![]() |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Butch Cassidy
(Post 7729505)
NO, the way you prove that (at least in AB) is by driving a bigger truck:sneaky:
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Butch Cassidy
(Post 7729505)
NO, the way you prove that (at least in AB) is by driving a bigger truck:sneaky:
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Posidrive
(Post 7729513)
The general idea of humans eating animals has nothing wrong with it. We evolved as omnivores and animal meat provides many of the basic nutrients, vitamins and minerals that we need to survive. I have never seen a healthy vegan who has not resorted to taking artifical supplements to cope with their dietary defficiencies.
As for an individual or group of individuals hunting for food it depends upon the circumstances. For the native first nations population who live in some of the least hospitible areas, it is a way of life and the only option so that they do not starve. I can't see Safeway opening up too many stores for them. I'm sure that these people take no pleasure in the kill. As for hunting to either obtain some either cheap or better tasting meat, I don't really see that that makes the hunters any better than those who do it for sport. In this day and age it just isn't necessery to go out kill an innocent wild animal. We have evolved (not necessirily for the better) so that our food production methods are no longer part of the natural food chain, so we should keep out of it. Factory farming of animals is another issue outside of this post. All I'll say is that whenever possible we try to eat free range/organically produced meat products although I'm pretty sure that some of this is just marketing hype. You are making no sense at all. What could possibly be more organic than wild game? |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 7729528)
You are making no sense at all.
What could possibly be more organic than wild game? I'm sure that wild game tastes wonderful, but what gives anyone the right to go out and end the life of an animal when it is just not necessery. Oh dear, I can feel my blood starting to boil. :) |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Posidrive
(Post 7729547)
Organically farmed animals are "reasonably well" cared for and as is sadly the case do not know about a better life outside of their corral or whatever you want to call it. The provide a better quality of meat to those who can afford it and in that class I would include those who can afford the guns, ammunition, big trucks, etc to go hunting. Farmed animals are an unfortunate necessity of modern life regardless of how they are farmed. I just wish more people could afford those that are farmed more humanely.
I'm sure that wild game tastes wonderful, but what gives anyone the right to go out and end the life of an animal when it is just not necessery. Oh dear, I can feel my blood starting to boil. :) |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Posidrive
(Post 7729513)
The general idea of humans eating animals has nothing wrong with it. We evolved as omnivores and animal meat provides many of the basic nutrients, vitamins and minerals that we need to survive. I have never seen a healthy vegan who has not resorted to taking artifical supplements to cope with their dietary defficiencies.
As for an individual or group of individuals hunting for food it depends upon the circumstances. For the native first nations population who live in some of the least hospitible areas, it is a way of life and the only option so that they do not starve. I can't see Safeway opening up too many stores for them. I'm sure that these people take no pleasure in the kill. As for hunting to either obtain some either cheap or better tasting meat, I don't really see that that makes the hunters any better than those who do it for sport. In this day and age it just isn't necessery to go out kill an innocent wild animal. We have evolved (not necessirily for the better) so that our food production methods are no longer part of the natural food chain, so we should keep out of it. Factory farming of animals is another issue outside of this post. All I'll say is that whenever possible we try to eat free range/organically produced meat products although I'm pretty sure that some of this is just marketing hype. It's a more sustainable way of eating meat, better than mass produced farming. Animals can't be described as innocent or guilty they don't really have a conscience. I don't like the idiots I have met who talk about the great feeling you get when you get a kill, those who parade into Timmies with camo on their faces and oozing bravado. I have respect for those who hunt, kill, and then eat the animals. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
I never had any interest in hunting whilst in the UK. Now I am here and surrounded by it I have taken an interest in it. My OH bought me a crossbow for Xmas last year and I would love to go hunting with it.
However I want to hunt wild turkeys and we don't have any of those near here...lol |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by AmyDavid
(Post 7729581)
I never had any interest in hunting whilst in the UK. Now I am here and surrounded by it I have taken an interest in it. My OH bought me a crossbow for Xmas last year and I would love to go hunting with it.
However I want to hunt wild turkeys and we don't have any of those near here...lol Also we are thinking about farming some turkey's,if we do would you like to come over with the crossbow? |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by AmyDavid
(Post 7729581)
However I want to hunt wild turkeys and we don't have any of those near here...lol
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Posidrive
(Post 7729230)
Personally I find the whole idea of hunting and killing an animal for sport/pleasure to be quite barbaric.
me too ...
Originally Posted by fledermaus
(Post 7729299)
Yup, this is what you shoot into the animal to kill it
http://www.3riversarchery.com/Broadh...70_p0_cat.html What do you feel about killing animals for food?? I am a veggie! |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Posidrive
(Post 7729513)
The general idea of humans eating animals has nothing wrong with it. We evolved as omnivores and animal meat provides many of the basic nutrients, vitamins and minerals that we need to survive. I have never seen a healthy vegan who has not resorted to taking artifical supplements to cope with their dietary defficiencies.
