![]() |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Seems most of the recent mass shooters in the US were not on anyones radar and had not done anything prior to make it onto anyones radar.
While the individual in Toronto was known to have mental health issues is it known if he had told anyone recently of his thoughts and plans? If not how would anyone know to place him in a long term facility? For those who study mass shootings and shooters the conseus seems to be they are difficult to predict and a masd shooter is not necessairly mentally ill. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12539426)
is it known if he had told anyone recently of his thoughts and plans?
https://globalnews.ca/news/4352671/d...rk-collegiate/ |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12539426)
For those who study mass shootings and shooters the conseus seems to be they are difficult to predict and a masd shooter is not necessairly mentally ill.
And, yes, I know that gun control doesn't address rogue drivers, mass poisonings or aircraft hijacking. It's not a panacea. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Is this how society should move forward DBD. Remove things that are not necessary. Cars that do more than 100kmh, pleasure boats, fishing rods for people who throw the fish back? Golf and other useless sports. Should we use the same reasoning in everything we do or don’t do? |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12539439)
Is this how society should move forward DBD. Remove things that are not necessary. Cars that do more than 100kmh, pleasure boats, fishing rods for people who throw the fish back? Golf and other useless sports. Should we use the same reasoning in everything we do or don’t do? |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 12539441)
Apart from golf, none of those things is a pestilence on the rest of society.
|
Re: Toronto Shooting
From random people being gunned down and the sadness of it........ to golf.
I shouldn't be surprised really should I, lol. :D |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by Siouxie
(Post 12539464)
From random people being gunned down and the sadness of it........ to golf.
I shouldn't be surprised really should I, lol. :D |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12539439)
Is this how society should move forward DBD. Remove things that are not necessary. Cars that do more than 100kmh, pleasure boats, fishing rods for people who throw the fish back? Golf and other useless sports. Should we use the same reasoning in everything we do or don’t do? |
Re: Toronto Shooting
well Toronto voted to ban hand guns overwhelmingly so a up and coming criminal/mass shooter will will be unable to go and apply for a gun licence and after extensive checks buy his weapon of choice and register it. Because they will be banned |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12539507)
well Toronto voted to ban hand guns overwhelmingly so a up and coming criminal/mass shooter will will not be unable to go and apply for a gun licence and after extensive checks buy his weapon of choice and register it. Because they will be banned My criterion for banning items/activities, btw, is that unless something causes direct harm to people who have not chosen to participate there's no reason to ban it. Hand guns and automatic weapons, existing as they do to cause direct harm, are a reasonable thing to ban. Golf, while an activity for people who are a blight on society, is on the cusp - it's a stretch to argue that poisoning the ground, dressing badly and buying old man cars is directly harmful to others. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
There is no end to these shootings, it’s a daily thing now. Banning legal gun owners appears to be the way the Gov are going ahead to fix this. Bigger sentences and no leniency on illegal gun carry would be a better Route |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 12556197)
There is no end to these shootings, it’s a daily thing now. Banning legal gun owners appears to be the way the Gov are going ahead to fix this. Bigger sentences and no leniency on illegal gun carry would be a better Route As to the banning of citizens having hand guns and assault rifles, I am sympathetic to this argument. On a personal note, I am aware of very limited legitimate reasons for anyone to have access to such firearms other than law enforcement agencies and the military. ​​ |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by macadian
(Post 12556234)
Agreed, but the sensible remedies you allude to would be so objectionable to our more liberal minded citizens....if we can rehabilitate (according to selfie boy) terrorists, of the isis persuasion why not the perpetrators of gun related crime?
As to the banning of citizens having hand guns and assault rifles, I am sympathetic to this argument. On a personal note, I am aware of very limited legitimate reasons for anyone to have access to such firearms other than law enforcement agencies and the military. ​​ When did it become legal to carry a handgun in Ontario? It wasn't when I got my license and, at that time, although there were more legally held machine guns and assault rifles in Canada than in the US, they were all grandfathered. No new permits were being issued. All this talk of banning is nonsense, they're already banned. Of course, it doesn't matter what's banned in Canada when there's an open border with the US so the route to reducing gun crime in Toronto is to reduce the influence of the NRA, elect Democrats, introduce gun control in the US and wait 100 years. |
Re: Toronto Shooting
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12556289)
Of course, it doesn't matter what's banned in Canada when there's an open border with the US so the route to reducing gun crime in Toronto is to reduce the influence of the NRA, elect Democrats, introduce gun control in the US and wait 100 years.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:35 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.