Today's shootings

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 25th 2018, 5:51 pm
  #76  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 232
jerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

The gun numbers: just 3% of American adults own a collective 133m firearms

Facts show owning more than 40 guns is actually fairly common in the United States, and violence falls most heavily on the country’s poorest neighborhoods

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-133m-firearms
jerryhung is offline  
Old Feb 25th 2018, 5:51 pm
  #77  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 232
jerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Think the above speaks to dbd's point earlier
jerryhung is offline  
Old Feb 25th 2018, 5:52 pm
  #78  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 232
jerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by sharkus
Horrible as it may sound, I really do wish that some republican official type does end up having one of their kids killed in a school shooting. Maybe, just maybe that might hit home a little more than some other kids they have no feeling at all for.

Cynic in me says it'll do sweet FA, that the person will find something or someone other to blame for what happened, and won't focus on the gun issue, regardless of the fact one of their own flesh and blood is dead.
I find that a converted Republican becomes a Democrat and/or a sworn enemy of the Republican party

But yes judging by the values of the current Republicans they seem like a bunch of amoral people. Look at Corker and his about turn. Flake voted for the tax bill because he would personally benefit. These people are .. <speechless.>
jerryhung is offline  
Old Feb 25th 2018, 5:55 pm
  #79  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 232
jerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond reputejerryhung has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by mahdawg
I'd say the best bet is airport style security i.e. metal detectors, guard at each entrance. Expensive I know, but given the amount of money countries tend to flush down the loo, it'd be a drop in the ocean.

It's not ideal, and not pretty, but it's the only thing I could see political parties agreeing on.
Sorry but that's just wishful thinking. Are you going to put metal detectors in open air cinemas, concerts, malls, etc. What about a full military society where everyone is chipped and bagged - I am sure this is a NRA/Republicans' wet dream.

The best bet is to ban all assault weapons, register all hand guns, limit gun ownership and take on the loons at the NRA and right wing sites. And Rupert Murdoch's Fox of course which is the epitome of private owned propaganda in my opinion.
jerryhung is offline  
Old Feb 25th 2018, 6:07 pm
  #80  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 101
mahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by jerryhung
Sorry but that's just wishful thinking. Are you going to put metal detectors in open air cinemas, concerts, malls, etc. What about a full military society where everyone is chipped and bagged - I am sure this is a NRA/Republicans' wet dream.

The best bet is to ban all assault weapons, register all hand guns, limit gun ownership and take on the loons at the NRA and right wing sites. And Rupert Murdoch's Fox of course which is the epitome of private owned propaganda in my opinion.
I am only talking about schools, as although we should all be able to lead safe, care free lives, children should be protected the most.

The part in bold will never happen in anyone's lifetime. That is wishful thinking. Hence why I suggested other alternative's.

Still we live in Canada, so I don't care. Gun ownership here is controlled, regulated so all is good
mahdawg is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2018, 4:07 pm
  #81  
Assimilated Pauper
 
dbd33's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 40,018
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by mahdawg
I am only talking about schools, as although we should all be able to lead safe, care free lives, children should be protected the most.
Last week we stayed in a house across the road from a middle school in Los Angeles. First thing in the morning there were very many young people on the playing fields practising a game they misguidedly call soccer. In the evening there were very many young people practising netball. This sort of behavior went on every day.

It's a bit lost on me how metal detectors and security screens would help protect the students from a shooter on the street. Should the fields have walls around them such as carve up Belfast and Brampton? Could these walls do double duty by keeping out Mexican students?
dbd33 is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2018, 4:21 pm
  #82  
Listen to the Music
 
dave_j's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Fraser Valley BC
Posts: 4,723
dave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by dbd33
Should the fields have walls around them such as carve up Belfast and Brampton? Could these walls do double duty by keeping out Mexican students?
I'm not making a point here merely an observation and something I haven't thought about for a long time.

I went to an inner London primary school built by the victorians. It was surrounded by a high brick wall and there were only two standard width doors opening into the inner playground for people, one marked Boys and the other Girls, each fitted with a substantial steel gate. I wonder why the victorians thought it necessary to isolate the school from 'outside', what threats did they see? Whatever they were, they did something about it or were they simply trying to stop anyone escaping?

Last edited by dave_j; Feb 26th 2018 at 4:23 pm.
dave_j is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2018, 7:32 pm
  #83  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 101
mahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond reputemahdawg has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by dbd33
Last week we stayed in a house across the road from a middle school in Los Angeles. First thing in the morning there were very many young people on the playing fields practising a game they misguidedly call soccer. In the evening there were very many young people practising netball. This sort of behavior went on every day.

It's a bit lost on me how metal detectors and security screens would help protect the students from a shooter on the street. Should the fields have walls around them such as carve up Belfast and Brampton? Could these walls do double duty by keeping out Mexican students?
I always thought the walls in Belfast were quite scenic when I was growing up I joke.

Definitely they wouldn't prevent it. Just my suggestion on damage limitation to a sad situation. There's probably not many ideas you can come up with that both the Republicans & Democrats would agree on
mahdawg is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2018, 8:01 pm
  #84  
Magnificently Withering
 
Oakvillian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 6,891
Oakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by dave_j
I'm not making a point here merely an observation and something I haven't thought about for a long time.

