![]() |
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by Souvenir
(Post 6581380)
Few women would disagree with you.
<ducks> |
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 6581389)
I would.
<ducks> <retreats to bunker> |
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 6581389)
I would.
<ducks> Normal and fat! unfort a lot of girls and women now have the idea that they must be Super skinny and have lost sight of "normal!. |
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 6581414)
i think there is a world of difference between super skinny/ anorexic
|
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 6581417)
Granted. I think Kate Moss is about right. Posh a bit stick insecty.
nowadays 10 /12 uk isconsidered large - which really it isnt. |
Re: Suitable role models?
and now as a fantastic role model for my 13 yr old I am off for a lie down before end of term church service as I partook in too much champagne this afternoon at lunch for my friends 40th! oops!
|
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 6581437)
Kate Moss is good as a model - but considerably smaller than the average normal size
|
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 6581414)
i think there is a world of difference between super skinny/ anorexic
Normal and fat! unfort a lot of girls and women now have the idea that they must be Super skinny and have lost sight of "normal!. |
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 6581453)
I don't think one should differentiate between models and women in general, I do think an attractive figure is one that's considerably smaller than average normal sized.
|
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by Souvenir
(Post 6581460)
Come to Canada poppet. You will find that "normal" is for a teenage girl to have a gut like a darts player and still stretch tight tops over the torso.
|
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 6581466)
yes but in reall life she really is vv tiny - and short! and unless you are borm with such genes no anountof dieting or excecise will get you to that size without makingyourself ill - anorexic!
Souvette has been large in the past. I've seen the photos. She is currently 125lbs, is five foot five and a 34c-26-34. This is because of a proper diet and regular exercise; she jogs a lot. She will be 46 in a couple of weeks and still turns the heads of men young enough to be her kids. The "gene" excuse is weak, unless there is a gene that makes people eat Big Macs for lunch every day. |
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 6581466)
yes but in reall life she really is vv tiny - and short! and unless you are borm with such genes no anountof dieting or excecise will get you to that size without makingyourself ill - anorexic!
|
Re: Suitable role models?
sensible eating will get you to a healthy weight for your height and excercise will tone the muscles but only severe calorie retsriction will get most people to a supermodel size. That will not result in a healthy body.
I can turn heads and am not large -BUT am def not supermodel sized! |
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 6581807)
That will not result in a healthy body.
|
Re: Suitable role models?
Originally Posted by bazzz
(Post 6582467)
What exactly is unhealthy about it?
A certain level of body fat is required for many critical hormonal functions. There are of course numerous other serious health effects from reaching an underweight condition through extremely low food intake (rather than just having a naturally high metabolism rate), including Heart, Kidney and Liver damage. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:17 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.