Bikers
#62
I'm not sure. But the "Harley culture" is pretty exclusively North American. Sure, there are bikers elsewhere in the west, but nothing like the Harley bikers here - the shiners, polishers, only ride on sunny Sundays, the accessorizing, the costumes... it's uniquely North American.
These bikes are expensive! Not many British guys that I know will drop $20-30k on a bit of kit they only use for a few hours a week at most.
These bikes are expensive! Not many British guys that I know will drop $20-30k on a bit of kit they only use for a few hours a week at most.
Another point which has not been mentioned yet is that Harley's are increasingly popular with women (of a certain age) too. It does all seem to revolve around a social and recaptured youth theme.
#63
Think you are reading way too much into what is essentially a hobby. Generally speaking the cost of big boys toys is much lower in NA than Europe. Disposable income is higher, storage not usually an issue, places to use or congregate not an issue at all.
Another point which has not been mentioned yet is that Harley's are increasingly popular with women (of a certain age) too. It does all seem to revolve around a social and recaptured youth theme.
Another point which has not been mentioned yet is that Harley's are increasingly popular with women (of a certain age) too. It does all seem to revolve around a social and recaptured youth theme.
#64
One thing I notice on this board, is that there are certain posters, many of whom would like to think of themselves as "cultured" and "intelligent" that immediately resort to name calling when describing things/people that are different to the things/people that they own or with whom they associate.
I don't own or ride a Harley and I have no interest in debating why those that do own or ride Harleys do. I have noticed that there are Harleys that have very loud exhausts and those that have exhausts that are not so loud. But, I believe, grouping them all as "wankers" describes the maker of such an assertion far better than those being described.
I don't own or ride a Harley and I have no interest in debating why those that do own or ride Harleys do. I have noticed that there are Harleys that have very loud exhausts and those that have exhausts that are not so loud. But, I believe, grouping them all as "wankers" describes the maker of such an assertion far better than those being described.
Last edited by Almost Canadian; Mar 6th 2013 at 7:39 am.
#65
In my experience, Harley riders tend to be middle-aged weekend heroes.
Harleys are not cheap, and the accessorizing is just as expensive. It is a hobby, perhaps a harmless enough hobby to those that can afford it, but it is primarily about being 'in a club' with likeminded people.
Imagine if the Harley riders were all teenagers, blipping the throttle and shaking everyone's windows. The only reason people DON'T complain about the ridiculous noise of middle-aged motorcyclists is because it's usually only them that complain about anything in the first place.
Harleys are not cheap, and the accessorizing is just as expensive. It is a hobby, perhaps a harmless enough hobby to those that can afford it, but it is primarily about being 'in a club' with likeminded people.
Imagine if the Harley riders were all teenagers, blipping the throttle and shaking everyone's windows. The only reason people DON'T complain about the ridiculous noise of middle-aged motorcyclists is because it's usually only them that complain about anything in the first place.
#66
One thing I notice on this board, is that there are certain posters, many of whom would like to think of themselves as "cultured" and "intelligent" that immediately resort to name calling when describing things/people that are different to the things/people that they own or with whom they associate.
#67
One thing I notice on this board, is that there are certain posters, many of whom would like to think of themselves as "cultured" and "intelligent" that immediately resort to name calling when describing things/people that are different to the things/people that they own or with whom they associate.
I don't own or ride a Harley and I have no interest in debating why those that do own or ride Harleys do. I have noticed that there are Harleys that have very loud exhausts and those that have exhausts that are not so loud. But, I believe, grouping them all as "wankers" describes the maker of such an assertion far better than those being described.
I don't own or ride a Harley and I have no interest in debating why those that do own or ride Harleys do. I have noticed that there are Harleys that have very loud exhausts and those that have exhausts that are not so loud. But, I believe, grouping them all as "wankers" describes the maker of such an assertion far better than those being described.
Last edited by Oink; Mar 6th 2013 at 8:06 am.
#68
So it's pretty much the same as calling people who own (or have owned) open-top sports cars "hairdressers"?
This is a general rather than an individual observation based on theoretical sampling and is justifiable within qualitative research. A theory developed within a case study may be exported to another whilst providing explanatory theory about other individuals who are in comparable situations. As opposed to an unsophisticated indirect personal attack.







