Sunrise at Stonehenge?
Apr 9th 2005, 10:13 am
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Sunrise at Stonehenge?
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:52:27 +0200, Magda <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:38:55 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, nitram <[email protected]> arranged
>some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:24:34 +0100, "Ian" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> ... >
> ... >
> ... >Magda wrote:
> ... >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:39:36 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, "Ian"
> ... >> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >>
> ... >> ...
> ... >> ... Piss taker! B & W with a nice filter on the lens can still look
> ... >> moody and ... effective, even with a sunrise. Then again, maybe I'm
> ... >> just being ... charitable! ;)
> ... >>
> ... >> You betcha. Filters were not much around those days either, I
> ... >> presume... Maybe for professionals only.
> ... >
> ... >Can we get a look at the pic?
> ...
> ... Which? My 45 year old b&w sunrise at the summer solstice?
>Yes.
Euro250 a copy.
wrote:
>On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:38:55 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, nitram <[email protected]> arranged
>some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:24:34 +0100, "Ian" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> ... >
> ... >
> ... >Magda wrote:
> ... >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:39:36 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, "Ian"
> ... >> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >>
> ... >> ...
> ... >> ... Piss taker! B & W with a nice filter on the lens can still look
> ... >> moody and ... effective, even with a sunrise. Then again, maybe I'm
> ... >> just being ... charitable! ;)
> ... >>
> ... >> You betcha. Filters were not much around those days either, I
> ... >> presume... Maybe for professionals only.
> ... >
> ... >Can we get a look at the pic?
> ...
> ... Which? My 45 year old b&w sunrise at the summer solstice?
>Yes.
Euro250 a copy.
Apr 9th 2005, 10:31 am
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Sunrise at Stonehenge?
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:13:32 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, nitram <[email protected]> arranged
some electrons, so they looked like this :
... On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:52:27 +0200, Magda <[email protected]>
... wrote:
...
... >On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:38:55 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, nitram <[email protected]> arranged
... >some electrons, so they looked like this :
... >
... > ... On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:24:34 +0100, "Ian" <[email protected]> wrote:
... > ...
... > ... >
... > ... >
... > ... >Magda wrote:
... > ... >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:39:36 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, "Ian"
... > ... >> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
... > ... >>
... > ... >> ...
... > ... >> ... Piss taker! B & W with a nice filter on the lens can still look
... > ... >> moody and ... effective, even with a sunrise. Then again, maybe I'm
... > ... >> just being ... charitable! ;)
... > ... >>
... > ... >> You betcha. Filters were not much around those days either, I
... > ... >> presume... Maybe for professionals only.
... > ... >
... > ... >Can we get a look at the pic?
... > ...
... > ... Which? My 45 year old b&w sunrise at the summer solstice?
... >
... >Yes.
...
... Euro250 a copy.
Crook.
some electrons, so they looked like this :
... On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:52:27 +0200, Magda <[email protected]>
... wrote:
...
... >On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:38:55 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, nitram <[email protected]> arranged
... >some electrons, so they looked like this :
... >
... > ... On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:24:34 +0100, "Ian" <[email protected]> wrote:
... > ...
... > ... >
... > ... >
... > ... >Magda wrote:
... > ... >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:39:36 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, "Ian"
... > ... >> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
... > ... >>
... > ... >> ...
... > ... >> ... Piss taker! B & W with a nice filter on the lens can still look
... > ... >> moody and ... effective, even with a sunrise. Then again, maybe I'm
... > ... >> just being ... charitable! ;)
... > ... >>
... > ... >> You betcha. Filters were not much around those days either, I
... > ... >> presume... Maybe for professionals only.
... > ... >
... > ... >Can we get a look at the pic?
... > ...
... > ... Which? My 45 year old b&w sunrise at the summer solstice?
... >
... >Yes.
...
... Euro250 a copy.
Crook.
Apr 9th 2005, 11:30 am
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Sunrise at Stonehenge?