As for an individual or group of individuals hunting for food it depends upon the circumstances. For the native first nations population who live in some of the least hospitible areas, it is a way of life and the only option so that they do not starve. I can't see Safeway opening up too many stores for them. I'm sure that these people take no pleasure in the kill. As for hunting to either obtain some either cheap or better tasting meat, I don't really see that that makes the hunters any better than those who do it for sport. In this day and age it just isn't necessery to go out kill an innocent wild animal. We have evolved (not necessirily for the better) so that our food production methods are no longer part of the natural food chain, so we should keep out of it. Factory farming of animals is another issue outside of this post. All I'll say is that whenever possible we try to eat free range/organically produced meat products although I'm pretty sure that some of this is just marketing hype. Are the animals killed for supermarket food not innocent then? As I said, I really can't see the point. Why can't those that wish to experience the skill use paintball - surely, hitting those that one is hunting, while they are trying to hunt you, has to be more skilful better than hitting something that cannot hit back:confused: |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 7729591)
Would you please post some pictures after 1st hunting trip.I can't wait.
Also we are thinking about farming some turkey's,if we do would you like to come over with the crossbow? |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 7728974)
Nah, that one's done to death.
Originally Posted by fledermaus
(Post 7729098)
A crossbow is more accurate still, and faster. So would be better for a large animal.
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 7729602)
me too ...
I am a veggie! If so, well done I admire your resolve. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 7729608)
The moose, or the story??
It's much easier for most people to reload regular bows than crossbows though. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by fledermaus
(Post 7729611)
No leather shoes, handbags, belts? veggie cheese? wine? beer? No fishscales used in your eyemake up and lipstick? No animal products used in your healthcare? No leather in the car? Nothing on that plane that got you here?
If so, well done I admire your resolve. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
My personal opinion (feel free to disregard as I'm a veggie) - it's far more humane to shoot a moose which has had a happy few years mosying about, doing his thing until one day a hunter comes along and kills him. The hunter then takes him home and has meat in his freezer for his friends and family for a good long time.
A cow/chicken/pig brought into the world through artificial insemination, kept in rubbish conditions, fed artificial hormones, put in a truck with heaps of other animals, driven to a slaughter house and then killed. Pretty crappy life if you ask me. On a lighter note, last year we had some workmen in getting the roof/siding done. One of them was just back from central newfoundland where he had been hunting for a week (he'd a licence for one moose in that area) and hadn't seen any moose at all for the entire week. As they were having a natter that morning, a moose walked up our drive and past them. PMSL. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 7729624)
Nahh not a vegan!! but do try to go for veggie winr. bear, lack of leather, , ,veggie makeup etc. . .sometimes its difficult and you have to go with the flow
If you don't believe in eating animals then surely wearing a smear of haddock across the eyelids is even more unnecessary? Most of those other things aren't really hard to find. What do you do then to avoid this? Do you insist that your hosts cook veggie food for you ?? When do you decide that its ok to kill for a Tylenol but not for some protein? |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by pinkmcfarquhar
(Post 7729629)
My personal opinion (feel free to disregard as I'm a veggie) - it's far more humane to shoot a moose which has had a happy few years mosying about, doing his thing until one day a hunter comes along and kills him. The hunter then takes him home and has meat in his freezer for his friends and family for a good long time.
A cow/chicken/pig brought into the world through artificial insemination, kept in rubbish conditions, fed artificial hormones, put in a truck with heaps of other animals, driven to a slaughter house and then killed. Pretty crappy life if you ask me. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Tenuous link here but on the subject of fish and eyes, whenever I cut the head off a freshly caught trout, I can't look it in the eye. On the odd occasion I have done this, I get a mental picture (usually for the remainder of the day) of the thing staring at me, looking very unhappy about being decapitated.
No clue why I feel so guilty, they taste so good and it's feels so natural, being able to catch and cook lunch.
Originally Posted by fledermaus
(Post 7729633)
If you don't believe in eating animals then surely wearing a smear of haddock across the eyelids is even more unnecessary?
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 7729624)
Nahh not a vegan!! but do try to go for veggie winr. bear, lack of leather, , ,veggie makeup etc. . .sometimes its difficult and you have to go with the flow
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 7729663)
I completely agree with this. We should aim to give animals as natural a life as we can before killing them, factory hens are one extreme, wild moose another, we should feel more guilt about eating the hen than the moose.
I'm pretty sure you wouldn't have seen many obese cavemen, and I doubt many were vegetarians or vegans either. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by mandymoochops
(Post 7728788)
As its a huge sport in North America and I haven't seen any discussion about it here I thought I would venture into the world of hunting.
