Canada and Quebec? and the future
#46
Ah, now we're getting somewhere on Mr D. The longer lyrics are intriguing. Will have to explore further.
Last edited by Shard; Mar 6th 2014 at 9:07 am.
#47
BE Forum Addict








Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,787
From: Qc, Canada











Canada and Quebec?
Presuming that nobody who chooses Canada to be his/her new home, nobody is interested in any independence debates of Quebec?
Will there be a 3rd referendum?
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/...ty-crisis-3-0/
Presuming that nobody who chooses Canada to be his/her new home, nobody is interested in any independence debates of Quebec?
Will there be a 3rd referendum?
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/...ty-crisis-3-0/
,"The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind ..."

SB - (accidental Quebecoise by adoption)
#50
Quebec as a part founder of Canada at 1867, the Federation, is part and parcel of the Constitution itself.
I will grant you that, yes, by the 1982 round, there were political abstentions, including surrounding the non-adoption of the Charter, the same imbedded in the 1982 Constitution Act.
I will grant you that, yes, by the 1982 round, there were political abstentions, including surrounding the non-adoption of the Charter, the same imbedded in the 1982 Constitution Act.
#51
BE Forum Addict








Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,124











http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/...969/story.html
#52
what you refer to is the latest piece of nonsense from the separatists, not to be confused with the constitution of canada
http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/...969/story.html
http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/...969/story.html
The Constitution of Canada;
The 1982 Constitution Act;
The Canadian Charter of Rights; and
Quebec's Charter
Although its apparently all Poutin to some.
#54
Now, the man on the stand he wants my vote
He's a-runnin' for office on the ballot note
He's out there preachin' in front of the steeple
Tellin' me he loves all kinds-a people
(He's eatin' bagels
He's eatin' pizza
He's eatin' chitlins).
He's a-runnin' for office on the ballot note
He's out there preachin' in front of the steeple
Tellin' me he loves all kinds-a people
(He's eatin' bagels
He's eatin' pizza
He's eatin' chitlins).
#55
Thread Starter
Forum Regular



Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 181
From: Toronto




I am actually not very happy about Pauline and her political rhetoric, and let's hope it's just blindness rhetoric. Everything good will stay in Quebec, anything bad will go to the rest of Canada.
She seems to think that Quebec won't have any borders or tolls, however the rest of Canada could impose just that. And what about all these Canadian federal jobs in Quebec? Does she think they'll stay there once Quebec gets independent? Same as immigration! In the event of Quebec getting independence, anybody from Quebec would quite possibly be subject to Canadian Immigration legislation, like any other immigrant wanting to settle in Canada.
If Quebec would actually be a new country one day, how much "land" would she get? Would it be only about the southern third of Quebec that was part of "New France" and later on became the British Province of Quebec at the Treaty of Paris in 1763? Back then, the French didn't own land up north of that and the area around Hudson's Bay was "Rupert's land" and was actually a British territory back then.
After the "Treaty of Paris" which was in 1763, "New France" became British territory, the British Province of Quebec and the Crown's land now the Canadian Crown's land. Can French speaking Quebec separatists take land that doesn't belong to them but belongs to Canada and the Crown?
Who exactly would actually keep the land, like national parks and Indian reserves? As far as I know, in Quebec this land is under the jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government (the big Crown) according to the Canadian Constitution?
Next time, please your brain and try to think, Pauline.
She seems to think that Quebec won't have any borders or tolls, however the rest of Canada could impose just that. And what about all these Canadian federal jobs in Quebec? Does she think they'll stay there once Quebec gets independent? Same as immigration! In the event of Quebec getting independence, anybody from Quebec would quite possibly be subject to Canadian Immigration legislation, like any other immigrant wanting to settle in Canada.
If Quebec would actually be a new country one day, how much "land" would she get? Would it be only about the southern third of Quebec that was part of "New France" and later on became the British Province of Quebec at the Treaty of Paris in 1763? Back then, the French didn't own land up north of that and the area around Hudson's Bay was "Rupert's land" and was actually a British territory back then.
After the "Treaty of Paris" which was in 1763, "New France" became British territory, the British Province of Quebec and the Crown's land now the Canadian Crown's land. Can French speaking Quebec separatists take land that doesn't belong to them but belongs to Canada and the Crown?
Who exactly would actually keep the land, like national parks and Indian reserves? As far as I know, in Quebec this land is under the jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government (the big Crown) according to the Canadian Constitution?
Next time, please your brain and try to think, Pauline.
#56
I am actually not very happy about Pauline and her political rhetoric, and let's hope it's just blindness rhetoric. Everything good will stay in Quebec, anything bad will go to the rest of Canada.
She seems to think that Quebec won't have any borders or tolls, however the rest of Canada could impose just that. And what about all these Canadian federal jobs in Quebec? Does she think they'll stay there once Quebec gets independent? Same as immigration! In the event of Quebec getting independence, anybody from Quebec would quite possibly be subject to Canadian Immigration legislation, like any other immigrant wanting to settle in Canada.
If Quebec would actually be a new country one day, how much "land" would she get? Would it be only about the southern third of Quebec that was part of "New France" and later on became the British Province of Quebec at the Treaty of Paris in 1763? Back then, the French didn't own land up north of that and the area around Hudson's Bay was "Rupert's land" and was actually a British territory back then.
After the "Treaty of Paris" which was in 1763, "New France" became British territory, the British Province of Quebec and the Crown's land now the Canadian Crown's land. Can French speaking Quebec separatists take land that doesn't belong to them but belongs to Canada and the Crown?
Who exactly would actually keep the land, like national parks and Indian reserves? As far as I know, in Quebec this land is under the jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government (the big Crown) according to the Canadian Constitution?
Next time, please your brain and try to think, Pauline.
She seems to think that Quebec won't have any borders or tolls, however the rest of Canada could impose just that. And what about all these Canadian federal jobs in Quebec? Does she think they'll stay there once Quebec gets independent? Same as immigration! In the event of Quebec getting independence, anybody from Quebec would quite possibly be subject to Canadian Immigration legislation, like any other immigrant wanting to settle in Canada.
If Quebec would actually be a new country one day, how much "land" would she get? Would it be only about the southern third of Quebec that was part of "New France" and later on became the British Province of Quebec at the Treaty of Paris in 1763? Back then, the French didn't own land up north of that and the area around Hudson's Bay was "Rupert's land" and was actually a British territory back then.
After the "Treaty of Paris" which was in 1763, "New France" became British territory, the British Province of Quebec and the Crown's land now the Canadian Crown's land. Can French speaking Quebec separatists take land that doesn't belong to them but belongs to Canada and the Crown?
Who exactly would actually keep the land, like national parks and Indian reserves? As far as I know, in Quebec this land is under the jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government (the big Crown) according to the Canadian Constitution?
Next time, please your brain and try to think, Pauline.
#57
Who would go to war against the First Nations in Quebec to try and take their land? The reserves along the US border could probably beat the SQ by themselves right now if they had to.
#58
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,009











