LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
Aug 22nd 2005 | 12:57 pm
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
"gordon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] oups.com...
> The Air Force was very upset when Pan Am stopped serving the Far East.
> As long as Pan Am served the Far East, the Air force only ran the
> second worst airline in Asia.
> Old joke but a lot of truth from one who flew both regularly from
> Okinawa 76-79.
:))
That was then. Nowadays, I imagine, the Air Force could make
quite a lot of money if they chose to sell tickets to some carefully
pre-screened civilian travelers.
I know I wouldn't mind flying next to a bunch of guys with M16's.
Crappy service, tasteless food, noise, or foul language, notwithstanding.
MN
--
Equitable Communications Promise: Milton Noyes does
not discriminate against newsgroup respondents on the
basis of age, sex, race, color, national origin, ancestry,
creed, pregnancy, religion, marital or parental status,
sexual orientation, physical, mental, emotional, or learning
disability or handicap.
news:[email protected] oups.com...
> The Air Force was very upset when Pan Am stopped serving the Far East.
> As long as Pan Am served the Far East, the Air force only ran the
> second worst airline in Asia.
> Old joke but a lot of truth from one who flew both regularly from
> Okinawa 76-79.
:))
That was then. Nowadays, I imagine, the Air Force could make
quite a lot of money if they chose to sell tickets to some carefully
pre-screened civilian travelers.
I know I wouldn't mind flying next to a bunch of guys with M16's.
Crappy service, tasteless food, noise, or foul language, notwithstanding.
MN
--
Equitable Communications Promise: Milton Noyes does
not discriminate against newsgroup respondents on the
basis of age, sex, race, color, national origin, ancestry,
creed, pregnancy, religion, marital or parental status,
sexual orientation, physical, mental, emotional, or learning
disability or handicap.
Aug 22nd 2005 | 2:01 pm
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
In article <[email protected]>,
Milton Noyes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do you think you can get the same quality service on
> American Airlines as the Gringo next to you, if you
> don't speak any English, only Spanish? No way Jose!
> There is always going to be a slight difference here.
That is hard to understand for the "les anglo-saxon"
"masters of the universe". They leave the US expecting
that everyone will speak perfect English to them.
Then they come back from France saying that the French
were rude to them. Well guess what, the Earth doesn't
rotate around them, not yet.
--
"Imbéciles réveillez vous!"
Jerzy Pawlowski ([email protected])
Milton Noyes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do you think you can get the same quality service on
> American Airlines as the Gringo next to you, if you
> don't speak any English, only Spanish? No way Jose!
> There is always going to be a slight difference here.
That is hard to understand for the "les anglo-saxon"
"masters of the universe". They leave the US expecting
that everyone will speak perfect English to them.
Then they come back from France saying that the French
were rude to them. Well guess what, the Earth doesn't
rotate around them, not yet.
--
"Imbéciles réveillez vous!"
Jerzy Pawlowski ([email protected])
Aug 22nd 2005 | 2:30 pm
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
m.berger wrote:
> Cidebur wrote:
>
>> DK wrote:
>>> LOT tickets for our recent Chicago-Vienna trip
>> LOT is not serving Chicago-Vienna.
>> Poland has problem not only with
>> PLL LOT, and everything is thanks to
>> bandit Hitler, murderer Stalin and
>> traitor Roosevelt.
>> Just to remember...
>> wk
>
>
> Pilsudski is to blame
Nah! It all goes back to Sobievski bailing out the Hapsburgs. It would
have been better with the muslims on the border.
> Cidebur wrote:
>
>> DK wrote:
>>> LOT tickets for our recent Chicago-Vienna trip
>> LOT is not serving Chicago-Vienna.
>> Poland has problem not only with
>> PLL LOT, and everything is thanks to
>> bandit Hitler, murderer Stalin and
>> traitor Roosevelt.
>> Just to remember...
>> wk
>
>
> Pilsudski is to blame
Nah! It all goes back to Sobievski bailing out the Hapsburgs. It would
have been better with the muslims on the border.
