On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:23:35 +0000, Tim Kroesen wrote:

    > The Pontiff leads those who have faith; Satan those who only believe in
    > themselves...<g>

Faith? AKA wishful thinking.

Believe in themselves? Recognize that they are alone in an empty
universe. That have the courage and moral strength to recognize that
death is inexistence.

    > Thus it has been since we removed ourselves from the Garden He provided
    > to follow our own whims
    >
    > What was your name and home addy BTW...<G> I know where to go If I have
    > a problem with the Pontiff; he's a stand up guy!

My e-mail is legitimate. Has been for quite a while. Only reason not you
my own name is to make sure my employer/business associates and contacts
don't stand in the way of my freedom of speech.

This planet is a small town.

...and the devil we know here is just as miniscule as the boundaries of
his existence...

You're just being a plastic dash-board kinda Satan, devil...<G>


Tim K

"devil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
    > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:23:35 +0000, Tim Kroesen wrote:
    > > The Pontiff leads those who have faith; Satan those who only believe
in
    > > themselves...<g>
    > Faith? AKA wishful thinking.
    > Believe in themselves? Recognize that they are alone in an empty
    > universe. That have the courage and moral strength to recognize that
    > death is inexistence.
    > > Thus it has been since we removed ourselves from the Garden He
provided
    > > to follow our own whims
    > >
    > > What was your name and home addy BTW...<G> I know where to go If I
have
    > > a problem with the Pontiff; he's a stand up guy!
    > My e-mail is legitimate. Has been for quite a while. Only reason not
you
    > my own name is to make sure my employer/business associates and
contacts
    > don't stand in the way of my freedom of speech.
    > This planet is a small town.

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:59:14 +0000 in episode
<[email protected]> we saw our hero Robibnikoff
<[email protected]>:

    > In article <[email protected]>, Icarus says...
    >>Lina Morgan wrote:
    >>>> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
    >>>> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
    >>>> with the problem.
    >>> You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
    >>> glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
    >>> wrong with it.
    >>Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
    >
    > Sounds like The Great Rite to me

"Gimme that ol' time religion..."

--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:21:03 +0100, Magda <[email protected]>,
Message ID: <[email protected]> wrote in
alt.atheism;

    >On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:21:05 +0000, in alt.gossip.celebrities, Lina Morgan
    ><[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
    > ... You should be in jail for exposing your children to stuff like that.
    >And YOU should be in jail for being naked under your clothes.

    

People run away vomiting as it is.....



Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"

When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert

alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:37:38 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil <[email protected]>
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :


... My e-mail is legitimate. Has been for quite a while. Only reason not you
... my own name is to make sure my employer/business associates and contacts
... don't stand in the way of my freedom of speech.
...
... This planet is a small town.

He would probably be happy to have a first name.
Are your initials D.E.V.I.L. ?

(My first name is legitimate. My email is as false as a three-Euro coin. ;-))

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:54:56 +0100, Magda wrote:

    > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:37:38 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil <[email protected]>
    > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
    >
    >
    > ... My e-mail is legitimate. Has been for quite a while. Only reason not you
    > ... my own name is to make sure my employer/business associates and contacts
    > ... don't stand in the way of my freedom of speech.
    > ...
    > ... This planet is a small town.
    >
    > He would probably be happy to have a first name.
    > Are your initials D.E.V.I.L. ?

No.

It's just that I like it. :-)

But I have used that same e-mail address since I stopped using my full
name, back in 2000. There were still a number of regulars in these
travel newsgroups who knew who I am. Although I suspect they have all
dropped out by now.

    > (My first name is legitimate. My email is as false as a three-Euro coin. ;-))

OK, I know your e-mail too, even your full name.

Still, I would argue that having a legitimate e-mail *and* a consistent ID
is not being anonymous. And anyway, what stands in the way of inventing
what would sound like a perfectly legitimate name, but entirely false?

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:07:41 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil <[email protected]>
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :

...
... But I have used that same e-mail address since I stopped using my full
... name, back in 2000. There were still a number of regulars in these
... travel newsgroups who knew who I am. Although I suspect they have all
... dropped out by now.

Or forgotten you. Four years is an eternity !

devil <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected] >...
[snip]
    > The best thing the old fart could do *for the sake of the very business
    > that he is the CEO of* would be to resign. Or if he likes it better, to
    > drop dead.
[snip]

You do realize the sort of ethical dilemma he is in. His assertion
and supposed belief is that of course he was chosen for the job by
his boss. His boss is not the kinda person that he believes should
be heavily questioned on such matters. Furthermore, he believes
his boss is more than capable of "firing" him at any moment
his boss so chooses. To quit would be to suggest to his boss that
the boss is wrong. A suggestion that could have LONG consequences
per his beliefs.

