![]() |
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by Norm_uk
(Post 11413945)
Are these people mentally ill? T
|
Re: Scottish Independence
Now they cant even agree on the West Lothian Question.
|
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by alfrombarking
(Post 11415222)
Now they cant even agree on the West Lothian Question.
|
Re: Scottish Independence
"SNP becomes UK's third biggest party in wake of indyref defeat"
"According to the party's chief executive Peter Murrell, more than 22,000 supporters joined its ranks over the last four days, taking the number carrying a party card from under 26,000 to more than 50,000 - a leap of 92 per cent." |
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by Inselaffen
(Post 11415228)
I don't think Labour can put forward any valid arguments. They just know they are screwed if they lose the votes of their Scottish MP's
Perhaps they should split England into regions, but better ones than before - with some more attention paid to regional identity, but still with the aim of approximately equal populations. Give each one a vote on if it wants devolved powers (except London, which already has them). If they say yes, they get an assembly/parliament. If no then power remains at Westminster. There'd be some provision for being able to have future votes if there is sufficient demand for change. Give each regional assembly/parliament the same powers, to remove any suggestion of favouritism. Then reform the Lords. Make it 100% elected, with each region getting an equal share of the seats, and holding its own PR election to divide up those seats. |
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by alfrombarking
(Post 11415342)
That's true and I don't think stopping Scottish MPs from voting on devolved matters will work as anything other than a short term fudge. It'll lead to accusations of different classes of MPs, and will cause big problems if there is any disagreement on if an issue should be full-UK or non-Scot.
Perhaps they should split England into regions, but better ones than before - with some more attention paid to regional identity, but still with the aim of approximately equal populations. Give each one a vote on if it wants devolved powers (except London, which already has them). If they say yes, they get an assembly/parliament. If no then power remains at Westminster. There'd be some provision for being able to have future votes if there is sufficient demand for change. Give each regional assembly/parliament the same powers, to remove any suggestion of favouritism. Then reform the Lords. Make it 100% elected, with each region getting an equal share of the seats, and holding its own PR election to divide up those seats. |
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by Inselaffen
(Post 11415348)
You already have different classes of MP's. Scottish MP's get to vote on matters that do not concern their constituents. English MP's do not.
|
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by alfrombarking
(Post 11415362)
I wonder what will be Cameron's next move
|
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by Norm_uk
(Post 11415406)
Power sharing with Nigel Farage and the long overdue rebirth of the British Empire ;)
N. |
Re: Scottish Independence
I think, if some English regions receive powers and others don't, we will end up in a serious mess. I would give all English regions the same powers, and let them decide how they should operate.
|
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by alfrombarking
(Post 11415433)
I think, if some English regions receive powers and others don't, we will end up in a serious mess. I would give all English regions the same powers, and let them decide how they should operate.
|
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by Inselaffen
(Post 11415348)
You already have different classes of MP's. Scottish MP's get to vote on matters that do not concern their constituents. English MP's do not.
|
Re: Scottish Independence
It's an appropriate place to put it even if it's time for this thread to retire
But the SNP have hit 60,000 members more than doubling membership since Friday and I cannot begin to describe how much this amuses me and the thought of how much it must piss off Scottish labour amuses me even more |
Re: Scottish Independence
I don't imagine Scottish Labour gives much of a toss. 30,000 new members is a drop in the ocean, and those 30,000 probably weren't going to vote for Labour anyway. And if they care enough about Scottish independence to join the SNP, why didn't they bother joining *before* the vote? Not that it would have made a scrap of difference, of course, any more than it makes any difference now.
Rather telling to look at the electoral map showing the strength of the vote by council area. Says it all, really. The SNP's still got a lot of convincing to do outside of the deprived areas of Glasgow. http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l1...ps5cae0bc9.jpg |
Re: Scottish Independence
Originally Posted by Eeyore
(Post 11417234)
I don't imagine Scottish Labour gives much of a toss. 30,000 new members is a drop in the ocean, and those 30,000 probably weren't going to vote for Labour anyway. And if they care enough about Scottish independence to join the SNP, why didn't they bother joining *before* the vote? Not that it would have made a scrap of difference, of course, any more than it makes any difference now.
Rather telling to look at the electoral map showing the strength of the vote by council area. Says it all, really. The SNP's still got a lot of convincing to do outside of the deprived areas of Glasgow. http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l1...ps5cae0bc9.jpg It fails to show things like a .2% difference in vote in one council is what won a no vote there. Not quite the whole picture you might say |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:05 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.