On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:27:10 +0200, Magda
<[email protected]> wrote:

    >On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:19:42 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
    >arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
    > ... Magda writes:
    > ...
    > ... > "Much" as in, zero to none ?
    > ...
    > ... Thank you. But I am wrong occasionally.
    >You just won't admit it publicly.

but *we* know don't we? :-)
--
Martin

Magda writes:

    > You just won't admit it publicly.

I will, and I have.

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:30:31 +0200, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
wrote:

    >Magda writes:
    >> You just won't admit it publicly.
    >I will, and I have.

Right you are forbidden. Wear the hair shirt until the end of the
week.
--
Martin

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:33:43 +0200, [email protected] wrote:

    >On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:30:31 +0200, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
    >wrote:
    >>Magda writes:
    >>> You just won't admit it publicly.
    >>I will, and I have.
    >Right you are forbidden. Wear the hair shirt until the end of the
    >week.

"forbidden"? I thought I wrote "forgiven"

I admit I made a mistake too.
--
Martin

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:19:42 +0200, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
wrote:

    >Magda writes:
    >> "Much" as in, zero to none ?
    >Thank you. But I am wrong occasionally.

No you are not. Here is proof:

http://www.mxsmanic.com/proof.html
---
DFM

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:38:13 +0200, [email protected] wrote:

    >On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:17:47 +0200, Magda
    ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >>On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 23:30:47 +0200, in rec.travel.europe, [email protected] arranged some
    >>electrons, so they looked like this :
    >> ... On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 23:22:52 +0200, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
    >> ... wrote:
    >> ...
    >> ... >[email protected] writes:
    >> ... >
    >> ... >> Why don't you admit you were wrong and move on?
    >> ... >
    >> ... >I do, when I'm wrong.
    >> ...
    >> ... I haven't seen much sign of it.
    >>"Much" as in, zero to none ?
    >I was being cautious :-)

And wisely. Witness below:

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=qr...ia54%404ax.com
---
DFM

Deep Frayed Morgues writes:

    > No you are not. Here is proof:
    >
    > http://www.mxsmanic.com/proof.html

Ponder on that.

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 04:49:08 +0200, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
wrote:

    >Deep Frayed Morgues writes:
    >> No you are not. Here is proof:
    >>
    >> http://www.mxsmanic.com/proof.html
    >Ponder on that.

Good advice, it says it all.
--
Martin