On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:32:52 -0500, in rec.travel.europe, "Trogdor" <[email protected]>
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:


... >>tomorrow is promised to no one
... >
... > By that logic children should be allowed to be molested, as they'll
... > eventually get ****ed one day anyway.
... > --
... > ---
... > DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
... > ---
... > --
... and by your logic...oh ..wait... you don't seem to have any logic...

You can't understand any kind of logic. Stop trying.

On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:51:12 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:

>
>>Can you find a credible figure where second hand tobacco smoke was
>>listed as the cause of death on a death certificate? BTW, you won't,
>>as it doesn't.
>
>Oddly, neither does first hand tobacco smoke.
>
>You is a simple fella, ain't ya!
>--

It sure is on the lates of death certificates. Tobacco is listed as
implicated or not. Before you write you should check your facts.
CigarBaron

"Magda" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:32:52 -0500, in rec.travel.europe, "Trogdor"
> <[email protected]>
> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
>
> ... >>tomorrow is promised to no one
> ... >
> ... > By that logic children should be allowed to be molested, as they'll
> ... > eventually get ****ed one day anyway.
> ... > --
> ... > ---
> ... > DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
> ... > ---
> ... > --
> ... and by your logic...oh ..wait... you don't seem to have any logic...
>
> You can't understand any kind of logic. Stop trying.
not your twisted- leap of ill- logic

Actually it was aliens

Magda wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:02:31 -0600, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "btorvik2"
> <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... Magda wrote:
> ... > On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:36:48 -0600, in alt.gossip.celebrities,
> ... > "btorvik2" <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked
> ... > like this:
> ... >
> ... > ...
> ... > ... Religion doesn't kill. People kill in the name of religion.
> ... > ...
> ... > ... And there's no scientific evidence that secondary smoke kills
> ... > anyone.
> ... >
> ... > No... only corpses.
> ...
> ... With no proof that any of them ever died from secondary smoke.
>
> No... it was fresh air that killed them.
>

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:56:09 -0500, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "Trogdor" <[email protected]>
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... > ... >>tomorrow is promised to no one
... > ... >
... > ... > By that logic children should be allowed to be molested, as they'll
... > ... > eventually get ****ed one day anyway.
... > ... > --
... > ... > ---
... > ... > DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
... > ... > ---
... > ... > --
... > ... and by your logic...oh ..wait... you don't seem to have any logic...
... >
... > You can't understand any kind of logic. Stop trying.

... not your twisted- leap of ill- logic

Great, you agree with me. Go back to sleep now.

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 08:08:42 -0700, in rec.travel.europe, Jim <[email protected]>
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Actually it was aliens

Aliens carrying fresh air guns.

Magda wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:02:31 -0600, in alt.gossip.celebrities,
> "btorvik2" <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked
> like this:
>
> ... Magda wrote:
> ... > On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:36:48 -0600, in alt.gossip.celebrities,
> ... > "btorvik2" <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they
> looked ... > like this:
> ... >
> ... > ...
> ... > ... Religion doesn't kill. People kill in the name of religion.
> ... > ...
> ... > ... And there's no scientific evidence that secondary smoke
> kills ... > anyone.
> ... >
> ... > No... only corpses.
> ...
> ... With no proof that any of them ever died from secondary smoke.
>
> No... it was fresh air that killed them.

Or heart attacks, or getting hit by a bus, or overeating, or falling off a
building, or.........

bernie


--
"Official ASC Shaman"

Magda wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:05:17 -0600, in alt.gossip.celebrities,
> "btorvik2" <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked
> like this:
>
> ... Magda wrote:
> ... > On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:46:54 -0600, in rec.travel.europe, "KLC
> Lewis" ... > <[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they
> looked like ... > this:
> ... >
> ... >
> ... > ... > ... Okay, let's keep it on topic: Most smokers, by a clear
> ... > majority, do ... > not die
> ... > ... > ... from smoking-related illness. Them's the facts, babe.
> Look ... > it up. ... >
> ... > ... > You'll love it when you are one of the "few" who die from
> some ... > ... > smoking-related illness.
> ... > ... > I've heard that the pain is just *adorable*!
> ... > ...
> ... > ... People die in horrible painful ways every minute of every
> day. I ... > should be ... so special as to die peacefully in my
> sleep? Insh'Allah. ... >
> ... > Ask and you shall receive.
> ...
> ... If you haven't tried it, don't knock it?
>
> Tried what - cigarettes or cancer?

