The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Mar 14th 2004 | 7:05 am
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Lina Morgan <[email protected]> honored us in alt.atheism with
the following discourse:
> stoney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:58:34 +0000, Lina Morgan
>><[email protected]>, Message ID:
>><[email protected] > wrote in alt.atheism;
>>>[email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>>Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>>>(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings, let
>>>>alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
>>>>more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a
reason,
>>>>it has to do with birth)
>>>Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
>>>pleasure. These people have been watching too much pornography. Go
to
>>>confession!
>>Make sure to make it to the holy water to gargle before the other
ladies
>>do after you ingest the priest's holy spurt. What's that? He wants
>>your little boy? That's good, says 'Jesus.'
> I'm laughing at all the eternity you will spend in hell.
And we'd laugh at your current mental hell-o-earth if we didn't feel
sorry for you.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political institution for the control of
people's thoughts, lives, and actions; based on
ancient myths and superstitions perpetrated through
generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
the following discourse:
> stoney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:58:34 +0000, Lina Morgan
>><[email protected]>, Message ID:
>><[email protected] > wrote in alt.atheism;
>>>[email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>>Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>>>(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings, let
>>>>alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
>>>>more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a
reason,
>>>>it has to do with birth)
>>>Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
>>>pleasure. These people have been watching too much pornography. Go
to
>>>confession!
>>Make sure to make it to the holy water to gargle before the other
ladies
>>do after you ingest the priest's holy spurt. What's that? He wants
>>your little boy? That's good, says 'Jesus.'
> I'm laughing at all the eternity you will spend in hell.
And we'd laugh at your current mental hell-o-earth if we didn't feel
sorry for you.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political institution for the control of
people's thoughts, lives, and actions; based on
ancient myths and superstitions perpetrated through
generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
Mar 14th 2004 | 8:57 am
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
In rec.travel.europe Lina Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
Would you be interested in this bridge I have for sale?
> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
Would you be interested in this bridge I have for sale?
Mar 14th 2004 | 8:59 am
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
In rec.travel.europe Lina Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
> No need for that, my priest and my entire congregation love me and respect
> me and hold me in the highest regard. I am a very loving person, of that
> there is no doubt. And I love God above all else, as is commanded.
You have to be commanded to love? How odd.
> No need for that, my priest and my entire congregation love me and respect
> me and hold me in the highest regard. I am a very loving person, of that
> there is no doubt. And I love God above all else, as is commanded.
You have to be commanded to love? How odd.
Mar 14th 2004 | 10:23 am
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Lina Morgan wrote:
> Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Lina Morgan wrote:
>>> [email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>> Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right?
>>>> LOL!
>>>> (Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve
>>>> endings, let alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus
>>>> has 100,000,000,000 more nerves in it that the vagina. The
>>>> vagina is "numb" for a reason, it has to do with birth)
>>> Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be
>>> abused for pleasure.
>> What's wrong with pleasure?
> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the
> next life.
This life *is* your life. Enjoy it while you can.
> Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Lina Morgan wrote:
>>> [email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>> Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right?
>>>> LOL!
>>>> (Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve
>>>> endings, let alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus
>>>> has 100,000,000,000 more nerves in it that the vagina. The
>>>> vagina is "numb" for a reason, it has to do with birth)
>>> Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be
>>> abused for pleasure.
>> What's wrong with pleasure?
> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the
> next life.
This life *is* your life. Enjoy it while you can.
Mar 14th 2004 | 1:43 pm
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:58 +0000, Lina Morgan wrote:
> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
Welcome to the eighteenth century.
Even that old fart in Rome who refuses to die would disgree with you on
that one.
> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
Welcome to the eighteenth century.
Even that old fart in Rome who refuses to die would disgree with you on
that one.
Mar 14th 2004 | 11:17 pm
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Lina Morgan wrote:
> Sex is for procreation. God commanded it that way,
> and nothing you have to say will change that.
Not a bad bit of trolling. You're doing a good job of making
Christians look like idiots (not that some of them need much help
in that department).
> Sex is for procreation. God commanded it that way,
> and nothing you have to say will change that.
Not a bad bit of trolling. You're doing a good job of making
Christians look like idiots (not that some of them need much help
in that department).
Mar 14th 2004 | 11:21 pm
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Lina Morgan wrote:
>> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
>> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
>> with the problem.