I went to an inner London primary school built by the victorians. It was surrounded by a high brick wall and there were only two standard width doors opening into the inner playground for people, one marked Boys and the other Girls, each fitted with a substantial steel gate. I wonder why the victorians thought it necessary to isolate the school from 'outside', what threats did they see? Whatever they were, they did something about it or were they simply trying to stop anyone escaping?
Well done: you've managed to completely miss the point, it's over there somewhere.

Primary schools (whether Victorian or otherwise) tend to have enclosed schoolyards or playgrounds to ensure that young children do not go wandering off school property during break times. In Victorian cities, the building material of choice was brick; in modern suburbs most elementary schools have some sort of chain-link fence surrounding the property. The purpose of either is not to prevent shooters getting in (hardly a priority in late 19th Century London) but to prevent children getting out and getting lost.
Oakvillian is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2018, 8:43 pm
  #85  
`
 
BEVS's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 38,613
BEVS has disabled reputation
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by dave_j
I'm not making a point here merely an observation and something I haven't thought about for a long time.

I went to an inner London primary school built by the victorians. It was surrounded by a high brick wall and there were only two standard width doors opening into the inner playground for people, one marked Boys and the other Girls, each fitted with a substantial steel gate. I wonder why the victorians thought it necessary to isolate the school from 'outside', what threats did they see? Whatever they were, they did something about it or were they simply trying to stop anyone escaping?
My infant/junior schools were like this.

That was to keep the children (us) in. Help stop truancy as well.

It was not to keep someone out.
BEVS is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2018, 8:48 pm
  #86  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

This school was chosen for a new form of security system, been in place since 2015 and at the time the cost was 400,000.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ana/362210002/


My high school was surrounded by steel bar fencing, chain link fence can easily be cut or climbed. It was put in place both to keep students in, and people out who were not staff or students. Only easy way in was through the schools office.
scrubbedexpat091 is offline  
Old Mar 5th 2018, 8:17 pm
  #87  
Listen to the Music
 
dave_j's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Fraser Valley BC
Posts: 4,723
dave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond reputedave_j has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

I listened to the radio this morning concerning the ongoing discussions that surround updating ICBC, the monopolistic insolvent auto insurance institution of BC. It reminded me of an argument put forward by the gun lobby, it goes something linke this. 'Guns don't kill people, it's the user that does that.'

Now auto insurance in BC insures the car not the driver with the end result that poor driving isn't penalised, but this goes contrarywise to that above in that it argues that it's the car that kills and the driver's simply a passenger. But clearly ICBC's support of this delivers the result that there are some very strange driving habits in BC.

So how does this affect gun ownership in the US. Well clearly the geni is out of the bottle in the US but why not take a step sideways and take a lesson from ICBC. Once you accept that gun ownership is something that's never going to change, perhaps law makers could introduce compulsory insurance for gun ownership with, like auto insurance, a sliding scale of premiums depending on a percieved gun risk type. It would provide a fund for medical expenses for those injured by firearms and might, just might, make those with 50 or so guns think twice about ownership of so many. Of course this would require the existence of a gun registry so it won't happen.... but perhaps with the prospect of new business potential the insurance lobby could take on the NRA and the insurance lobby has far deeper pockets... A gun licence in all but name.

Last edited by dave_j; Mar 5th 2018 at 8:51 pm.
dave_j is offline  
Old Mar 5th 2018, 9:13 pm
  #88  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830
Aviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by dave_j
So how does this affect gun ownership in the US. Well clearly the geni is out of the bottle in the US but why not take a step sideways and take a lesson from ICBC. Once you accept that gun ownership is something that's never going to change, perhaps law makers could introduce compulsory insurance for gun ownership with, like auto insurance, a sliding scale of premiums depending on a percieved gun risk type. It would provide a fund for medical expenses for those injured by firearms and might, just might, make those with 50 or so guns think twice about ownership of so many. Of course this would require the existence of a gun registry so it won't happen.... but perhaps with the prospect of new business potential the insurance lobby could take on the NRA and the insurance lobby has far deeper pockets... A gun licence in all but name.
Trump did a great job of deflecting the gun issue last week. Tariffs on steel and aluminum, now the big talking point, the NRA and gun control seems to be lost in the news somewhere!
Aviator is offline  
Old Mar 5th 2018, 9:53 pm
  #89  
Stand-up Philosopher
 
caretaker's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Regina Saskatchewan
Posts: 16,344
caretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond reputecaretaker has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by Aviator
Trump did a great job of deflecting the gun issue last week. Tariffs on steel and aluminum, now the big talking point, the NRA and gun control seems to be lost in the news somewhere!
All those things are diversions from Russiagate and obstruction of justice, he can't be impeached for guns or aluminum.
caretaker is offline  
Old Mar 5th 2018, 11:01 pm
  #90  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830
Aviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Today's shootings

Originally Posted by caretaker
All those things are diversions from Russiagate and obstruction of justice, he can't be impeached for guns or aluminum.
So long as the media don't get distracted by these side shows!
Aviator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.