Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
#33
Son number two thinks his 'i-phone' is better than his bro's crackberry, and even makes calls with it, as well as all the above.
#34
Banned







Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,085
From: Calgary, AB











They are just discussing this on 770am, man there are some f**king idiots in this province!
#37
BE Forum Addict









Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,423
From: 9 years in the canadian trucking industry... Niverville MB











Here is the definitve explanation on evolution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_BRZoXjOmI
and here is the full 10min version,, alot funnier,,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGrlWOhtj3g
Some bad language but in the best possible taste

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_BRZoXjOmI
and here is the full 10min version,, alot funnier,,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGrlWOhtj3g
Some bad language but in the best possible taste
Last edited by Gremmie; May 1st 2009 at 9:54 am.
#38
Part Time Poster









Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,219
From: Worcestershire











All the intelligent design idea proves
Is that there are some people who will go to great length to find an alternative idea if the mainstream one undermines their current position..
One key flaw in intelligent design is that it fails to come up with a reason for the intelligent designers existence, for it to exist and be intelligent under the hypothesis it would require an intelligent designer, the result is you either come up with a supreme being that has always existed and thus the question doesn’t apply (justification for a deity) or you enter a cyclic creation of intelligent designers of intelligent designers
When looked at from this angle, evolution is just much much simpler
Is that there are some people who will go to great length to find an alternative idea if the mainstream one undermines their current position..
One key flaw in intelligent design is that it fails to come up with a reason for the intelligent designers existence, for it to exist and be intelligent under the hypothesis it would require an intelligent designer, the result is you either come up with a supreme being that has always existed and thus the question doesn’t apply (justification for a deity) or you enter a cyclic creation of intelligent designers of intelligent designers
When looked at from this angle, evolution is just much much simpler
#39
All the intelligent design idea proves
Is that there are some people who will go to great length to find an alternative idea if the mainstream one undermines their current position..
One key flaw in intelligent design is that it fails to come up with a reason for the intelligent designers existence, for it to exist and be intelligent under the hypothesis it would require an intelligent designer, the result is you either come up with a supreme being that has always existed and thus the question doesn’t apply (justification for a deity) or you enter a cyclic creation of intelligent designers of intelligent designers
When looked at from this angle, evolution is just much much simpler
Is that there are some people who will go to great length to find an alternative idea if the mainstream one undermines their current position..
One key flaw in intelligent design is that it fails to come up with a reason for the intelligent designers existence, for it to exist and be intelligent under the hypothesis it would require an intelligent designer, the result is you either come up with a supreme being that has always existed and thus the question doesn’t apply (justification for a deity) or you enter a cyclic creation of intelligent designers of intelligent designers
When looked at from this angle, evolution is just much much simpler
And if there are all these intelligent designers around, why don't any of them work for Chrysler?
#40
All the intelligent design idea proves
Is that there are some people who will go to great length to find an alternative idea if the mainstream one undermines their current position..
One key flaw in intelligent design is that it fails to come up with a reason for the intelligent designers existence, for it to exist and be intelligent under the hypothesis it would require an intelligent designer, the result is you either come up with a supreme being that has always existed and thus the question doesn’t apply (justification for a deity) or you enter a cyclic creation of intelligent designers of intelligent designers
When looked at from this angle, evolution is just much much simpler
Is that there are some people who will go to great length to find an alternative idea if the mainstream one undermines their current position..
One key flaw in intelligent design is that it fails to come up with a reason for the intelligent designers existence, for it to exist and be intelligent under the hypothesis it would require an intelligent designer, the result is you either come up with a supreme being that has always existed and thus the question doesn’t apply (justification for a deity) or you enter a cyclic creation of intelligent designers of intelligent designers
When looked at from this angle, evolution is just much much simpler