> You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
> glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
> wrong with it.
Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
>> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
>> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
>> with the problem.
> You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
> glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
> wrong with it.
Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
Mar 15th 2004 | 12:59 am
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
In article <[email protected]>, Icarus says...
>Lina Morgan wrote:
>>> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
>>> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
>>> with the problem.
>> You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
>> glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
>> wrong with it.
>Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
Sounds like The Great Rite to me
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
>Lina Morgan wrote:
>>> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
>>> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
>>> with the problem.
>> You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
>> glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
>> wrong with it.
>Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
Sounds like The Great Rite to me
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
Mar 15th 2004 | 6:00 am
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:58:34 +0000, Lina Morgan
<[email protected]> ejaculated:
>[email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings, let
>>alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
>>more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a reason,
>>it has to do with birth)
>Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
>pleasure. These people have been watching too much pornography. Go to
>confession!
Does this injunction apply just to the laity or to the ass-****ing
pedophile priests, too?
--
What do you get when you multiply 6 by 9?
<[email protected]> ejaculated:
>[email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings, let
>>alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
>>more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a reason,
>>it has to do with birth)
>Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
>pleasure. These people have been watching too much pornography. Go to
>confession!
Does this injunction apply just to the laity or to the ass-****ing
pedophile priests, too?
--
What do you get when you multiply 6 by 9?
Mar 15th 2004 | 6:19 am
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:21:30 -0000, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "Icarus"
<[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
... Lina Morgan wrote:
...
... >> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
... >> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
... >> with the problem.
... >
... > You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
... > glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
... > wrong with it.
...
... Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
Missionary position, no lights whatsoever - only ! LOL
<[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
... Lina Morgan wrote:
...
... >> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
... >> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
... >> with the problem.
... >
... > You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
... > glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
... > wrong with it.
...
... Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
Missionary position, no lights whatsoever - only ! LOL
Mar 15th 2004 | 6:21 am
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:21:05 +0000, in alt.gossip.celebrities, Lina Morgan
<[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
... You should be in jail for exposing your children to stuff like that.
And YOU should be in jail for being naked under your clothes.
<[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
... You should be in jail for exposing your children to stuff like that.
And YOU should be in jail for being naked under your clothes.
Mar 15th 2004 | 11:28 am
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Good and Evil - Volume 1
...is not your own namesake, Satan, a much more decrepit stench-monger
than anything the poor old Pontiff could possibly exude???
Shall we even mention that the Pontiff has a name and reputation to
question while his naysayer provides none... But of course the devil is
a coward who hides in darkness; his 'work' done by innuendo and lies...
(...and ignorant cross-posting trolls...)
Tim K
"devil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news
[email protected]...
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:58 +0000, Lina Morgan wrote:
> > We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next
life.
> Welcome to the eighteenth century.
> Even that old fart in Rome who refuses to die would disgree with you
on
> that one.
than anything the poor old Pontiff could possibly exude???
Shall we even mention that the Pontiff has a name and reputation to
question while his naysayer provides none... But of course the devil is
a coward who hides in darkness; his 'work' done by innuendo and lies...
(...and ignorant cross-posting trolls...)
Tim K
"devil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news
[email protected]...> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:58 +0000, Lina Morgan wrote:
> > We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next
life.
> Welcome to the eighteenth century.
> Even that old fart in Rome who refuses to die would disgree with you
on
> that one.
Mar 15th 2004 | 12:15 pm
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Good and Evil - Volume 1
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:28:02 +0000, Tim Kroesen wrote:
> ...is not your own namesake, Satan, a much more decrepit stench-monger
> than anything the poor old Pontiff could possibly exude???
>
> Shall we even mention that the Pontiff has a name and reputation to
> question while his naysayer provides none... But of course the devil is
> a coward who hides in darkness; his 'work' done by innuendo and lies...
>
> (...and ignorant cross-posting trolls...)
Eh, I don't hide.
And no, no innuendos. I clearly state what I think.
The best thing the old fart could do *for the sake of the very business
that he is the CEO of* would be to resign. Or if he likes it better, to
drop dead.
Current interreign does them no good.
> ...is not your own namesake, Satan, a much more decrepit stench-monger
> than anything the poor old Pontiff could possibly exude???
