some good and some not so good comments here, we basically come down to 2 vehicles.
Mitsubushi Outlander (2010)
Hyundai Santa Fe (2010)
http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...lies/frown.gif
Santa Fe has more gadgets, however there is not a lot between them to drive and the Mitsubushi may be smoother with the CVT.
The Hyudai dealer I have had most of the dialouge with and has tried to rip me off a few times - but the internet site can get you a price close enough to fire bullets back.
So what I am asking now, while waiting for the bank (line of credit) are there any owners who have either and what do you think of either.
Thanks
JET
Mitsubushi Outlander (2010)
Hyundai Santa Fe (2010)
http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...lies/frown.gif
Santa Fe has more gadgets, however there is not a lot between them to drive and the Mitsubushi may be smoother with the CVT.
The Hyudai dealer I have had most of the dialouge with and has tried to rip me off a few times - but the internet site can get you a price close enough to fire bullets back.
So what I am asking now, while waiting for the bank (line of credit) are there any owners who have either and what do you think of either.
Thanks
JET

#53
http://www.gnb.ca/0162/tax/pvttppt-e.asp
"Purchase and/or Acquisition from a Private Individual - Motor Vehicles (Provincial Vehicle Tax - PVT):
All motor vehicles purchased and/or acquired privately (from a non-registrant) are subject to a 13% Provincial Vehicle Tax (PVT). This Provincial Vehicle Tax is administered by the Revenue & Taxation Division of the Department of Finance. This tax is paid upon registration of the vehicle at a Service New Brunswick Centre. Any inquiries on the Provincial Vehicle Tax should be made to the Revenue & Taxation Division, Department of Finance (506-453-2404)."
IN NB, the tax is based on the bill of sale, they get you to sign an affidavit attesting to that fact that you paid x amount which becomes the tax assessed value.
In NS they use a book value, so if the bill of sale you present is lower, you will pay the lowest book value.
So yes, the taxman still wants his cut.....
Last edited by airbornesapper; Oct 17th 2010 at 12:49 am.
#54
Forum Regular



Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 190






Steve_P
the man who has to have the last word on mpg . . .
is there a weight issue with suv v car or is most of the suv just light superstrucutre ?
dont you have a problem with the car lower to the ground with heavy snow and slush ? - thought a higher up vehicle would be an advantage but you are the man on the ground
the man who has to have the last word on mpg . . .

is there a weight issue with suv v car or is most of the suv just light superstrucutre ?
dont you have a problem with the car lower to the ground with heavy snow and slush ? - thought a higher up vehicle would be an advantage but you are the man on the ground
Last edited by 2008orbust; Oct 19th 2010 at 12:14 am.
#55
The one time the unploughed driveway proved impassable in the Beetle, (spring, two feet of new wet snow), it also defeated the LC. I launched effectively but got stuck in the windrow. At that point I needed the John Deere with chains, that's good in snow but not efficient for commuting.
Again, I don't hate SUVs but they're not better for driving on roads in Canada than a minivan or, indeed, a little faggy thing.
On edit: the features that make the LC effective in fields of snow are:
- lots of ground clearance
- locking hubs
- manual gearbox
- no traction control
If wanting an SUV is about driving in difficult conditions, which of course it isn't, all of these are essential. In 2WD high, driven gently with hubs unlocked, the LC can return 14mpg.
Last edited by dbd33; Oct 18th 2010 at 11:37 pm.
#56
Thread Starter
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 761
From: Sherwood Park - Alberta











so is that Santa Fe or Outlander ?
we always seem to sidetrack from what the purpose is and I am none the wiser.
JET
we always seem to sidetrack from what the purpose is and I am none the wiser.
JET
#58
Steve_P
the man who has to have the last word on mpg . . .
is there a weight issue with suv v car or is most of the suv just light superstrucutre ?
dont you have a problem with the car lower to the ground with heavy snow and slush ? - thought a higher up vehicle would be an advantage but you are the man on the ground
the man who has to have the last word on mpg . . .

is there a weight issue with suv v car or is most of the suv just light superstrucutre ?
dont you have a problem with the car lower to the ground with heavy snow and slush ? - thought a higher up vehicle would be an advantage but you are the man on the ground
Ground clearance has not been an issue for me here, ever, and I drive a Honda Civic most of the time. A subaru with snow tires on is largely impervious to the winter, as long as you can actually see where you are going. I used to own a Jeep, the high seating position is nice sometimes, but the rest of the experience not that great, and expensive to run. On the other hand the height also means inherently poorer stearing response due to higher center of gravity... I choose closer to the ground having tried both.
Unless you tow something, you really dont need an SUV. Having said that I was towing a borrowed trailer behind a borrowed SantaFe this weekend past, and it was OK, but it was an older one and it showed... check engine, brake and ABS lights on, tailgate wouldnt open...at 240k km.
Last edited by iaink; Oct 19th 2010 at 2:55 am.
#60
Most of the time these things dont signify much anyway

If the window part of the tailgate didnt open it would have been a bit more inconvenient...




