![]() |
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
I recognise his talent but I was never much of a fan.
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11930459)
I recognise his talent but I was never much of a fan.
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11930466)
Ditto. I only recognize two of his songs. We lived in the US for 18 years and hardly heard anything about him. Very surprised that for the last two days the news networks have hardly broadcast anything else.
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11930466)
Ditto. I only recognize two of his songs. We lived in the US for 18 years and hardly heard anything about him. Very surprised that for the last two days the news networks have hardly broadcast anything else.
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 11930489)
It's the damn Princess Diana effect....
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by moneypenny20
(Post 11930489)
It's the damn Princess Diana effect. Now the entire world has to mourn someone regardless of how important they were to their lives.
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
There's also a news/media led agenda that whips up hysteria. News has become entertainment. However, as that BBC article pointed out, there will be plenty of clog popping over the next decade, do maybe the media will have to tone things down or risk fatiguing audiences.
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11930618)
...However, as that BBC article pointed out, there will be plenty of clog popping over the next decade...
More people famous (albeit seemingly a looser measure of fame these days, perhaps) more famous people dying would account for a gradual increase rather than the dramatic one. Not only that, many of those this year have been much younger than usual. Of course, if there are more celebs, then even with the same proportion of early deaths there will be more early deaths to report. But the question of why so many this year isn't answered by "just more celebs" point. |
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11930782)
But the question of why so many this year isn't answered by "just more celebs" point.
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11930782)
But the question of why so many this year isn't answered by "just more celebs" point.
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by DaveLovesDee
(Post 11930792)
Could it have anyting to do with the lifestyle many led. The 60's and 70's were quite different in that respect.
What has prompted the topic - not here but in other media - is how the total this year (much more) has compared to last year, the year before...that sort of thing. Unless someone is practising voodoo or something, coincidence - a freak - is a likely explanation. |
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Here's another baby boomer celeb death. I hadn't heard of this person but some of you may have:
Papa Wemba, Congo music star, dies after stage collapse - BBC News S |
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
Originally Posted by Snowy560
(Post 11931163)
Here's another baby boomer celeb death. I hadn't heard of this person but some of you may have:
Papa Wemba, Congo music star, dies after stage collapse - BBC News S |
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
|
Re: Celebrity Croakers 2016
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:49 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.