I am actually not very happy about Pauline and her political rhetoric, and let's hope it's just blindness rhetoric. Everything good will stay in Quebec, anything bad will go to the rest of Canada.
She seems to think that Quebec won't have any borders or tolls, however the rest of Canada could impose just that. And what about all these Canadian federal jobs in Quebec? Does she think they'll stay there once Quebec gets independent? Same as immigration! In the event of Quebec getting independence, anybody from Quebec would quite possibly be subject to Canadian Immigration legislation, like any other immigrant wanting to settle in Canada.
If Quebec would actually be a new country one day, how much "land" would she get? Would it be only about the southern third of Quebec that was part of "New France" and later on became the British Province of Quebec at the Treaty of Paris in 1763? Back then, the French didn't own land up north of that and the area around Hudson's Bay was "Rupert's land" and was actually a British territory back then.
After the "Treaty of Paris" which was in 1763, "New France" became British territory, the British Province of Quebec and the Crown's land now the Canadian Crown's land. Can French speaking Quebec separatists take land that doesn't belong to them but belongs to Canada and the Crown?
Who exactly would actually keep the land, like national parks and Indian reserves? As far as I know, in Quebec this land is under the jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government (the big Crown) according to the Canadian Constitution?
Next time, please your brain and try to think, Pauline.
She seems to think that Quebec won't have any borders or tolls, however the rest of Canada could impose just that. And what about all these Canadian federal jobs in Quebec? Does she think they'll stay there once Quebec gets independent? Same as immigration! In the event of Quebec getting independence, anybody from Quebec would quite possibly be subject to Canadian Immigration legislation, like any other immigrant wanting to settle in Canada.
If Quebec would actually be a new country one day, how much "land" would she get? Would it be only about the southern third of Quebec that was part of "New France" and later on became the British Province of Quebec at the Treaty of Paris in 1763? Back then, the French didn't own land up north of that and the area around Hudson's Bay was "Rupert's land" and was actually a British territory back then.
After the "Treaty of Paris" which was in 1763, "New France" became British territory, the British Province of Quebec and the Crown's land now the Canadian Crown's land. Can French speaking Quebec separatists take land that doesn't belong to them but belongs to Canada and the Crown?
Who exactly would actually keep the land, like national parks and Indian reserves? As far as I know, in Quebec this land is under the jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government (the big Crown) according to the Canadian Constitution?
Next time, please your brain and try to think, Pauline.
And the natives in Quebec always say they wish to remain part of Canada if Quebec goes so how does that get dealt with?
#59
Slob










Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,345
From: Ottineau











The last time the natives got really stroppy, it took more than the SQ to sort it out. Try Googling Oka Crisis.
#60
Don't have to; it's still fresh in my mind. One arms cache the police discovered contained LAWS rockets. They were totally justified in shutting down the mayor's plan to put in another nine holes of golf course on top of their graveyard, afaic. There were rallies in support and rotating highway and rail barricades all across the country.