Aug 22nd 2005 | 4:17 pm
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
*waiting an hour has nothing to do with LOT airlines
*buying your tickets a week, a month, 6 months, a year or even 10 years in
advance dont make any difference about seating if its not prebooked. also
the reason you waited 75 mins to checkin was prob the fact you was near the
last to checkin and the queue just piled up and hence you got crappy seats
too
*Polish airline, polish crew........ being english or american, you cant
expect everyone to just speak english. If you like that then i'd guess
maybe next time travel with either an american or british carrier.
*you not notice not everyone has the same taste buds, think poor souls who
dont like strong taste what can they do about it, if it was suited to your
needs? put water in to dilute the taste? next time try looking for the salt
and pepper.
*if you complained about everything then i guess maybe they were avoiding
you.
--
Electrical Kettle instant hot water (home, office)
Platinums.co.uk - or remember this
Kettle.us.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
\\ l l l //
(@ @)
____________ oOO-(_)-OOo____________
"DK" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> LOT tickets for our recent Chicago-Vienna trip were hundred-and-some $$
> less than comparable United and Lufthansa. After some deliberations,
> we decided to give this post-Communist company a benefit of doubt.
> BIG MISTAKE.
> - 75 min long line to just check in in O'Hare.
> - 1 hour long security check line in Warsaw. Rude and very invasive
> search, too.
> - Even though tickets were purchased 3 months in advance, seating
> assigned made sure members of our family seat as far from
> each other as possible (my mistake for not checking it before we
> came to the airport)
> - Weather-unrelated delays on both trans-Atlantic flights (1 and 2.5
> hours; "some kind of engine trouble" (!)).
> - The luggage was not transferred at all on trip forward and
> one suitcase was transferred to a wrong flight on trip back.
> - Without exception, stewardesses keep talking to every passenger
> in Polish - even after learning that the passenger does not speak
> Polish.
> - Food is given in liliputian amounts and has no taste.
> - The other flight services are unexistent. Pressing stewardess call
> button has no effect whatsoever.
> In brief, LOT Airlines seems to be run by a buch of incompetent
> morons. Stay away from it if you can.
> DK
*buying your tickets a week, a month, 6 months, a year or even 10 years in
advance dont make any difference about seating if its not prebooked. also
the reason you waited 75 mins to checkin was prob the fact you was near the
last to checkin and the queue just piled up and hence you got crappy seats
too
*Polish airline, polish crew........ being english or american, you cant
expect everyone to just speak english. If you like that then i'd guess
maybe next time travel with either an american or british carrier.
*you not notice not everyone has the same taste buds, think poor souls who
dont like strong taste what can they do about it, if it was suited to your
needs? put water in to dilute the taste? next time try looking for the salt
and pepper.
*if you complained about everything then i guess maybe they were avoiding
you.
--
Electrical Kettle instant hot water (home, office)
Platinums.co.uk - or remember this
Kettle.us.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
\\ l l l //
(@ @)
____________ oOO-(_)-OOo____________
"DK" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> LOT tickets for our recent Chicago-Vienna trip were hundred-and-some $$
> less than comparable United and Lufthansa. After some deliberations,
> we decided to give this post-Communist company a benefit of doubt.
> BIG MISTAKE.
> - 75 min long line to just check in in O'Hare.
> - 1 hour long security check line in Warsaw. Rude and very invasive
> search, too.
> - Even though tickets were purchased 3 months in advance, seating
> assigned made sure members of our family seat as far from
> each other as possible (my mistake for not checking it before we
> came to the airport)
> - Weather-unrelated delays on both trans-Atlantic flights (1 and 2.5
> hours; "some kind of engine trouble" (!)).
> - The luggage was not transferred at all on trip forward and
> one suitcase was transferred to a wrong flight on trip back.
> - Without exception, stewardesses keep talking to every passenger
> in Polish - even after learning that the passenger does not speak
> Polish.
> - Food is given in liliputian amounts and has no taste.