>
> Shall we even mention that the Pontiff has a name and reputation to
> question while his naysayer provides none... But of course the devil is
> a coward who hides in darkness; his 'work' done by innuendo and lies...
>
> (...and ignorant cross-posting trolls...)
Eh, I don't hide.
And no, no innuendos. I clearly state what I think.
The best thing the old fart could do *for the sake of the very business
that he is the CEO of* would be to resign. Or if he likes it better, to
drop dead.
Current interreign does them no good.
Mar 15th 2004 | 12:48 pm
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Good and Evil - Volume 2
Will you please attribute the sig quote; I don't believe you're
cognizant enough to have said that yourself; therefore no sense in
arguing the point with you.
BTW; it's pretty clear from the recently provided Catholic abuse stats
the real problem of sexual abuse in the church 'stemmed' from priests
with homosexual tendencies that were unable to control their homosexual
pedophilic urges with their young charges; *80%* of all reported abuse
being (male on male) *homosexual pedophilia* in nature...
I await the usual conniptions of our local homosexual politicians and
spin doctors on this mater... <g> Amazing how all the recent reports
fell on deaf homosexual ears here...
*80%* (of all reported abuses) Homosexual and pedophiliac in the
Catholic Church, gents... Apparently our poor sexually deprived
heterosexual priests are much more able to cope with their natural
sexual desires than those with abnormal homosexual desires; particularly
regarding the victimization of children... Four times more able to cope
with a celibate life. What's so 'gay' about being "Gay", anyway...? Is
the lack of 'self-control' also an aspect of this genetic/psychological
aberration we call homosexuality?
Perhaps our children *would truly be* safer from sexual abuse by Priests
if we as Catholics excluded homosexuals as Priests? Clear statistics
from past abuses (last 40 Years or so) support this exclusion; 4 out of
5 children may NOT have been abused; Hundreds (Thousands???) of
Children might have been spared their ordeal; foisted on them by those
with homosexual desires that even outweighed the precepts of their
chosen religion, let alone any sense of civil law... How "Gay" of them.
The truth emerging here is 'the Catholic Church' as an organization
*mainly* fell down in protecting it's children from sexual abuse by
allowing a homosexual sub-culture to exist within its ranks of Priests.
No; lets not cover it up any more; lets make no further excuses. They
are a sick cross section of society (as evidenced by the pedophilia at
least!) who should be expunged from any position of pastoral authority
and civilly prosecuted. No 'excuses' whatsoever any more; this problem
is outed!
Tim K
"Woden" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Lina Morgan <[email protected]> honored us in alt.atheism
with
> the following discourse:
> > stoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:58:34 +0000, Lina Morgan
> >><[email protected]>, Message ID:
> >><[email protected] > wrote in
alt.atheism;
> >>
> >>>[email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
> >>>>
> >>>>(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings,
let
> >>>>alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
> >>>>more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a
> reason,
> >>>>it has to do with birth)
> >>>
> >>>Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
> >>>pleasure. These people have been watching too much pornography.
Go
> to
> >>>confession!
> >>
> >>Make sure to make it to the holy water to gargle before the other
> ladies
> >>do after you ingest the priest's holy spurt. What's that? He wants
> >>your little boy? That's good, says 'Jesus.'
> > I'm laughing at all the eternity you will spend in hell.
> And we'd laugh at your current mental hell-o-earth if we didn't feel
> sorry for you.
> --
> Woden
> "religion is a socio-political institution for the control of
> people's thoughts, lives, and actions; based on
> ancient myths and superstitions perpetrated through
> generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
cognizant enough to have said that yourself; therefore no sense in
arguing the point with you.
BTW; it's pretty clear from the recently provided Catholic abuse stats
the real problem of sexual abuse in the church 'stemmed' from priests
with homosexual tendencies that were unable to control their homosexual
pedophilic urges with their young charges; *80%* of all reported abuse
being (male on male) *homosexual pedophilia* in nature...
I await the usual conniptions of our local homosexual politicians and
spin doctors on this mater... <g> Amazing how all the recent reports
fell on deaf homosexual ears here...
