![]() |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by conniewalker
(Post 11655927)
:goodpost: How about ginger's too?
the whole town celebrate being gay-what happens if one isn't gay? do you just go away for the day or stay indoors? Sounds like utter nonsense :thumbdown: Always a silver, or in this case a rainbow lining to everything :ohmy: |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11655259)
Yes but there is an argument for not having marriage at all. Especially when so many divorce. Church or traditional weddings are ok, symbolic, I suppose, that includes aquariums dude, but do we really need the state to sanction a coupling? Is it just a shortcut for child, asset and tax matters?
Where's AC these days, he would have an opinion on this... And yes, especially in Ireland where same-sex civil unions have been permissible in law for a few years, the implications of this referendum are in large part connected with legal and constitutional matters, to do with taxation, inheritance, legal recognition of kinship, and all that sort of thing. For sure, there are some warm fluffy emotions flying around as well, but there are very real and practical reasons why a same-sex couple should marry rather than "just" cohabit. |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 11655894)
I get what u mean. In this instance you can't blame the gay community for advertising being gay as it was a national vote that made the headline not a gay lobby or protest.
But let's take the Gay Pride parades! That's were Toronto is closed down and the whole town celebrate being gay. When will we organise a straight lace parade or a married M-FM couple parade day, maybe a midget or short people under 5'5 parade/celebration ? Oh err we don't need them as its, well it's just not trendy to do so !!
Originally Posted by conniewalker
(Post 11655927)
:goodpost: How about ginger's too?
the whole town celebrate being gay-what happens if one isn't gay? do you just go away for the day or stay indoors? Sounds like utter nonsense :thumbdown: Most folk who march in Pride parades are from the "LGBT community" (I hate that expression - it's virtually meaningless). But some marchers, and a large number of watchers and supporters, are not - they are expressing solidarity and support with people's right to exercise their freedom to be who they are, and not to have to repress their sexuality for fear of persecution or ridicule. Attitudes like yours are the reason the rest of society makes such a big thing of Pride - to show that we are not all narrow-minded or bigoted about others' sexual preferences. If you stopped making fun of it, perhaps there wouldn't need to be a Pride parade at all? |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 11655930)
It's more than one day now it's a whole week. I have gone last two years in a row and I am scheduled to go this year. I get paid to go as I am busy filming badly injured RTA gay people who find the energy to get out and walk the parade or stand and watch for hours on end lol.
Always a silver, or in this case a rainbow lining to everything :ohmy: |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 11655943)
That's conflating two very different things. For sure, it is perfectly sound to hold a position that all marriage is outdated, that the whole institution of marriage should be abolished. But while it is still in existence, its limitation by sexual preference is a much harder opinion to justify.
And yes, especially in Ireland where same-sex civil unions have been permissible in law for a few years, the implications of this referendum are in large part connected with legal and constitutional matters, to do with taxation, inheritance, legal recognition of kinship, and all that sort of thing. For sure, there are some warm fluffy emotions flying around as well, but there are very real and practical reasons why a same-sex couple should marry rather than "just" cohabit. |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 11655947)
You two are hilarious - not.
Most folk who march in Pride parades are from the "LGBT community" (I hate that expression - it's virtually meaningless). But some marchers, and a large number of watchers and supporters, are not - they are expressing solidarity and support with people's right to exercise their freedom to be who they are, and not to have to repress their sexuality for fear of persecution or ridicule. Attitudes like yours are the reason the rest of society makes such a big thing of Pride - to show that we are not all narrow-minded or bigoted about others' sexual preferences. If you stopped making fun of it, perhaps there wouldn't need to be a Pride parade at all? |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by conniewalker
(Post 11655953)
Nobody's "making fun" of anything! It would have been helpful if you'd read all my previous posts on this thread, you would then see that I don't deserve to be labelled as bigoted or narrow-minded.
Otherwise, what you have posted on this thread seem to be expressions of yoru own boredom, or gentle barbed comments towards other posters. It's hard to tell what you really think, except that you stuck a "good post" comment on one of Magnum's comments that I thought was not a good post at all. But, of course, we are all entitled to our own opinions, which is rather the point.;) |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11655951)
I'm conflating things now? I did start this thread...
|
Re: Ireland votes Yes
The "how about gingers too" comment was meant to be tongue-in-cheek as it's an old joke that's been around for a long time and I really can't imagine anyone being offended by it.
The comment about making a fuss isn't narrow-minded at all nor is it belittling. Perhaps I should not have used the word fuss but I'm sure someone will be along soon to point out my failings ;) |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 11655963)
Sorry, that wasn't meant to be having a go at you. I just think arguments about the existence of marriage at all, as an institution, are a very different debate from the restriction of marriage to only one group of people. I do appreciate that, in the first post on this thread, you congratulated the Irish for their referendum result. No slight on your pro-free-choice-in-sexual-partner stance was intended ;)
Did I say post enough in that post ? |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 11655963)
Sorry, that wasn't meant to be having a go at you. I just think arguments about the existence of marriage at all, as an institution, are a very different debate from the restriction of marriage to only one group of people. I do appreciate that, in the first post on this thread, you congratulated the Irish for their referendum result. No slight on your pro-free-choice-in-sexual-partner stance was intended ;)
|
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 11655969)
You see this is the diferance between your posts and other posters posts. (Except for this post I am posting now) is that you post about how other people's views are the wrong bigoted and not towing the line posts and others, like me, Shard and Connie just post about the subject matter and give their point own views. Leaving us open to ridicule. :huh:
Did I say post enough in that post ?
|
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by conniewalker
(Post 11655968)
The "how about gingers too" comment was meant to be tongue-in-cheek as it's an old joke that's been around for a long time and I really can't imagine anyone being offended by it.
The comment about making a fuss isn't narrow-minded at all nor is it belittling. Perhaps I should not have used the word fuss but I'm sure someone will be along soon to point out my failings ;) |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by conniewalker
(Post 11655883)
No, I wouldn't dream of doing that. A person's sexual preferences ought to be private and it would be blatantly obvious if I raised the matter that I had thought about their sexual lives and formed an opinion of them based on what I surmised-be that prejudiced or not or "I don't give a hoot" opinion.
In truth I don't care who marries who-even cousins. What irks me is the fuss made. |
Re: Ireland votes Yes
Originally Posted by conniewalker
(Post 11655968)
The "how about gingers too" comment was meant to be tongue-in-cheek as it's an old joke that's been around for a long time and I really can't imagine anyone being offended by it.
The comment about making a fuss isn't narrow-minded at all nor is it belittling. Perhaps I should not have used the word fuss but I'm sure someone will be along soon to point out my failings ;) How do you feel about bridal departments, Anne Summers, Victoria's Secret, inebriated women wandering around town with 'L' plates on? Are these shouting from the rooftops? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:57 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.