> - The other flight services are unexistent. Pressing stewardess call
> button has no effect whatsoever.
> In brief, LOT Airlines seems to be run by a buch of incompetent
> morons. Stay away from it if you can.
> DK
Aug 22nd 2005 | 4:36 pm
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
x-no-archive: yes
DK wrote:
> LOT tickets for our recent Chicago-Vienna trip were hundred-and-some $$
> less than comparable United and Lufthansa. After some deliberations,
> we decided to give this post-Communist company a benefit of doubt.
> BIG MISTAKE.
>
> - 75 min long line to just check in in O'Hare.
> - 1 hour long security check line in Warsaw. Rude and very invasive
> search, too.
What does it have to do with LOT itself?
DK wrote:
> LOT tickets for our recent Chicago-Vienna trip were hundred-and-some $$
> less than comparable United and Lufthansa. After some deliberations,
> we decided to give this post-Communist company a benefit of doubt.
> BIG MISTAKE.
>
> - 75 min long line to just check in in O'Hare.
> - 1 hour long security check line in Warsaw. Rude and very invasive
> search, too.
What does it have to do with LOT itself?
Aug 22nd 2005 | 4:48 pm
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
x-no-archive: yes
Casey wrote:
>>BIG MISTAKE.
>
>
> I traveled on Lufthansa and LOT in May, and my LOT flight
> was much more pleasant than my Lufthansa flight. I will still fly
> with both of them in the future, though.
>
I will _never_ fly with Luft Hans.
They are paranoic morons discriminating against clients of Polish origin.
I have seen them in action, and f.. them very much.
>
Casey wrote:
>>BIG MISTAKE.
>
>
> I traveled on Lufthansa and LOT in May, and my LOT flight
> was much more pleasant than my Lufthansa flight. I will still fly
> with both of them in the future, though.
>
I will _never_ fly with Luft Hans.
They are paranoic morons discriminating against clients of Polish origin.
I have seen them in action, and f.. them very much.
>
Aug 22nd 2005 | 4:49 pm
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
x-no-archive: yes
Miguel Cruz wrote:
> Casey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I traveled on Lufthansa and LOT in May, and my LOT flight
>>was much more pleasant than my Lufthansa flight.
>
>
> Feeding your own intestines into a wood chopper is more pleasant than a
> Lufthansa flight.
>
Exactly, paranoic Uebermenschen.
Miguel Cruz wrote:
> Casey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I traveled on Lufthansa and LOT in May, and my LOT flight
>>was much more pleasant than my Lufthansa flight.
>
>
> Feeding your own intestines into a wood chopper is more pleasant than a
> Lufthansa flight.
>
Exactly, paranoic Uebermenschen.
Aug 22nd 2005 | 5:10 pm
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
x-no-archive: yes
Jerzy Pawlowski wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Milton Noyes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Do you think you can get the same quality service on
>>American Airlines as the Gringo next to you, if you
>>don't speak any English, only Spanish? No way Jose!
>>There is always going to be a slight difference here.
>
>
> That is hard to understand for the "les anglo-saxon"
> "masters of the universe". They leave the US expecting
> that everyone will speak perfect English to them.
Yes, some such morons keep asking people
"where are you from?" as if they were still in the
US and the asked guy just arrived there yesterday.
They don't know they have crossed any border.
I believe they are perfectly capable of asking Polish people
in Poland "where are you from?"
But not all the Americans are such.
Such morons happen to live in every country.
They are just the most vociferous.
> Then they come back from France saying that the French
> were rude to them. Well guess what, the Earth doesn't
> rotate around them, not yet.
>
Jerzy Pawlowski wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Milton Noyes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Do you think you can get the same quality service on
>>American Airlines as the Gringo next to you, if you
>>don't speak any English, only Spanish? No way Jose!
>>There is always going to be a slight difference here.
>
>
> That is hard to understand for the "les anglo-saxon"
> "masters of the universe". They leave the US expecting
> that everyone will speak perfect English to them.
Yes, some such morons keep asking people
"where are you from?" as if they were still in the
US and the asked guy just arrived there yesterday.
