British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they? (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/ground-zero-mosque-should-they-shouldnt-they-681149/)

Oink Sep 9th 2010 10:41 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Auld Yin (Post 8832743)
I must have missed it when catholics (sic) suddenly became no longer Cristian (sic).

Aren't Christian's of all the major churches technically catholics? As opposed to the appropriation of term by the Church of Rome?

dakota44 Sep 9th 2010 10:49 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 
Good old American tolerance at work. Arseholes.

http://gawker.com/5628631/mosque-pro...iles-at-park51

John_B Sep 9th 2010 11:40 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8837554)
Have you been in Canada long? ;)

Nearly 6 years.

Rete Sep 9th 2010 1:08 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8837571)
Aren't Christian's of all the major churches technically catholics? As opposed to the appropriation of term by the Church of Rome?


Definitely not. I'm Christian but not a Catholic. There is no such thing as technically Catholic unless you are referring to Catholics who practice their religion only on Sundays and major Christian holidays.

Auld Yin Sep 9th 2010 1:24 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8837571)
Aren't Christian's of all the major churches technically catholics? As opposed to the appropriation of term by the Church of Rome?

The poster I quoted suggested that Catholics were not Christian when he rolled them in with "Jews, Buddhists and so on".

Auld Yin Sep 9th 2010 1:47 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Rete (Post 8837890)
Definitely not. I'm Christian but not a Catholic. There is no such thing as technically Catholic unless you are referring to Catholics who practice their religion only on Sundays and major Christian holidays.

The Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Anglicans, Lutherans and some Methodists believe that their churches are catholic in the sense that they are in continuity with the original universal church founded by the Apostles. The Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox churches all believe that their church is the only original and universal church. In "Catholic Christendom" (including the Anglican Communion), bishops are considered the highest order of ministers within the Christian religion, as shepherds of unity in communion with the whole church and one another.[8] Catholicity is considered one of Four Marks of the Church, the others being unity, sanctity, and apostolicity.[9] according to the Nicene Creed of 381: "I believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church."

Source:- Wikipedia

snowbunny Sep 9th 2010 2:49 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Auld Yin (Post 8837912)
The poster I quoted suggested that Catholics were not Christian when he rolled them in with "Jews, Buddhists and so on".

Some fundamentalist Christians believe Catholicism and Mormonism are cults.... based upon veneration of figures like Mary and Joseph Smith on a near-equal level with Jesus.

I was raised fundie and was taught which faiths were "very questionable." :o

Now the guy-who-was-going-to-burn-the-Quran is going to have a go at getting the mosque moved. Everyone wants a piece of this action.

dakota44 Sep 9th 2010 3:50 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by snowbunny (Post 8837996)
Some fundamentalist Christians believe Catholicism and Mormonism are cults.... based upon veneration of figures like Mary and Joseph Smith on a near-equal level with Jesus.

I was raised fundie and was taught which faiths were "very questionable." :o

Now the guy-who-was-going-to-burn-the-Quran is going to have a go at getting the mosque moved. Everyone wants a piece of this action.

Christians are, basically, in violation of the first two commandments which makes them idol worshipers.


1. You shall have no other gods before me. (Jesus is venerated as a virtual God and his name is spoken more in church than Gods)

2. You shall not make for yourself any carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments. (Well, there goes Jesus on the cross above so many alters. Not to mention the statues of Mary, Jesus, the Stations of The Cross, all the Saints of the Catholic Church, the Nativity Scene, religious medals etc.)

I don't think Baptists and some other branches of Christianity use depictions of Jesus etc. They assume this absolves them, but they all have that crucifix and basically worship it. Same same. So they're all going to hell anyway.:lol:

snowbunny Sep 9th 2010 4:15 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by dakota44 (Post 8838080)
(Well, there goes Jesus on the cross above so many alters. Not to mention the statues of Mary, Jesus, the Stations of The Cross, all the Saints of the Catholic Church, the Nativity Scene, religious medals etc.)

I don't think Baptists and some other branches of Christianity use depictions of Jesus etc. They assume this absolves them, but they all have that crucifix and basically worship it. Same same. So they're all going to hell anyway.:lol:

Ehm - there's a difference between veneration and acknowledgment. I honestly do not think that the more fundamental faiths (as you've pointed out, Baptists) worship objects of any kind. Also - the 10 commandments are in the Old Testament, and while Jesus did not null and void them, he mentioned that only two commandments are imperative (The Great Commandment). If I have one criticism to make of modern Christians, it is they ignore the second part of the Great Commandment, which is called the moral imperative ("love thy neighbour) and yet some self-styled right-wing Christians are the first to cut welfare programs. I'm sure the counterargument would be that the *government* should not force people to do this, but that's also puzzling given that they certainly want the government to *prohibit* things like drinking, drugs, prostitution, gay marriage, and so on. And they want to crow that America was founded on "Judeo-Christian principles" (by the way, Jews hate that phrase) so if that's the case, then what's the problem with the government implementing some of those principles?

