US sanctions
#46
Re: US sanctions
Since only 8.8% of small farms use use it and the overall usage is roughly twice that....... I don't know. It's safe to say that it's the large producers that will be exporting, and they like to maximise their yield as much as anybody so you'll probably have to have trousers altered.
#48
Re: US sanctions
Trump's announcement of a US-Mexico agreement was bizarre. He seems intent on breaking alliances apart.
#51
Re: US sanctions
Not really. It appears to me that he believes he has struck a good deal with Mexico and has indicated that he will agree to a similar deal with Canada. Canada likely won't do so because, as outlined above, the Canadian government is not prepared to allow its citizens to obtain cheaper access to goods as it may piss off a few in Canada that control the market. Benefitting the few at the expense of the many.
It seems analogous to Brexit to me. The deal that Germany would likely be willing to strike with the UK will be different from the one that the UK will strike with the whole of EU. Just look at the issues that were raised by Wallonia (or whatever it is called) when Canada struck a deal with the EU. Far easier to tailor bi-lateral agreements that it is to tailor multi-lateral ones.
It seems analogous to Brexit to me. The deal that Germany would likely be willing to strike with the UK will be different from the one that the UK will strike with the whole of EU. Just look at the issues that were raised by Wallonia (or whatever it is called) when Canada struck a deal with the EU. Far easier to tailor bi-lateral agreements that it is to tailor multi-lateral ones.
#52
Re: US sanctions
All I can see with Trump is an interventionist. From what's been reported on the Mexico deal, requiring higher Mexican wages undermines trade (although Mexican factory workers won't, in the short term, be complaining).
Irrelevant to draw parallels with a non-EU Germany - it doesn't exist.
Irrelevant to draw parallels with a non-EU Germany - it doesn't exist.
#53
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: US sanctions
Map from the globe and mail last year.
Based on comments from both sides, seems the sticking point is dairy. WI is the only major producer (2nd largest) who voted Trump, and largest producer (California) didn't support Trump, so Trump could lower US subsidies to US dairy if Canada lowers the tariff amount on milk, butter and cheese, he will lose WI but if he gets a good deal in regards to autos he would keep the other rust belt states most likely happy.
Based on comments from both sides, seems the sticking point is dairy. WI is the only major producer (2nd largest) who voted Trump, and largest producer (California) didn't support Trump, so Trump could lower US subsidies to US dairy if Canada lowers the tariff amount on milk, butter and cheese, he will lose WI but if he gets a good deal in regards to autos he would keep the other rust belt states most likely happy.
#54
Re: US sanctions
All I can see with Trump is an interventionist. From what's been reported on the Mexico deal, requiring higher Mexican wages undermines trade (although Mexican factory workers won't, in the short term, be complaining).
Irrelevant to draw parallels with a non-EU Germany - it doesn't exist.
Irrelevant to draw parallels with a non-EU Germany - it doesn't exist.
#55
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: US sanctions
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nneYiBmeyr...0/IMG_4615.JPG
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...-9rDJK3bnbfvfq
https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99...05-138y4ri.jpg
Considering Canada does not permit artificial hormones in milk, doubtful they would permit said milk to be imported.
#56
Re: US sanctions
If your buying in the US you just have to read the label, the companies using milk free of artificial hormones are very happy to label their products as such.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nneYiBmeyr...0/IMG_4615.JPG
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...-9rDJK3bnbfvfq
https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99...05-138y4ri.jpg
Considering Canada does not permit artificial hormones in milk, doubtful they would permit said milk to be imported.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nneYiBmeyr...0/IMG_4615.JPG
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...-9rDJK3bnbfvfq
https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99...05-138y4ri.jpg
Considering Canada does not permit artificial hormones in milk, doubtful they would permit said milk to be imported.
#57
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830
Re: US sanctions
Hormones may be the least of it
https://www.theguardian.com/environm...childrens-food
https://www.theguardian.com/environm...childrens-food
#58
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: US sanctions
Hormones may be the least of it
https://www.theguardian.com/environm...childrens-food
https://www.theguardian.com/environm...childrens-food
Can't use pesticides for decades and not expect it to not end up in our water and food.
Good start would be to ban it at the retail consumer level where I doubt most are using it correctly let alone disposing of it correctly.
#59
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830
Re: US sanctions
Certainly not unique to the US, that pesticide is available and used in Canada as well and found in our domestic food as well.
Can't use pesticides for decades and not expect it to not end up in our water and food.
Good start would be to ban it at the retail consumer level where I doubt most are using it correctly let alone disposing of it correctly.
Can't use pesticides for decades and not expect it to not end up in our water and food.
Good start would be to ban it at the retail consumer level where I doubt most are using it correctly let alone disposing of it correctly.
#60
Banned
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 19,879
Re: US sanctions
Roundup has been banned in Ontario for years.