They don't know they have crossed any border.
I believe they are perfectly capable of asking Polish people
in Poland "where are you from?"
But not all the Americans are such.
Such morons happen to live in every country.
They are just the most vociferous.
> Then they come back from France saying that the French
> were rude to them. Well guess what, the Earth doesn't
> rotate around them, not yet.
>
Aug 22nd 2005 | 6:28 pm
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
x-no-archive: yes
"Cidebur" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Cidebur wrote:
>>> DK wrote:
>>>> LOT tickets for our recent Chicago-Vienna trip
>>> LOT is not serving Chicago-Vienna.
>>> Poland has problem not only with
>>> PLL LOT, and everything is thanks to
>>> bandit Hitler, murderer Stalin and
>>> traitor Roosevelt.
>>> Just to remember...
>>> wk
>> Pilsudski is to blame
> He died in 1935.
> ?
> wk
Then Saint Mary
"Cidebur" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Cidebur wrote:
>>> DK wrote:
>>>> LOT tickets for our recent Chicago-Vienna trip
>>> LOT is not serving Chicago-Vienna.
>>> Poland has problem not only with
>>> PLL LOT, and everything is thanks to
>>> bandit Hitler, murderer Stalin and
>>> traitor Roosevelt.
>>> Just to remember...
>>> wk
>> Pilsudski is to blame
> He died in 1935.
> ?
> wk
Then Saint Mary
Aug 22nd 2005 | 6:55 pm
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
x-no-archive: yes
"Milton Noyes" <[email protected]> wrote :
> "gordon" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The Air Force was very upset when Pan Am stopped serving the Far
>> East.
>> As long as Pan Am served the Far East, the Air force only ran the
>> second worst airline in Asia.
>> Old joke but a lot of truth from one who flew both regularly from
>> Okinawa 76-79.
> :))
> That was then. Nowadays, I imagine, the Air Force could make
> quite a lot of money if they chose to sell tickets to some carefully
> pre-screened civilian travelers.
> I know I wouldn't mind flying next to a bunch of guys with M16's.
> Crappy service, tasteless food, noise, or foul language,
> notwithstanding.
The Warsaw Pact flight experiewnce, he?
> MN
"Milton Noyes" <[email protected]> wrote :
> "gordon" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The Air Force was very upset when Pan Am stopped serving the Far
>> East.
>> As long as Pan Am served the Far East, the Air force only ran the
>> second worst airline in Asia.
>> Old joke but a lot of truth from one who flew both regularly from
>> Okinawa 76-79.
> :))
> That was then. Nowadays, I imagine, the Air Force could make
> quite a lot of money if they chose to sell tickets to some carefully
> pre-screened civilian travelers.
> I know I wouldn't mind flying next to a bunch of guys with M16's.
> Crappy service, tasteless food, noise, or foul language,
> notwithstanding.
The Warsaw Pact flight experiewnce, he?
> MN
Aug 22nd 2005 | 8:31 pm
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
"Cidebur" <[email protected]> skrev i meddelandet
news:[email protected] k.net...
> Lennart Petersen wrote:
>> Anyway as most airlines in Star-Alliance are high quality airlines like
>> LH,SAS,Singapore and others the could be reason to question if LOT is
>> worth to be included in STAR assuming the report from DK is true. And
>> having some experience from Poland I've reason to believe that LOT may
>> have problems.
> I hope, You'll not decide about it.
> From www.staralliance.com if You want to read.
> wk
> LOT Polish Airlines, LOT Polish Airlines is a joint stock company
> established on December 29, 1992, as a result of transforming the state
> owned company of the same name. Until the end of the year 1999 one hundred
> per cent of shares in the Company's capital was owned by the State
> Treasury. As a result of the Company's privatisation in November 1999, the
> Swiss holding SAirGroup acquired part of LOT Polish Airlines shares.
So what are you talking about.
Obviously LOT is an independent airline fully responsible for its service.