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:31:58 +0200, Magda <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:13:32 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, nitram <[email protected]> arranged
>some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:52:27 +0200, Magda <[email protected]>
> ... wrote:
> ...
> ... >On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:38:55 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, nitram <[email protected]> arranged
> ... >some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >
> ... > ... On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:24:34 +0100, "Ian" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... > ...
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >Magda wrote:
> ... > ... >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:39:36 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, "Ian"
> ... > ... >> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... > ... >>
> ... > ... >> ...
> ... > ... >> ... Piss taker! B & W with a nice filter on the lens can still look
> ... > ... >> moody and ... effective, even with a sunrise. Then again, maybe I'm
> ... > ... >> just being ... charitable! ;)
> ... > ... >>
> ... > ... >> You betcha. Filters were not much around those days either, I
> ... > ... >> presume... Maybe for professionals only.
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >Can we get a look at the pic?
> ... > ...
> ... > ... Which? My 45 year old b&w sunrise at the summer solstice?
> ... >
> ... >Yes.
> ...
> ... Euro250 a copy.
>Crook.
Cheap at half the price :-)
wrote:
>On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:13:32 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, nitram <[email protected]> arranged
>some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:52:27 +0200, Magda <[email protected]>
> ... wrote:
> ...
> ... >On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:38:55 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, nitram <[email protected]> arranged
> ... >some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... >
> ... > ... On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:24:34 +0100, "Ian" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... > ...
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >Magda wrote:
> ... > ... >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:39:36 +0100, in rec.travel.europe, "Ian"
> ... > ... >> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... > ... >>
> ... > ... >> ...
> ... > ... >> ... Piss taker! B & W with a nice filter on the lens can still look
> ... > ... >> moody and ... effective, even with a sunrise. Then again, maybe I'm
> ... > ... >> just being ... charitable! ;)
> ... > ... >>
> ... > ... >> You betcha. Filters were not much around those days either, I
> ... > ... >> presume... Maybe for professionals only.
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... >Can we get a look at the pic?
> ... > ...
> ... > ... Which? My 45 year old b&w sunrise at the summer solstice?
> ... >
> ... >Yes.
> ...
> ... Euro250 a copy.
>Crook.
Cheap at half the price :-)
Apr 9th 2005, 9:37 pm
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Sunrise at Stonehenge?
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:10:46 -0700, Hatunen <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:37:14 +0200, nitram <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>On 8 Apr 2005 08:56:24 -0700, "Hania" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>Why not try sunset instead of sunrise,no need to get up so early.
>>>Prints and postcards are often better than any photographs you take
>>>yourself,so take your time,don't knock yourself out, and call into the
>>>local souvenir shop
>>because the solstice alignments are at sunrise.
>>Why not use a PC to insert the sun in the image in a suitably dramatic
>>position?
>Are you even allowed to get in a position where the solstice
>alignments are visible?
One was in the nineteen sixties. I don't know what the situation is
now.
>On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:37:14 +0200, nitram <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>On 8 Apr 2005 08:56:24 -0700, "Hania" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>Why not try sunset instead of sunrise,no need to get up so early.
>>>Prints and postcards are often better than any photographs you take
>>>yourself,so take your time,don't knock yourself out, and call into the
>>>local souvenir shop
>>because the solstice alignments are at sunrise.
>>Why not use a PC to insert the sun in the image in a suitably dramatic
>>position?
>Are you even allowed to get in a position where the solstice
>alignments are visible?
One was in the nineteen sixties. I don't know what the situation is
now.
Apr 11th 2005, 7:40 am
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Sunrise at Stonehenge?
Following up to Hania
>Prints and postcards are often better than any photographs you take
>yourself,so take your time,don't knock yourself out, and call into the
>local souvenir shop
why go at all?
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-Photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
>Prints and postcards are often better than any photographs you take
>yourself,so take your time,don't knock yourself out, and call into the
>local souvenir shop
why go at all?
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-Photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