It wasn't something that I was in the slightest bit interested in or tbh educated about in the UK so was in the - oh its cruel to just hunt for sport camp. Now being here in Canada in the boonies, hunting is quite possibly the biggest thing that guys (and girls) partake in between August and April (various seasons for differing types of animal and weapon. I can see the attraction, and tbh all the guys I know that hunt are very respectful of their surroundings and the limitations on their tags and don't go (too far) beyond the boundries (ok so making your own gate through a hedge with an old farm truck whilst chasing a big whitetail may be something I may have - ahem - seen on an occasion!) You apply to shoot your animals, you don't just grab a gun and randomly blast away, you do not get 'drawn' for everything you apply for - sometimes it takes years to get drawn for something like a big horn sheep. So this limits what is shot and keeps the population down which in turn makes for healthy herds in the future. What are your thoughts on the subject, have any of you ever hunted proper as opposed to taking pot shots at gophers and suchlike, and would it be something that you would consider having a go at. My personal stance is its exciting, takes a lot of skill and next year will be applying for my own tags if I am practised enough to take a deer with one shot - am currently practising with a bow too. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
I use beauty without cruelty makeup and if I go to dinner at peeps houses I tell em I am veggie - most peeps I know - or did know in the uk knew I was veggie.
I dont disagree with the killing of an animal to feed a family etc but I dont think I could do it! ps dont use Tylenol! |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
I consider myself to be something of an animal lover, and would always opt for the more "ethical" meats than your standard supermarket option.
I've never been hunting- I once ran over a squirrel running over the motorway and I was gutted for the rest of the day. However, I'm finding myself strangely drawn to giving hunting a try. I've no desire to kill an animal for the fun of it. However, I'd much rather kill something with my own hands (or rifle, preferably:p) and then eat it, knowing it's lived a natural life, than buy supermarket rubbish, knowing the animals have probably never even seen day light. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 7729663)
We should aim to give animals as natural a life as we can before killing them, factory hens are one extreme, wild moose another, we should feel more guilt about eating the hen than the moose.
Slightly off topic, you quite often see unfortunate road kill at the side of the road here in Alberta that has quite obviously had the head removed. Are there a group of pseudo hunters around who like to pretent that they hunt but don't actually? Or is it a bit like the "size of your truck" issue mentioned in an earlier post? |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Posidrive
(Post 7729749)
Can't argue with that. But at least (or so I would hope) those who end the hen's life aren't having a jolly good time doing it. Getting any pleasure or satisfaction at all out of killing an animal yourself is just plain wrong. It's not as if it's an even contest so what has the hunter to be proud of?
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by jericho
(Post 7729757)
Then I assume you missed all those Dispatches/Jamie Oliver documentaries about the conditions factory chickens are raised in? They showed live turkeys being kicked around like footballs.
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by mandymoochops
(Post 7728814)
Also remember not everyone fills there tags, most hunters will pass up on something that is too young rather than kill for the sake of it, some are not lucky enough to even find what they are drawn for, I've also seen people use their tags on injured or wounded animals so that they don't die a slow painful death, rather than let it go so they can get their "trophy".
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Posidrive
(Post 7729749)
Can't argue with that. But at least (or so I would hope) those who end the hen's life aren't having a jolly good time doing it. Getting any pleasure or satisfaction at all out of killing an animal yourself is just plain wrong. It's not as if it's an even contest so what has the hunter to be proud of?
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by flashman
(Post 7729717)
It's equivalent to Fox Hunting in the UK except that the critters are bigger !
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 7729811)
This is lost on many who don't hunt unfortunately, oh well. The young man in this video shows some great patience and steadfast nerve.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=crn_nbdVau0&feature=related |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
What not being said here is that the vast majority of the non native hunters in North America are in it for the Kill the meat is but a bonus
I don’t have any issues with eating meat wild or domesticated, the reality is we can’t sustain a wild population to feed the mouths we have so the domesticated animal is required for a population of its current size, the merits of either is just a novel smokescreen Hunting with high tech weaponry be that a modern compound bow, high powered rifle with night vision using masking scents modern lures etc is hardly fair and hardy a difficult set of skills to master, in a lot of respects for many it is a legalized form of violence against animals to feed the needs of the inner bully |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Ooh, another hunting thread and I missed it yesterday. I'll be fashionably late to the party...
Originally Posted by Posidrive
(Post 7729513)
We have evolved (not necessirily for the better) so that our food production methods are no longer part of the natural food chain, so we should keep out of it.