STAR-alliance is a an alliance for cooperation not being a shareholder for
the participating airlines.
news:[email protected] k.net...
> Lennart Petersen wrote:
>> Anyway as most airlines in Star-Alliance are high quality airlines like
>> LH,SAS,Singapore and others the could be reason to question if LOT is
>> worth to be included in STAR assuming the report from DK is true. And
>> having some experience from Poland I've reason to believe that LOT may
>> have problems.
> I hope, You'll not decide about it.
> From www.staralliance.com if You want to read.
> wk
> LOT Polish Airlines, LOT Polish Airlines is a joint stock company
> established on December 29, 1992, as a result of transforming the state
> owned company of the same name. Until the end of the year 1999 one hundred
> per cent of shares in the Company's capital was owned by the State
> Treasury. As a result of the Company's privatisation in November 1999, the
> Swiss holding SAirGroup acquired part of LOT Polish Airlines shares.
So what are you talking about.
Obviously LOT is an independent airline fully responsible for its service.
STAR-alliance is a an alliance for cooperation not being a shareholder for
the participating airlines.
Aug 22nd 2005 | 9:02 pm
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:44:01 GMT, [email protected] (DK)
wrote:
>- 75 min long line to just check in in O'Hare.
that's the same it took in las vegas mccarran 6 days ago, when we were
checking in with american west airlines. 75+ minutes.
please, add the fact that we weren't allowed to lock our luggage
--funny and pleasant thing--.
and, once more, it took *90* minutes to check in in san francisco when
leaving to london, with british airways.
only 20 minutes for *fast bag drop* in london to italy --no real
check-in: only baggage drop--.
regards,
--
Gianni Rondinini (30, tanti, RA)
VBR - Vero Birro Romagnolo
Hai capito, scelf?
wrote:
>- 75 min long line to just check in in O'Hare.
that's the same it took in las vegas mccarran 6 days ago, when we were
checking in with american west airlines. 75+ minutes.
please, add the fact that we weren't allowed to lock our luggage
--funny and pleasant thing--.
and, once more, it took *90* minutes to check in in san francisco when
leaving to london, with british airways.
only 20 minutes for *fast bag drop* in london to italy --no real
check-in: only baggage drop--.
regards,
--
Gianni Rondinini (30, tanti, RA)
VBR - Vero Birro Romagnolo
Hai capito, scelf?
Aug 22nd 2005 | 9:07 pm
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
"Lennart Petersen" <[email protected]> writes:
> "Cidebur" <[email protected]> skrev i meddelandet
> news:[email protected] k.net...
> > Lennart Petersen wrote:
> >> Anyway as most airlines in Star-Alliance are high quality airlines like
> >> LH,SAS,Singapore and others the could be reason to question if LOT is
> >> worth to be included in STAR assuming the report from DK is true. And
> >> having some experience from Poland I've reason to believe that LOT may
> >> have problems.
> >
> > I hope, You'll not decide about it.
> > From www.staralliance.com if You want to read.
> > wk
> >
> > LOT Polish Airlines, LOT Polish Airlines is a joint stock company
> > established on December 29, 1992, as a result of transforming the state
> > owned company of the same name. Until the end of the year 1999 one hundred
> > per cent of shares in the Company's capital was owned by the State
> > Treasury. As a result of the Company's privatisation in November 1999, the
> > Swiss holding SAirGroup acquired part of LOT Polish Airlines shares.
> So what are you talking about.
> Obviously LOT is an independent airline fully responsible for its service.
> STAR-alliance is a an alliance for cooperation not being a shareholder for
> the participating airlines.
Is STAR-alliance capable to kick off misbehaving members?
STAR-aliace is *somehow* responsible for every of its members. They are
*AT LEAST* responsible for removing substandard airlines from the
aliance.
--
Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip [email protected] [email protected]
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
-- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
> "Cidebur" <[email protected]> skrev i meddelandet
> news:[email protected] k.net...
