Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
Apr 30th 2009 | 2:09 pm
#16
half a century
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,222
From: Sarf Lundun to East Van :)
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
There's a legend that Lilith was really the first woman. Adam didn't like her much as she argued with him, she thought she was his equal, she didn't like him being on top. A feminist woman.
She left and God sent him Eve instead.
And this is priceless. I googled to see how many children Adam and Eve had and found this link
https://www.gotquestions.org/Adam-an...questions.html
Did you know that Adam and Eve didnt have belly buttons
And Adam lived for 930years. Yep it's all true.
She left and God sent him Eve instead.
And this is priceless. I googled to see how many children Adam and Eve had and found this link
https://www.gotquestions.org/Adam-an...questions.html
Did you know that Adam and Eve didnt have belly buttons
And Adam lived for 930years. Yep it's all true.
Apr 30th 2009 | 2:13 pm
#17
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,192
From: The Republic of Bacon
Apr 30th 2009 | 2:14 pm
#18
half a century
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,222
From: Sarf Lundun to East Van :)
Apr 30th 2009 | 2:34 pm
#19
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 636
From: Sittin' pretty on The Prairie in Alberda
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
Apr 30th 2009 | 2:36 pm
#20
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,710
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
Apr 30th 2009 | 3:03 pm
#21
Born again atheist
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
<votes conservative>
<goes to bed>
Apr 30th 2009 | 4:04 pm
#22
Banned
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,706
From: In Limbo
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
1) Simplistic explanation
2) totally incorrect explanation
Intelligent design is the assertion that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." No mention of god.
Intelligent design itself does not support the existence of a single god who created living organisms. Instead the idea of Intelligent design, first formulated before the (supposed) birth of a christ figure, has been 'hijacked' by creationists.
Apr 30th 2009 | 4:13 pm
#23
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 821
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
Stuart two things
1) Simplistic explanation
2) totally incorrect explanation
Intelligent design is the assertion that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." No mention of god.
Intelligent design itself does not support the existence of a single god who created living organisms. Instead the idea of Intelligent design, first formulated before the (supposed) birth of a christ figure, has been 'hijacked' by creationists.
1) Simplistic explanation
2) totally incorrect explanation
Intelligent design is the assertion that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." No mention of god.
Intelligent design itself does not support the existence of a single god who created living organisms. Instead the idea of Intelligent design, first formulated before the (supposed) birth of a christ figure, has been 'hijacked' by creationists.
Apr 30th 2009 | 5:00 pm
#24
Account Closed
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,319
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
I remember being told by my teacher in primary 3 that I was stupid when she asked "where do we come from" and I said "from the apes", the correct answer was Adam and Eve. I blame my granpa - he firmly believes in education and science and had explained the basics of evolution to me.
Really don't get why parents wouldn't want their children to know the facts and then make up their mind which version they believe.
Really don't get why parents wouldn't want their children to know the facts and then make up their mind which version they believe.
There is a darned more proof of evolution than there is of creationism. I prefer my children to make their choices based on evidence, not faith.
May 1st 2009 | 1:12 am
#25
RETIRED Realtor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,087
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
Stuart two things
1) Simplistic explanation
2) totally incorrect explanation
Intelligent design is the assertion that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." No mention of god.
Intelligent design itself does not support the existence of a single god who created living organisms. Instead the idea of Intelligent design, first formulated before the (supposed) birth of a christ figure, has been 'hijacked' by creationists.
1) Simplistic explanation
2) totally incorrect explanation
Intelligent design is the assertion that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." No mention of god.
Intelligent design itself does not support the existence of a single god who created living organisms. Instead the idea of Intelligent design, first formulated before the (supposed) birth of a christ figure, has been 'hijacked' by creationists.
May 1st 2009 | 1:36 am
#27
Banned
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,706
From: In Limbo
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
Stuart two things
1) Simplistic explanation
2) totally incorrect explanation
Intelligent design is the assertion that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." No mention of god.
Intelligent design itself does not support the existence of a single god who created living organisms. Instead the idea of Intelligent design, first formulated before the (supposed) birth of a christ figure, has been 'hijacked' by creationists.
1) Simplistic explanation
2) totally incorrect explanation
Intelligent design is the assertion that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." No mention of god.
Intelligent design itself does not support the existence of a single god who created living organisms. Instead the idea of Intelligent design, first formulated before the (supposed) birth of a christ figure, has been 'hijacked' by creationists.
Consider this (as far fetched and preposterous as it sounds) 100 years from now 'Mankind' has settled another 'world' he takes with him a desktop computer, a laptop and an I-phone. Technology has come so far that these devices are close to being sentinent beings and have the capablities of repairing and 'reproducing' themselves. A virus (lets call it Flying-Swine Flu) wipes out mankind and the 'devices' are left to fend for themselves, millions of years down the way the 'world' that man settled is now populated by 'races' of electronic devices. Yes they evolved BUT the original 'dinosaurs' came from elsewhere and were 'planted' by an 'intelligent cause'.
No perhaps it wants to be a dog?
May 1st 2009 | 1:41 am
#28
Born again atheist
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
Stuart (and I'm not trying to be pedantic here) the definition says intelligent cause, it does not mention a single entity, nor specifically intelligence.
Consider this (as far fetched and preposterous as it sounds) 100 years from now 'Mankind' has settled another 'world' he takes with him a desktop computer, a laptop and an I-phone. Technology has come so far that these devices are close to being sentinent beings and have the capablities of repairing and 'reproducing' themselves. A virus (lets call it Flying-Swine Flu) wipes out mankind and the 'devices' are left to fend for themselves, millions of years down the way the 'world' that man settled is now populated by 'races' of electronic devices. Yes they evolved BUT the original 'dinosaurs' came from elsewhere and were 'planted' by an 'intelligent cause'.
Consider this (as far fetched and preposterous as it sounds) 100 years from now 'Mankind' has settled another 'world' he takes with him a desktop computer, a laptop and an I-phone. Technology has come so far that these devices are close to being sentinent beings and have the capablities of repairing and 'reproducing' themselves. A virus (lets call it Flying-Swine Flu) wipes out mankind and the 'devices' are left to fend for themselves, millions of years down the way the 'world' that man settled is now populated by 'races' of electronic devices. Yes they evolved BUT the original 'dinosaurs' came from elsewhere and were 'planted' by an 'intelligent cause'.
I don't think it was too intelligent to take an i-phone. Who would you call?
<and anyway it would still work according to the laws of physics>.
May 1st 2009 | 1:43 am
#29
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,606
Re: Aaaargh...I thought we past this crap!!!
Consider this (as far fetched and preposterous as it sounds) 100 years from now 'Mankind' has settled another 'world' he takes with him a desktop computer, a laptop and an I-phone. Technology has come so far that these devices are close to being sentinent beings and have the capablities of repairing and 'reproducing' themselves. A virus (lets call it Flying-Swine Flu) wipes out mankind and the 'devices' are left to fend for themselves, millions of years down the way the 'world' that man settled is now populated by 'races' of electronic devices. Yes they evolved BUT the original 'dinosaurs' came from elsewhere and were 'planted' by an 'intelligent cause'.
