|
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Originally Posted by ann m
(Post 10385809)
But it's already a crap haircut - what she really needs is a good stylist. Extensions maybe, some highlights, splash out a bit instead of trying to get away with a $15 crop.
She could have gone to Angles for $170 - that would have been cheaper than the lawyers fees. :sneaky: |
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 10385859)
Has that woman never seen The Breakfast Club? Instead of going to a barber she should take herself to one of these spas and get a Molly Ringwald-type princess to give her a makeover. Then it'll be a lot easier for her to find a nice man to look after her.
|
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Pls don't hold back bruv'er....I was enjoying those F-bombs :rofl:
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 10385304)
What a f**king stupid woman. She doesn't need state to intervention to find her a f**king haircut. Really, so what if they are discriminating against her for whatever bat-shit insane reason they have; if they don't want to cut her f**king hair then she should just find somebody that does. It's not ****ing difficult is it, but no lets involve f**king lawyers, cost tax payers lots of money, and try to force somebody who doesn't want to do something into doing something. Well that's called ****ing slavery I reckon.
|
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Originally Posted by Tangram
(Post 10385953)
Barber.... short hair .... I don't think she's looking for a man.
|
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
I am shocked that the female expats haven't weighed in yet to some of the Misogynistic comments?
Where are you at ladies, or do you only come out when it's to do with dress codes :confused: |
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
TBH Im glad this has happened as it will show the sometimes stoopidity that individuals or groups will go to.
What is interesting though is that its a white female making a claim that her human rights have been infringed on rather than some other minority group. As this is more to do with religion is it acceptable then for Catholic priests to refuse to perform same sex wedding ceremonies or other religious groups to do the same based on their religious beliefs. |
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Originally Posted by cheeky_monkey
(Post 10385763)
im going down to the local all women gym to use their treadmill right now.
|
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Originally Posted by ultrarunner
(Post 10386015)
I am shocked that the female expats haven't weighed in yet to some of the Misogynistic comments?
Where are you at ladies, or do you only come out when it's to do with dress codes :confused: It's a completely insignificant event and shouldn't have even hit the headlines. These days everyone's offended by the most ridiculous petty things and yes, Greenhill, let's send her to Gaza to get a better understanding of human rights. Anyone would think there aren't more important things to worry about, or spend taxpayers money on. Eeejit. |
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
(Post 10386033)
.
As this is more to do with religion is it acceptable then for Catholic priests to refuse to perform same sex wedding ceremonies or other religious groups to do the same based on their religious beliefs. |
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 10386065)
It's not ****ing acceptable, it's ****ing bigoted. Doesn't mean it should be ****ing illegal though. I really don't get why shit like this is so ****ing complicated. ****ing idiots with a sense of entitlement, think the government has to do ****ing everything for them. Boo hoo, muslim man won't cut my hair, boo hoo, preist won't marry me. ****ing cry me a river. Jeez.
|
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 10386065)
It's not ****ing acceptable, it's ****ing bigoted. Doesn't mean it should be ****ing illegal though. I really don't get why shit like this is so ****ing complicated. ****ing idiots with a sense of entitlement, think the government has to do ****ing everything for them. Boo hoo, muslim man won't cut my hair, boo hoo, preist won't marry me. ****ing cry me a river. Jeez.
|
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
She should of just bought a hat.
|
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
I always find this stuff rather interesting.
Like the women trying to get into the male only golf clubs. Men trying to get into the women only fitness centres. The (east) indians applying for jobs at the fire department that must have no facial hair for safety reasons (respirator - a no brainer) but then they win on religious grounds and have to be hired but can't do the job. But the best one by far and my favourite is the 'Pastafarian' wins religious freedom right to wear pasta strainer for driving licence http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...g-licence.html |
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
If this part of the article is true then Im signing up :lol:
Pastafarians also believe heaven has a beer volcano and a factory producing strippers. |
Re: The "oh no they didn't" thread
Isn't this the usual Daily Mail fodder of "England going to the dogs" type stuff ?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:59 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.