dakota44 Sep 9th 2010 4:32 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by snowbunny (Post 8838121)
Ehm - there's a difference between veneration and acknowledgment. I honestly do not think that the more fundamental faiths (as you've pointed out, Baptists) worship objects of any kind. Also - the 10 commandments are in the Old Testament, and while Jesus did not null and void them, he mentioned that only two commandments are imperative (The Great Commandment). If I have one criticism to make of modern Christians, it is they ignore the second part of the Great Commandment, which is called the moral imperative ("love thy neighbour) and yet some self-styled right-wing Christians are the first to cut welfare programs. I'm sure the counterargument would be that the *government* should not force people to do this, but that's also puzzling given that they certainly want the government to *prohibit* things like drinking, drugs, prostitution, gay marriage, and so on. And they want to crow that America was founded on "Judeo-Christian principles" (by the way, Jews hate that phrase) so if that's the case, then what's the problem with the government implementing some of those principles?

Of course Jesus (or his creators) would tell folks not to worry about those first two commandments. If they did, they wouldn't follow Jesus.;) And you are correct. Most Christians, or too many of them, forget what should be the true meaning of the faith.

snowbunny Sep 9th 2010 4:44 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by dakota44 (Post 8838134)
Of course Jesus (or his creators) would tell folks not to worry about those first two commandments. If they did, they wouldn't follow Jesus.;) And you are correct. Most Christians, or too many of them, forget what should be the true meaning of the faith.

Especially the part about a camel, a needle, a rich man and heaven. ;)

dakota44 Sep 9th 2010 5:07 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by snowbunny (Post 8838145)
Especially the part about a camel, a needle, a rich man and heaven. ;)

Yes, that one gets overlooked a lot. Easier for a camel to pass through th eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the gates of heaven.

iaink Sep 10th 2010 1:17 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 
Of course, the "eye of a needle" did mean something different then, so not quite so lidicrous, and there is always some argument over literal interpretation vs metaphore etc, and none of this has anything to do with the (not a) mosque (two blocks and a bit from being) at ground zero anyway.


Im sure the koran burning nutter will be sucessful in stopping them building a mosque at ground zero, as it never was a mosque, and never was going to be at ground zero in the first place:rolleyes:

Souvy Sep 10th 2010 2:13 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 
Anyone else picked up on the irony regarding what this tit calls his church?

Dove World Outreach Center.

ireland2canada Sep 10th 2010 2:15 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Souvy (Post 8839142)
Anyone else picked up on the irony regarding what this tit calls his church?

Dove World Outreach Centre.

Better?

Souvy Sep 10th 2010 2:18 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by ireland2canada (Post 8839156)
Better?

Marginally better, now that you have converted it to proper English. The name, however, remains wank.

Oink Sep 10th 2010 6:33 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Rete (Post 8837890)
Definitely not. I'm Christian but not a Catholic. There is no such thing as technically Catholic unless you are referring to Catholics who practice their religion only on Sundays and major Christian holidays.

I like your impassioned denial. But you're wrong. You might not be Roman catholic but if you're a Christian of a major church then you're a catholic.

DaveLovesDee Sep 10th 2010 4:21 pm

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Oink (Post 8839662)
I like your impassioned denial. But you're wrong. You might not be Roman catholic but if you're a Christian of a major church then you're a catholic.

If you're praying to be rescued from a coal shaft in Chile, you're a miner Catholic! :p

Yasmina2005 Sep 16th 2010 9:43 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Oakvillian (Post 8780872)
Why, if the Muslim site developers really are as peace-loving and reconciliatory as they claim, can't they build a multi-faith centre with a church and a Synagogue in the same building.

Actually I read somewhere that what it is intended to be built is a big interfaith center representing the 3 main religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam...

I do not know if this is true!

Yasmina2005 Sep 16th 2010 9:46 am

Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
 

Originally Posted by Lady Locket (Post 8781041)
You know, this whole thing is a media frenzy blown out of all proportion. The site for the new mosque, to replace a temporary one in the area, is NOT ON GROUND ZERO - it is actually two blocks away. There is a heck of a lot of buildings, (commercial, residential, political and several Starbucks), in between the Ground Zero and this new Mosque. It is also not a traditional mosque, but more of an education and study centre - something I think people need.



What have we learnt folks? Never trust the media - verify the facts for yourself! :frown:

Exactly....

I saw in the Daily Show of John Stewart the map and it reflects what you said...The site is far from Ground Zero..


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:10 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.