![]() |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12558541)
Besides larger prison costs, do longer sentences reduce crime by a significant amount? Are they useful?
They sound good on paper and in the media and it will win elections, but do long sentences work in reality? As someone that was once a prison officer I can tell you that the same people kept coming back time after time. At least until they hit their mid thirties to early forties. It appeared that, until such an age, they saw prison as an occupational hazard as they believed that crime was the only way they could get what they wanted. However, upon reaching such an age, it appeared to dawn on them just how much time they had "lost" and, at that time, they had additional motivation to make a change. The more "humane" the conditions inside prison, the more it costs to keep them there. The more humane, the less the incentive to avoid returning. I don't know what the answer is, but I am confident that politicians don't have the answers either. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by plasticcanuck
(Post 12558532)
There are already laws in place for persons with and illegally using registered firearms. The problems with shootings in the GTA is that probably all firearms used are unregistered, so are in the hands of thugs and killers. I don't see this at all. I think the problem with the shootings in the GTA is that people get shot. The status of the weapons used is neither here nor there, people would be no less shot if the guns were registered.
Originally Posted by plasticcanuck
(Post 12558532)
You said my comments were Thatcheresque. I don’t quite understand this
Originally Posted by plasticcanuck
(Post 12558532)
Do you have any suggestions on how to deal with the situation? I'm speculating here but I suppose much of the gun violence to be profit driven and related to the drug trade; the answer to that is simple enough, end the drug prohibition, tax the drugs. If deried, use the tax revenue to lock up the remaining shooters. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12558541)
Besides larger prison costs, do longer sentences reduce crime by a significant amount? Are they useful?
, They sound good on paper and in the media and it will win elections, but do long sentences work in reality? |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by plasticcanuck
(Post 12558601)
There are lies, damn lies, then there are statistics. Society must stop mollycoddling violent criminals. They must be taken off the streets regardless of whether or not it reduces crime. At least while locked up they won’t be adding to statistics. If you know a better way to deal with them I’d like to hear it. For the most part these thugs cannot be educated or retrained. Many of them are just bad people who have no place in a civilized society. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
There was a statistical analysis done by some research group a few years ago in Britain.
It showed that the longer the incarceration, the less likely to reoffend. Long sentences seem beneficial as a whole to me. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by daveincolchester
(Post 12558692)
There was a statistical analysis done by some research group a few years ago in Britain.
It showed that the longer the incarceration, the less likely to reoffend. Long sentences seem beneficial as a whole to me. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12558696)
Sentences of over 100 years do seem likely to reduce the incidence of recidivism, if the sentences in question are shorter than that then a link would be of interest.
But I do remember newspaper articles and TV documentaries about "soft" prisons in Europe (The Netherlands seems to stand out in my mind) with prison cells more like cosy bedsits with all the comforts of home and very low reoffending rates. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12558918)
That was my thought too, although I wasn't quite thinking a century.
But I do remember newspaper articles and TV documentaries about "soft" prisons in Europe (The Netherlands seems to stand out in my mind) with prison cells more like cosy bedsits with all the comforts of home and very low reoffending rates. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
1 Attachment(s)
|
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by daveincolchester
(Post 12559195)
|
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12559357)
I'm surprised at the low rates of reoffending shown, according to that document two-thirds of adult offenders do not reoffend within a year, but I don't see any correlation between the rate of reoffending and the length of the sentence; is it in there somewhere?
|
Re: Toronto Shooting
It just goes on and on and on and on and on Now a shoot out near Nigara https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.4813465 |
Re: Toronto Shooting
I had a scare on Sunday. I went out for a run by the lake. My normal route consists of running from Dan Leckie down to near British Colombia drive following a lake shore trail. I then drink from a water cooler. Do some leg exercises because my knees are a bit feeble and run back. It's 3 km's in each direction and takes 40 to 50 minutes depending on my bodies condition that day.
On the way home as I ran through Coronation Park there was an army of police and spectators. It transpired that someone was shot dead right on my route. I had missed the incident by a mere 5 minutes as I ran outward. The problem with Toronto in my opinion is they never seem to catch anyone for the shootings so people know they'll get away with it. They're going to increase. ​​​​​​https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toron...park-1.4808973 |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Agreed James, it’s daily now, sometimes a few in a day it madness and nothing is being done, or seen to be done. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:02 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.