![]() |
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 10976768)
Didn't they pay his legal costs while he was still an mp and disallow the disputed expenses? SOP. I thought that's what happened.
|
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 10976773)
That's what Harper (belatedly) admitted. I'm talking about Nigel Wrights' affidavit to the RCMP.
|
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 10976777)
Nobody likes a rat, Harper might still come out ok. You won't be happy if my original predictions come true, will you, Novo?
Now, what were your original predictions again? Talking of rats..... |
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
& Belgium
I said Harper's probably gonna skate. |
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 10976803)
& Belgium
I said Harper's probably gonna skate. |
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
bumpity-bump-bump.
Move over Rob, Harper's back in the cross-hairs. And the beat goes on.... |
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11000477)
bumpity-bump-bump.
Move over Rob, Harper's back in the cross-hairs. And the beat goes on.... |
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 11000490)
Which means those pesky Conservatives will have to find another diversion. Maybe more dirt on Ford.
|
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11000492)
Ooh, the cynicism. :sneaky:
|
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 11000490)
Which means those pesky Conservatives will have to find another diversion. Maybe more dirt on Ford.
|
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11000616)
Grey Cup, South Korea trade deal, might be enough. In any case Wright's taking the fall like he's supposed to.
|
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11000621)
Very telling remark. And not true.
|
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11000477)
bumpity-bump-bump.
Move over Rob, Harper's back in the cross-hairs. And the beat goes on.... |
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 11000643)
What's new today - the factual account as well as the jaundiced one?
|
Re: OK. Harper's dead meat...
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11000629)
Whether or not he's convicted of anything he shields Harper who ultimately guts the senate budget or gets it well on the way to dissolution(?)gaining prestige and even if we end up with PM Scheer or LeBreton or Caballero goes out looking good. Don't cut your wrists but I think that's a very possible scenario.
Harper has been unequivocally shown to have consistently lied to Parliament (and thus to Canadians), has been unequivocally demonstrated to have presided over his Prime Minister's Office while they manipulated the Senate's report on the Deloitte audit, to have denied that he had any knowledge of the e-mail traffic that was released today, the latter being made laughable in the exchanges documented in the record of Plan A, (the illegal use of Party funds to pay off Duffy's expenses and legal costs, all of which is completely incredible (in the literal sense of completely unbelievable) given that he's a micromanaging psychopath. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:16 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.