![]() |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
(Post 5292077)
ave canadian per annum £5000 4 year course Sorry: $5000, batty? |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 5292092)
$5000, shirley?
Sorry: $5000, batty? |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
(Post 5292086)
Its just plain resentment, no logic. The same resentment that makes people key a quality car ...
|
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 5292102)
Someone keyed a brand new car of mine a few years ago. I was very flattered. "Quality status at last", I thought to myself. It was a Mazda Protege.
|
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
(Post 5292104)
here or there?
I'm wondering if welfare recipients should be allowed to have trafficators on their cars, or if we should insist on the use of hand signals to demonstrate their lowly status? Perhaps it would also help if we insisted that private plates must include the letters "BUM"? |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 5292134)
Oh, here. I could never afford a new one there.
I'm wondering if welfare recipients should be allowed to have trafficators on their cars, or if we should insist on the use of hand signals to demonstrate their lowly status? Perhaps it would also help if we insisted that private plates must include the letters "BUM"? |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
(Post 5292086)
Its just plain resentment, no logic. The same resentment that makes people key a quality car or trash a nice house. Just think how mad he would be if she had a multichanger CD and AC and ipod ready. Dont even think about GPS, or else they will be foaming
Your right I do resent it why should all my money be earned and the majority of hers be benefits? I just don't think its right I have two children shouldn't I get the same if thats the case. Although I have never keyed anybody's car or trashed anybody's house!! |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by mclauchlan35
(Post 5292197)
Maybe we care because were still here paying for it, she is paying in about under £2k a year tax and getting £12k back. Putting little in and taking plenty out.
Your right I do resent it why should all my money be earned and the majority of hers be benefits? I just don't think its right I have two children shouldn't I get the same if thats the case. Although I have never keyed anybody's car or trashed anybody's house!! Why dont you see if you are eligible for the working tax credit thing?? |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
(Post 5292255)
Thats socialism for you, bring back the workhouse and send those kids up a chimney. That'll teach em.
Why dont you see if you are eligible for the working tax credit thing?? I have been in other houses where there is less income and less benefit. |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by mclauchlan35
(Post 5292197)
Maybe we care because were still here paying for it, she is paying in about under £2k a year tax and getting £12k back. Putting little in and taking plenty out.
Your right I do resent it why should all my money be earned and the majority of hers be benefits? I just don't think its right I have two children shouldn't I get the same if thats the case. Modern poppycock. |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by mclauchlan35
(Post 5292260)
It cuts off after a certain amount, we don't get anything, although not sure if they check, I don't think this person is claiming all the income coming into which is why she is getting so much.
I have been in other houses where there is less income and less benefit. Did you do the online check?? it may not be as low a cut off as you think. If it really bugs you then shop her. |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
(Post 5292307)
If it really bugs you then shop her.
|
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 5292365)
Wot? Is there no ethics in England no more? You don't grass no one, never.
But if the OP has evidence that this woman is fraudelent then its a crime. Do you report the man who you know burgled the house next door?? Todays moral conundrum, please discuss! |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
I've lept quiet on this thread up to now, then I watched on the news that the government are going to pay mothers who are 7 months pregnant to eat healthy:ohmy:, although this isn't likely to be monitored and they could spend it on fags and booze.:curse:
http://www.itv.com/News/Articles/Pre...healthily.html Having children is a choice, if you choose to have children they you should ensure you have the funds to support your children whatever. I choose not to have children, we have no family nearby, so one of us would have to give up work to look after them, I don't see the point of paying someone to look after my kids, or leaving them to come home from school to an empty house, so I can pay the mortgage, I would end up working for nothing. If one of us gave up our job then we would be living hand to mouth counting every penny, it is not how I want to live, I watched my mum struggle for years this way with no support whatsoever. This isn't for me so my choice is not to have children. What I do object to is the preferential treatment families get nowadays, tax credit, subsidies for childcare, child allowance even choice of holidays/shifts/carers leave and now money to buy fruit so they can eat healthily:curse:. I don't object to paying for education in my taxes, but I do object to subsidizing other people to have children, and constantly getting the short end of the stick. Al and I pay our taxes, we don't get any money back (I even have to pay tax on the money, £63/month,paid to me to buy a car that I only use for work), as a married, healthy childless couple we don't cost the government anything, we just pay. Fair enough, I'm not grumbling about paying tax because tax is just part of life, but why should I pay for other people to have children, that to me isn't fair. If you can't afford children don't have them, or don't have as many, children should be cherished, but for some people now they are just a commodity, a way of getting a house/money/food. Half of these people shouldn't be allowed to have children as they haven't got a clue how to raise them. I would rather my hard earned money be spent on ccompulsoryparenting classes as part of anti natal treatment than a bunch of bloody banana's:curse: Sorry for my rant, but I just find it crazy. </IMG></IMG></IMG></IMG> Sharon |
Re: Benefits in the UK for single Mums
Originally Posted by boxerdog03
(Post 5292379)
I've lept quiet on this thread up to now, then I watched on the news that the government are going to pay mothers who are 7 months pregnant to eat healthy:ohmy:, although this isn't likely to be monitored and they could spend it on fags and booze.:curse:
http://www.itv.com/News/Articles/Pre...healthily.html Having children is a choice, if you choose to have children they you should ensure you have the funds to support your children whatever. I choose not to have children, we have no family nearby, so one of us would have to give up work to look after them, I don't see the point of paying someone to look after my kids, or leaving them to come home from school to an empty house, so I can pay the mortgage, I would end up working for nothing. If one of us gave up our job then we would be living hand to mouth counting every penny, it is not how I want to live, I watched my mum struggle for years this way with no support whatsoever. This isn't for me so my choice is not to have children. What I do object to is the preferential treatment families get nowadays, tax credit, subsidies for childcare, child allowance even choice of holidays/shifts/carers leave and now money to buy fruit so they can eat healthily:curse:. I don't object to paying for education in my taxes, but I do object to subsidizing other people to have children, and constantly getting the short end of the stick. Al and I pay our taxes, we don't get any money back (I even have to pay tax on the money, £63/month,paid to me to buy a car that I only use for work), as a married, healthy childless couple we don't cost the government anything, we just pay. Fair enough, I'm not grumbling about paying tax because tax is just part of life, but why should I pay for other people to have children, that to me isn't fair. If you can't afford children don't have them, or don't have as many, children should be cherished, but for some people now they are just a commodity, a way of getting a house/money/food. Half of these people shouldn't be allowed to have children as they haven't got a clue how to raise them. I would rather my hard earned money be spent on ccompulsoryparenting classes as part of anti natal treatment than a bunch of bloody banana's:curse: Sorry for my rant, but I just find it crazy. </IMG></IMG></IMG></IMG> Sharon I sort of raised this earlier when I asked if the people who earned £££ gave their child benefit back. Why should everyone get money to pay for children?? I worked with plenty of people who had a very good income and who saved their kiddy cash up for "treats", they didnt need it. One thing about this case that really should have been asked is, are the kids well looked after, are they clean, clothed, supervised etc?? Is so then is that all that should matter??? I am off to eat supper now. I must get a life outside this forum |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:59 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.