Wikiposts

Earthquakes

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 7:29 am
  #16  
slanderer of the innocent
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
ExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

I"m freaked enough to be ordering a kit today
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 7:38 am
  #17  
printer's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,514
From: Kelowna
printer has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond reputeprinter has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

so to all those people that have said Kelowna is a bit far from any major cities and the coast. Have you changed your mind now?
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 8:10 am
  #18  
mandymoochops's Avatar
Sawdust making harpy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11,291
From: Alberta
mandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Living in the prairies really does have it's advantages.
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 8:12 am
  #19  
Oink's Avatar
.
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 20,188
Oink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Originally Posted by mandymoochops
Living in the prairies really does have it's advantages.
Trust me, its a risk worth taking.
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 8:26 am
  #20  
Jingsamichty's Avatar
Lowering the tone
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,154
From: Here and there
Jingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond reputeJingsamichty has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

The oysters are better in the prairies.
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 8:46 am
  #21  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227
Alan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
The oysters are better in the prairies.
Before I knew better I initially thought that prairie oyster was slang for snatch.
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 9:09 am
  #22  
Binned by Muderators
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,708
From: White Rock BC
JonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond reputeJonboyE has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

"The big one" is due here sometime between now and the next 500 years. I have about 25 years left so I quite fancy my chances of avoiding it.
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 9:24 am
  #23  
slanderer of the innocent
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
ExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

TO all the smug people...Australians didn't think they'd get an earthquake, yet Newcastle had one. Christchurch was never supposed to get the big one...the fault line was unknown before Sept last year.
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 9:41 am
  #24  
jimf's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,448
From: Calgary
jimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Originally Posted by JonboyE
"The big one" is due here sometime between now and the next 500 years. I have about 25 years left so I quite fancy my chances of avoiding it.
37% of a 9+ event in the next 50 years.

Recent findings concluded the Cascadia subduction zone was more hazardous than previously suggested. The feared next major earthquake has some geologists predicting a 10 to 14% probability that the Cascadia Subduction Zone will produce an event of magnitude 9 or higher in the next 50 years,[9] although the most recent studies suggest that this risk could be as high as 37%.[10][11] Geologists have also determined the Pacific Northwest is not prepared for such a colossal earthquake. The tsunami produced may reach heights of approximately 30 meters (100 ft).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_subduction_zone
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 9:50 am
  #25  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227
Alan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond reputeAlan2005 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Originally Posted by JonboyE
"The big one" is due here sometime between now and the next 500 years. I have about 25 years left so I quite fancy my chances of avoiding it.
I've still made sure I've got earthquake cover with my home insurance.
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 10:14 am
  #26  
slanderer of the innocent
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
ExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Originally Posted by jimf
37% of a 9+ event in the next 50 years.

Recent findings concluded the Cascadia subduction zone was more hazardous than previously suggested. The feared next major earthquake has some geologists predicting a 10 to 14% probability that the Cascadia Subduction Zone will produce an event of magnitude 9 or higher in the next 50 years,[9] although the most recent studies suggest that this risk could be as high as 37%.[10][11] Geologists have also determined the Pacific Northwest is not prepared for such a colossal earthquake. The tsunami produced may reach heights of approximately 30 meters (100 ft).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_subduction_zone

And they have been saying the same thing about WEllington for years yet Christchurch got it which no one saw coming.
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 10:32 am
  #27  
jimf's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,448
From: Calgary
jimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond reputejimf has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Originally Posted by Kiwilass
And they have been saying the same thing about WEllington for years yet Christchurch got it which no one saw coming.
http://geology.about.com/library/bl/...ustralesia.htm

Looking at this most of New Zealand is high/very high risk with a small area moderate. Is that where Christchurch is?
 
Old Mar 11th 2011 | 6:21 pm
  #28  
The4BellsLondon's Avatar
half a century
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,222
From: Sarf Lundun to East Van :)
The4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond reputeThe4BellsLondon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Originally Posted by Kiwilass
I"m freaked enough to be ordering a kit today
YOu have? bloody hell I'd better get one 0 they sell em at the IGA for $40 a person!
 
Old Mar 12th 2011 | 3:55 am
  #29  
el_richo's Avatar
Beep
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,311
From: Here
el_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
YOu have? bloody hell I'd better get one 0 they sell em at the IGA for $40 a person!
$40? Sweet Jesus!!

I'm out his way today so i'm going to gradually move my stuff into Alan2005's basement/dungeon

Don't tell him though............
 
Old Mar 12th 2011 | 6:29 am
  #30  
james.mc's Avatar
All Sooked up!
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,895
From: Sooke, BC.
james.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond reputejames.mc has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Earthquakes

Originally Posted by jimf
.....Geologists have also determined the Pacific Northwest is not prepared for such a colossal earthquake. The tsunami produced may reach heights of approximately 30 meters (100 ft).[/I]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_subduction_zone....
Note to self.

Buy property on high ground
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.