*80%* (of all reported abuses) Homosexual and pedophiliac in the
Catholic Church, gents... Apparently our poor sexually deprived
heterosexual priests are much more able to cope with their natural
sexual desires than those with abnormal homosexual desires; particularly
regarding the victimization of children... Four times more able to cope
with a celibate life. What's so 'gay' about being "Gay", anyway...? Is
the lack of 'self-control' also an aspect of this genetic/psychological
aberration we call homosexuality?
Perhaps our children *would truly be* safer from sexual abuse by Priests
if we as Catholics excluded homosexuals as Priests? Clear statistics
from past abuses (last 40 Years or so) support this exclusion; 4 out of
5 children may NOT have been abused; Hundreds (Thousands???) of
Children might have been spared their ordeal; foisted on them by those
with homosexual desires that even outweighed the precepts of their
chosen religion, let alone any sense of civil law... How "Gay" of them.
The truth emerging here is 'the Catholic Church' as an organization
*mainly* fell down in protecting it's children from sexual abuse by
allowing a homosexual sub-culture to exist within its ranks of Priests.
No; lets not cover it up any more; lets make no further excuses. They
are a sick cross section of society (as evidenced by the pedophilia at
least!) who should be expunged from any position of pastoral authority
and civilly prosecuted. No 'excuses' whatsoever any more; this problem
is outed!
Tim K
"Woden" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Lina Morgan <[email protected]> honored us in alt.atheism
with
> the following discourse:
> > stoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:58:34 +0000, Lina Morgan
> >><[email protected]>, Message ID:
> >><[email protected] > wrote in
alt.atheism;
> >>
> >>>[email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
> >>>>
> >>>>(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings,
let
> >>>>alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
> >>>>more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a
> reason,
> >>>>it has to do with birth)
> >>>
> >>>Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
> >>>pleasure. These people have been watching too much pornography.
Go
> to
> >>>confession!
> >>
> >>Make sure to make it to the holy water to gargle before the other
> ladies
> >>do after you ingest the priest's holy spurt. What's that? He wants
> >>your little boy? That's good, says 'Jesus.'
> > I'm laughing at all the eternity you will spend in hell.
> And we'd laugh at your current mental hell-o-earth if we didn't feel
> sorry for you.
> --
> Woden
> "religion is a socio-political institution for the control of
> people's thoughts, lives, and actions; based on
> ancient myths and superstitions perpetrated through
> generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
Mar 15th 2004 | 1:23 pm
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Good and Evil - Volume 1
The Pontiff leads those who have faith; Satan those who only believe in
themselves...<g>
Thus it has been since we removed ourselves from the Garden He provided
to follow our own whims
What was your name and home addy BTW...<G> I know where to go If I have
a problem with the Pontiff; he's a stand up guy!
Tim K
"devil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:28:02 +0000, Tim Kroesen wrote:
> > ...is not your own namesake, Satan, a much more decrepit
stench-monger
> > than anything the poor old Pontiff could possibly exude???
> >
> > Shall we even mention that the Pontiff has a name and reputation to
> > question while his naysayer provides none... But of course the
devil is
> > a coward who hides in darkness; his 'work' done by innuendo and
lies...
> >
> > (...and ignorant cross-posting trolls...)
> Eh, I don't hide.
> And no, no innuendos. I clearly state what I think.
> The best thing the old fart could do *for the sake of the very
business
> that he is the CEO of* would be to resign. Or if he likes it better,
to
> drop dead.
> Current interreign does them no good.
themselves...<g>
Thus it has been since we removed ourselves from the Garden He provided
to follow our own whims
What was your name and home addy BTW...<G> I know where to go If I have
a problem with the Pontiff; he's a stand up guy!
Tim K
"devil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news
[email protected]...> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:28:02 +0000, Tim Kroesen wrote:
> > ...is not your own namesake, Satan, a much more decrepit
stench-monger
> > than anything the poor old Pontiff could possibly exude???
> >
> > Shall we even mention that the Pontiff has a name and reputation to
> > question while his naysayer provides none... But of course the
devil is
> > a coward who hides in darkness; his 'work' done by innuendo and
lies...
> >
> > (...and ignorant cross-posting trolls...)
> Eh, I don't hide.
> And no, no innuendos. I clearly state what I think.
> The best thing the old fart could do *for the sake of the very
business
> that he is the CEO of* would be to resign. Or if he likes it better,
to
> drop dead.
> Current interreign does them no good.