Seek and ye shall find.

bernie


--
"Official ASC Shaman"

Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
> Let is be knownst that on Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:04:18 -0500, Marc
> Schneiderman <[email protected]> writted:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:37:08 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ... And there's no scientific evidence that secondary smoke kills
>>> anyone.
>>>
>>> No... only corpses.
>>
>>
>> Can you find a credible figure where second hand tobacco smoke was
>> listed as the cause of death on a death certificate? BTW, you won't,
>> as it doesn't.
>
> Oddly, neither does first hand tobacco smoke.
>
> You is a simple fella, ain't ya!
> --
> ---
> DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
> ---

Smoking was listed as an underlying cause on my mother's Wisconsin death
certificate.

bernie..


--
"Official ASC Shaman"

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:55:38 -0600, in rec.travel.europe, "btorvik2" <[email protected]>
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... > ...
... > ... If you haven't tried it, don't knock it?
... >
... > Tried what - cigarettes or cancer?
...
... Seek and ye shall find.

Sit down and wait, sac-à-puces...

"btorvik2" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>> Let is be knownst that on Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:04:18 -0500, Marc
>> Schneiderman <[email protected]> writted:
>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:37:08 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ... And there's no scientific evidence that secondary smoke kills
>>>> anyone.
>>>>
>>>> No... only corpses.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you find a credible figure where second hand tobacco smoke was
>>> listed as the cause of death on a death certificate? BTW, you won't,
>>> as it doesn't.
>>
>> Oddly, neither does first hand tobacco smoke.
>>
>> You is a simple fella, ain't ya!
>> --
>> ---
>> DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
>> ---
>
> Smoking was listed as an underlying cause on my mother's Wisconsin death
> certificate.
>
> bernie..


Listening to Dr. Dean Edell (sp?) on the radio a couple of years ago, he
said that when a person dies from a disease, regardless of age, and that
person smokes or smoked, it is officially listed as "smoking related"
whether or not the illness was caused by smoking or not.

"charliekilo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] et...
> "btorvik2" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>>> Let is be knownst that on Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:04:18 -0500, Marc
>>> Schneiderman <[email protected]> writted:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:37:08 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ... And there's no scientific evidence that secondary smoke kills
>>>>> anyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> No... only corpses.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you find a credible figure where second hand tobacco smoke was
>>>> listed as the cause of death on a death certificate? BTW, you won't,
>>>> as it doesn't.
>>>
>>> Oddly, neither does first hand tobacco smoke.
>>>
>>> You is a simple fella, ain't ya!
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
>>> ---
>>
>> Smoking was listed as an underlying cause on my mother's Wisconsin death
>> certificate.
>>
>> bernie..
>
>
> Listening to Dr. Dean Edell (sp?) on the radio a couple of years ago, he
> said that when a person dies from a disease, regardless of age, and that
> person smokes or smoked, it is officially listed as "smoking related"
> whether or not the illness was caused by smoking or not.

My fond wish is your wish be granted and you smoke three, no make that four
packs of cigarettes a day.

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:57:33 -0600, "btorvik2" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>Smoking was listed as an underlying cause on my mother's Wisconsin death
>certificate.

So sad to read. I hope it never resorts to "second hand tobacco
smoke."

CigarBaron

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:04:00 GMT, "charliekilo"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>and that
>person smokes or smoked, it is officially listed as "smoking related"
>whether or not the illness was caused by smoking or not.


I've never heard this before. Who lists it? That doesn't make any
sense.
CigarBaron

Let is be knownst that on Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:57:33 -0600, "btorvik2"
<[email protected]> writted:

>Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>> Let is be knownst that on Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:04:18 -0500, Marc
>> Schneiderman <[email protected]> writted:
>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:37:08 +0100, Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ... And there's no scientific evidence that secondary smoke kills
>>>> anyone.
>>>>
>>>> No... only corpses.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you find a credible figure where second hand tobacco smoke was
>>> listed as the cause of death on a death certificate? BTW, you won't,
>>> as it doesn't.
>>
>> Oddly, neither does first hand tobacco smoke.
>>
>> You is a simple fella, ain't ya!
>> --
>> ---
>> DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
>> ---
>
>Smoking was listed as an underlying cause on my mother's Wisconsin death
>certificate.

What did it say exactly?
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--