Factory farming of animals is another issue outside of this post. All I'll say is that whenever possible we try to eat free range/organically produced meat products although I'm pretty sure that some of this is just marketing hype. What do you mean by "our food production methods are no longer part of the natural food chain" - do you mean that seeing a slab of meat on the supermarket shelf is so divorced from the reality of the little baby lambs gambolling about in the fields that we don't need to think about it? I fear so, in which case it's just the kind of argument that promotes the ill-treatment of factory-farmed animals, the sort of "out of sight, out of mind" thinking that leads to feedlots stuffed to overflowing with hormone-pumped, antibiotic-laden corn-fed cattle who are so fundamentally unwell that they're only kept alive through all the drugs in their diet. OK, so I exaggerate a little, but not much. Find a copy of "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan. He follows the industrial food production cycle from the cornfields of Iowa through the feedlots in Utah to the fast-food outlet. It's eye-opening (or at least was for me) in its illustration of the politico-agro-industrial mess that the US food industry has become (and that Canada echoes, though not to the same extreme extent). I haven't hunted, but would love to. I have never yet eaten any animal I wouldn't be prepared to kill and butcher myself; I think it's important to be able to equate what's on your plate with the animal itself. The largest animal I've butchered is a sheep (I had help...) and in the UK I regularly picked up roadkill for the pot - mainly pheasants (not those I'd run over myself - that would be poaching) and rabbits. On a semantic note, because that's what I do... there's a deep-rooted linguistic issue in English that goes some way to explaining the psychological gulf between the animals and their meat, largely traceable to the Norman Conquest. The Norman nobility used French words to describe the food which the English peasantry prepared for them - from animals with Anglo-Saxon names. This is why we eat beef from cows (and veal from calves); pork from swine; venison from deer; mutton from sheep. This linguistic issue has been put forward to explain why the Anglophone world is less connected to the sources of their food than peoples of other languages. Not sure I'd go that far, but it's certainly food for thought ;) |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 7729501)
Never said they were
I have lived rurally for years Mandy, I understand the importance of culling wild deer,fox hunting etc and the benefits good Forestry Management has. Yes, more people should search out wild game etc, but at the end of the day its all about motives. Am I shooting said beast for food or to keep numbers in check, or to prove that I have a larger penis than the next man. Its a means to an end and if the hunters are just in it for the kill, or the trophy then so be it. Its a win win. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by mandymoochops
(Post 7731497)
That would be a question I would need to ask everyone that hunts. Many will have different reasons for doing it, none I would think are to manage the population. However that is the way that the population is kept to acceptable levels as dictated by the forestry commisions etc.
Its a means to an end and if the hunters are just in it for the kill, or the trophy then so be it. Its a win win. |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 7731380)
This is such complete tosh it's almost beyond funny and out the other side into serious again.
What do you mean by "our food production methods are no longer part of the natural food chain" - do you mean that seeing a slab of meat on the supermarket shelf is so divorced from the reality of the little baby lambs gambolling about in the fields that we don't need to think about it? I fear so, in which case it's just the kind of argument that promotes the ill-treatment of factory-farmed animals, the sort of "out of sight, out of mind" thinking that leads to feedlots stuffed to overflowing with hormone-pumped, antibiotic-laden corn-fed cattle who are so fundamentally unwell that they're only kept alive through all the drugs in their diet. OK, so I exaggerate a little, but not much. And as for the video clip, I feel that is probably one of the most offensive things that has ever been posted on this site. I was almost willing to recind my comment about inbred Albertans posted part in jest on another post, but not any longer. The waste of sperm with a gun may very well not be Albertan but he epitomises the rednecks that we get around here. As someone else said, high powered rifle against a bear minding its own business. I can but hope that one day the gun jams and he gets what he deserves!!! |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 7731504)
Would you encourage people to hunt horses? There are too many of them and they have to be culled, they're big targets but fast and so might be a challenge to bring down if the hunters were on horseback.
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 7731504)
Would you encourage people to hunt horses? There are too many of them and they have to be culled, they're big targets but fast and so might be a challenge to bring down if the hunters were on horseback.
That would be more acceptable than the slaughterhouses and some of the "rescue" places that they end up in (as you well know ;)) Just because its an animal I love it doesbn't mean that I am all for keeping them alive and letting them run free at all costs. The world has moved on and sad as though it sounds there aren't many natural predators for horses these days (not in the numbers that stupid breeders are churning them out at). Are there too many wild horses??? or are there too many domesticated (though granted unbroken) bred for the helluv it ones that end up in slaughterhouses sick and skinny beyond belief. Do you think that turning these out to hunt would be cruel given their state of health, not to mention their familiarity to humans hence a "hunt" would probably entail goinjg up to them with some licquorish and putting a bullet in them. Tough one - and one that would need to be looked into if it is indeed an over population of wild horses |
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by Posidrive
(Post 7731519)
Just out of interest, what is too many? Surely a point of balance will naturally be acheived, or do we have an imbalance because man has already wiped out large numbers of their natural predators?
|
Re: Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
Originally Posted by mandymoochops
(Post 7731641)
Tough one - and one that would need to be looked into if it is indeed an over population of wild horses
http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/wil...and_burro.html |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:28 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.