![]() |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8391390)
Rae, engage your brain, there is a difference between an untargeted general lashing out, and calling someone a tosser. Ive no wish to close every contentious thread on sight, and I dont read all the threads all the time, nor do I wish to, but if you think Im going to ignore it when you call someone a tosser if I see it, then you are mistaken.
Maybe we are not consistent, but hey, guess what, you get what you pay for, and we do the best we can. I think (hope) that by now most people on here know what to expect from us. Just go by the "Golden Rule", treat others as you would wish to be treated, and you wont go far wrong, save anything else for Facebook. I wouldnt wish to be called a tosser, so that's my moral reference in this sort of thing. are moderators not capable of accepting some constructive criticism? or are we all supposed to cower in fear at the thought of upsetting you? |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by rae
(Post 8391714)
i give up. i thought i put my argument to you very respectfully given your job on here and this is what i get back. as i say my defence is if the o/p starts along this vein they should expect to receive what they give. you have taken what was a general thought and opinion personally and overreacted, and for which i suppose i am now going to get a ban. i don't want to be called a whinging pom, but that does not seem to matter.
are moderators not capable of accepting some constructive criticism? or are we all supposed to cower in fear at the thought of upsetting you? I know yeah, draconian or what. I agree with you rae, you were respectful and that term "whingeing pohm" is an offensive term and I don't blame you if you don't like it being hurled at you, not even in a general way. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8391301)
It didnt seem to be directed at any one named or implied individual,
Therefore it was directed to the whole board, does that make it any better? That it was against everyone, all of us here because we of British extraction? |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by rae
(Post 8391714)
i don't want to be called a whinging pom, but that does not seem to matter.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8391390)
Rae, engage your brain, there is a difference between an untargeted general lashing out, and calling someone a tosser. Ive no wish to close every contentious thread on sight, and I dont read all the threads all the time, nor do I wish to, but if you think Im going to ignore it when you call someone a tosser if I see it, then you are mistaken.
Maybe we are not consistent, but hey, guess what, you get what you pay for, and we do the best we can. I think (hope) that by now most people on here know what to expect from us. Just go by the "Golden Rule", treat others as you would wish to be treated, and you wont go far wrong, save anything else for Facebook. I wouldnt wish to be called a tosser, so that's my moral reference in this sort of thing. "Tosser" |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Elizabeth I
(Post 8391427)
"whingeing pohm" was a real term of abuse and prejudice. My Dad emigrated to Australia in his mid twenties and said that term was used very derogatorily towards Brits (even if you weren't whingeing and obviously they weren't "pohms").
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by rae
(Post 8391714)
i give up. i thought i put my argument to you very respectfully given your job on here and this is what i get back. as i say my defence is if the o/p starts along this vein they should expect to receive what they give. you have taken what was a general thought and opinion personally and overreacted, and for which i suppose i am now going to get a ban. i don't want to be called a whinging pom, but that does not seem to matter.
are moderators not capable of accepting some constructive criticism? or are we all supposed to cower in fear at the thought of upsetting you? This does not single out a poster. It is merely a generalisation such as, for example, directing the comment, "whinging, whinning, limey, poms and luddites" to the users of an internet forum. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393163)
Whinging pom is often just a gentle ribbing between nations of the same race (like Aussie convict) where <the removed term> is often based in racism rather than micky taking nationalism. IMO, the two shouldn't be equated. But then, I would say that as I am an Aussie :)
Surely they're all just shortened versions of their country of origin and should cause no offence? |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 8393195)
So what's the difference between calling a person from Australia an "Aussie", a British person a "Brit", or a person from Pakistan a "Paki"?
Surely they're all just shortened versions of their country of origin and should cause no offence? |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by rae
(Post 8391714)
i give up. i thought i put my argument to you very respectfully given your job on here and this is what i get back. as i say my defence is if the o/p starts along this vein they should expect to receive what they give. you have taken what was a general thought and opinion personally and overreacted, and for which i suppose i am now going to get a ban. i don't want to be called a whinging pom, but that does not seem to matter.
are moderators not capable of accepting some constructive criticism? or are we all supposed to cower in fear at the thought of upsetting you? As you probably know by now, if you want to give constructive criticism then private messaging is the accepted medium, not posting on the forum. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Elizabeth I
(Post 8391809)
Therefore it was directed to the whole board, does that make it any better? That it was against everyone, all of us here because we of British extraction?
Anyway, there has been more than enough discussion of moderation on this thread, if you lot want to defend yourselves from the scurrilous accusations against you go ahead, but leave us mods out of it now. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393163)
Whinging pom is often just a gentle ribbing between nations of the same race (like Aussie convict) where <the removed term> is often based in racism rather than micky taking nationalism. IMO, the two shouldn't be equated. But then, I would say that as I am an Aussie :)
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 8393195)
So what's the difference between calling a person from Australia an "Aussie", a British person a "Brit", or a person from Pakistan a "Paki"?
Surely they're all just shortened versions of their country of origin and should cause no offence? |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393274)
Nothing wrong with it if an Australian says it because in Australia it always has just been a shortening....like we shorten all words....but in the UK the term Paki has been hijacked and taken on a much more sinister race based tone with a lot of British...so is best avoided there IMO....but then I'm not British so you lot may know more about it...
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393274)
Nothing wrong with it if an Australian says it because in Australia it always has just been a shortening....like we shorten all words....but in the UK the term Paki has been hijacked and taken on a much more sinister race based tone with a lot of British...so is best avoided there IMO....but then I'm not British so you lot may know more about it...
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:19 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.