> > Lennart Petersen wrote:
> >> Anyway as most airlines in Star-Alliance are high quality airlines like
> >> LH,SAS,Singapore and others the could be reason to question if LOT is
> >> worth to be included in STAR assuming the report from DK is true. And
> >> having some experience from Poland I've reason to believe that LOT may
> >> have problems.
> >
> > I hope, You'll not decide about it.
> > From www.staralliance.com if You want to read.
> > wk
> >
> > LOT Polish Airlines, LOT Polish Airlines is a joint stock company
> > established on December 29, 1992, as a result of transforming the state
> > owned company of the same name. Until the end of the year 1999 one hundred
> > per cent of shares in the Company's capital was owned by the State
> > Treasury. As a result of the Company's privatisation in November 1999, the
> > Swiss holding SAirGroup acquired part of LOT Polish Airlines shares.
> So what are you talking about.
> Obviously LOT is an independent airline fully responsible for its service.
> STAR-alliance is a an alliance for cooperation not being a shareholder for
> the participating airlines.
Is STAR-alliance capable to kick off misbehaving members?
STAR-aliace is *somehow* responsible for every of its members. They are
*AT LEAST* responsible for removing substandard airlines from the
aliance.
--
Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip [email protected] [email protected]
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
-- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Aug 22nd 2005 | 9:11 pm
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
USA airports must be among the worst airports around [Was: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around]
Gianni Rondinini <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:44:01 GMT, [email protected] (DK)
> wrote:
>
> >- 75 min long line to just check in in O'Hare.
>
> that's the same it took in las vegas mccarran 6 days ago, when we were
> checking in with american west airlines. 75+ minutes.
> please, add the fact that we weren't allowed to lock our luggage
> --funny and pleasant thing--.
> and, once more, it took *90* minutes to check in in san francisco when
> leaving to london, with british airways.
> only 20 minutes for *fast bag drop* in london to italy --no real
> check-in: only baggage drop--.
So long checks in are not "LOT specific" in USA airports?
--
Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip [email protected] [email protected]
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
-- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:44:01 GMT, [email protected] (DK)
> wrote:
>
> >- 75 min long line to just check in in O'Hare.
>
> that's the same it took in las vegas mccarran 6 days ago, when we were
> checking in with american west airlines. 75+ minutes.
> please, add the fact that we weren't allowed to lock our luggage
> --funny and pleasant thing--.
> and, once more, it took *90* minutes to check in in san francisco when
> leaving to london, with british airways.
> only 20 minutes for *fast bag drop* in london to italy --no real
> check-in: only baggage drop--.
So long checks in are not "LOT specific" in USA airports?
--
Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip [email protected] [email protected]
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
-- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Aug 22nd 2005 | 10:58 pm
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LOT Airlines must be one of the worst airlines around
Uzytkownik "Kaczor Donald" <[email protected]> napisal w wiadomosci
news:AUxOe.9115$137.1374@trnddc08...
x-no-archive: yes
> I will _never_ fly with Luft Hans.
> They are paranoic morons discriminating against clients of Polish origin.
> I have seen them in action, and f.. them very much.
I am a Pole and was flying with Lufthansa few times. Always the women on
board in Lufthansa were much nicer to me than in LOT Polish airlines.
FINNAIR, Aerlingus, Ryanair and JAL also were OK to me. The nicest ladies
were in KLM. I love flying the Dutch KLM. They just love their passengers.
The only more rude than some of those hags from LOT were witches in British
Airways planes.
That is my personal opinion obviously.
news:AUxOe.9115$137.1374@trnddc08...
x-no-archive: yes
> I will _never_ fly with Luft Hans.
> They are paranoic morons discriminating against clients of Polish origin.
> I have seen them in action, and f.. them very much.
I am a Pole and was flying with Lufthansa few times. Always the women on
board in Lufthansa were much nicer to me than in LOT Polish airlines.
FINNAIR, Aerlingus, Ryanair and JAL also were OK to me. The nicest ladies
were in KLM. I love flying the Dutch KLM. They just love their passengers.
The only more rude than some of those hags from LOT were witches in British
Airways planes.
That is my personal opinion obviously.