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:35:34 +0100, Magda wrote:

    > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:07:41 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil <[email protected]>
    > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
    >
    > ...
    > ... But I have used that same e-mail address since I stopped using my full
    > ... name, back in 2000. There were still a number of regulars in these
    > ... travel newsgroups who knew who I am. Although I suspect they have all
    > ... dropped out by now.
    >
    > Or forgotten you. Four years is an eternity !

Well, I have not quite forgotten them. Actually, I believe one of them is
still around.

In article <[email protected]>,
devil <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:35:34 +0100, Magda wrote:
    >
    > > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:07:41 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil
    > > <[email protected]>
    > > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
    > >
    > > ...
    > > ... But I have used that same e-mail address since I stopped using my full
    > > ... name, back in 2000. There were still a number of regulars in these
    > > ... travel newsgroups who knew who I am. Although I suspect they have all
    > > ... dropped out by now.
    > >
    > > Or forgotten you. Four years is an eternity !
    >
    > Well, I have not quite forgotten them. Actually, I believe one of them is
    > still around.

I remember devil manifesting himself in his current form. just can't
remember the previous manifestation.

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:28:23 +0000, Not the Karl Orff wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > devil <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:35:34 +0100, Magda wrote:
    >>
    >> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:07:41 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, devil
    >> > <[email protected]>
    >> > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
    >> >
    >> > ...
    >> > ... But I have used that same e-mail address since I stopped using my full
    >> > ... name, back in 2000. There were still a number of regulars in these
    >> > ... travel newsgroups who knew who I am. Although I suspect they have all
    >> > ... dropped out by now.
    >> >
    >> > Or forgotten you. Four years is an eternity !
    >>
    >> Well, I have not quite forgotten them. Actually, I believe one of them is
    >> still around.
    >
    > I remember devil manifesting himself in his current form. just can't
    > remember the previous manifestation.

I didn't advertise. When did you come about in your current form? Were
you around in a previous form, using your first name, starting with a t
perhaps? But with the end shortened, removing a vowel and changing the
consonant, in a way that pronouces the same?

In article <[email protected]>,
devil <[email protected]> wrote:

    > I didn't advertise.

I know. You just switched. Looking at the google archives, may I guess
oyu are a certain LB who had an address at a certain midwestern u.S.
acdemic establishment?

    > When did you come about in your current form? Were

Don't have a clue. 3-4 years?

    > you around in a previous form, using your first name, starting with a t
    > perhaps? But with the end shortened, removing a vowel and changing the
    > consonant, in a way that pronouces the same?

yes and no

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:50:14 +0000, Not the Karl Orff wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > devil <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> I didn't advertise.
    >
    > I know. You just switched. Looking at the google archives, may I guess
    > oyu are a certain LB who had an address at a certain midwestern u.S.
    > acdemic establishment?
    >
    >> When did you come about in your current form? Were
    >
    > Don't have a clue. 3-4 years?
    >
    >> you around in a previous form, using your first name, starting with a t
    >> perhaps? But with the end shortened, removing a vowel and changing the
    >> consonant, in a way that pronouces the same?
    >
    > yes and no

I would rather take this to e-mail I guess.

On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:11:36 -0500, "Carla R." <[email protected]>
wrote:

    >Great article, thanks so much for posting it! I hope all the men read it.
    >Men know so little about female sexuality. Most don't even know the
    >difference between a clitoral orgasm and a vaginal one.

Since it is a big male ego thing for us to brag to our buddies how well we are
able to satisfy women (even if we can't), perhaps it should devolve to the
ladies to help us learn to turn all that bullshit into horsepower. Of course,
that takes a willing student, and if the man in your life isn't willing to
learn, get rid of him.


    >"Leila DuBois" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> In the History of Gynecology, a Surprising Chapter
    >> By NATALIE ANGIER

[===]

On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:15:37 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
wrote:

    >Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>Lina Morgan wrote:
    >>> Ronald <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>> My wife has anal orgasms, so make that three kinds of female
    >>>> orgasm. Oh, and she can come just with nipple stimulation,
    >>>> so I guess it's actually four types of female orgasm.
    >>>> As an added bonus, she ejaculates sometimes when she has a
    >>>> real intense orgasm. Some kind of liquid sprays straight out
    >>>> of her ****.
    >>> I hate to shatter your illusions but if your wife is actually
    >>> having these kinds of emissions I'd have her checked out. She
    >>> probably installed some kind of plumbing system to fool you.
    >>No I'm afraid you're displaying your ignorance here. If you want to
    >>learn, read up about female ejaculations.
    >>> Oh, and no gentleman would ever post such things about his
    >>> wife. Shame on you.
    >>Of course he would. Sex is not something to be ashamed of, but
    >>something to be celebrated, and certainly a valid topic for
    >>discussion.
    >Wrong. Sex is for procreation. God commanded it that way, and nothing you
    >have to say will change that.

Your dickless god can go **** itself.