Wikiposts

100 million people

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 19th 2012 | 11:05 pm
  #1  
Siphorous's Avatar
Thread Starter
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 266
From: West Midlands
Siphorous has a brilliant futureSiphorous has a brilliant futureSiphorous has a brilliant futureSiphorous has a brilliant futureSiphorous has a brilliant futureSiphorous has a brilliant futureSiphorous has a brilliant futureSiphorous has a brilliant future
Default 100 million people

I was searching for something entirely different and came across this.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...186906/?page=1

Interesting. Does Canada really need to nearly triple its population?

The spread on the poll is interesting to see too. I expected more negative reaction but was pleasantly surprised by the split.
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 12:45 am
  #2  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 335
calliope is just really nicecalliope is just really nicecalliope is just really nicecalliope is just really nicecalliope is just really nicecalliope is just really nicecalliope is just really nicecalliope is just really nicecalliope is just really nice
Default Re: 100 million people

Originally Posted by Siphorous
I was searching for something entirely different and came across this.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...186906/?page=1

Interesting. Does Canada really need to nearly triple its population?

The spread on the poll is interesting to see too. I expected more negative reaction but was pleasantly surprised by the split.
If they want 100 million people they had better stop taking 5 years to process a visa.
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 1:06 am
  #3  
iaink's Avatar
Moderαtor Emeritus
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,771
From: Upstate South Carolina
iaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 100 million people

How many of those 100M will be working and contributing to the tax base...
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 1:13 am
  #4  
Almost Canadian's Avatar
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,402
From: South of Calgary
Almost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 100 million people

I find that bizarre. Has Australia's population stopped it becoming "independent", whatever that means?

Sounds like inferiority complex to me.
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 2:10 am
  #5  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 76
From: London, UK
hamazz is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 100 million people

well if you look at the landmass of canada, 2nd biggest in the world, however out of the top 5 countries it is the only one with a population less than 100million.

but they do need to sieve who to let in and make sure that people dont just immigrate to sit and claim benefits and dont give any benefit to the country.

hamazz
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 2:13 am
  #6  
iaink's Avatar
Moderαtor Emeritus
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 30,771
From: Upstate South Carolina
iaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 100 million people

Originally Posted by hamazz
well if you look at the landmass of canada, 2nd biggest in the world,
Dont be fooled though, only the southern most bits are fit for living.
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 2:24 am
  #7  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 76
From: London, UK
hamazz is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 100 million people

found this interesting to go with the above

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle4170229/

hamazz
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 2:24 am
  #8  
JamesM's Avatar
Dive Bar Drunk
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,671
From: Toronto
JamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond reputeJamesM has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 100 million people

Originally Posted by Siphorous
I was searching for something entirely different and came across this.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...186906/?page=1

Interesting. Does Canada really need to nearly triple its population?

The spread on the poll is interesting to see too. I expected more negative reaction but was pleasantly surprised by the split.
http://britishexpats.com/forum/showt...ghlight=JamesM
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 4:02 am
  #9  
el_richo's Avatar
Beep
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,311
From: Here
el_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 100 million people

Originally Posted by hamazz
well if you look at the landmass of canada, 2nd biggest in the world, however out of the top 5 countries it is the only one with a population less than 100million.

but they do need to sieve who to let in and make sure that people dont just immigrate to sit and claim benefits and dont give any benefit to the country.

hamazz
Where do you think this extra 65 Million people will live?

I'm pretty sure those currently living in the habitable areas won't be too pleased at the ultra-sprawl developed to accommodate everybody. They can barely manage to support infrastructure for the current population in the larger urban areas so they'd be ****ed with anywhere near that number.
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 4:30 am
  #10  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 931
From: 42
scribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of lightscribe123 is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: 100 million people

Interesting article.

It sounds like you should be given more points towards PR if you would be bringing children with you. Oooooh, I don't know; 10 points per child, no need to have a job on 'the list', and a fast track PR. That would do nicely and I think they should implement it tomorrow
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 4:46 am
  #11  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 76
From: London, UK
hamazz is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 100 million people

Originally Posted by scribe123
Interesting article.

It sounds like you should be given more points towards PR if you would be bringing children with you. Oooooh, I don't know; 10 points per child, no need to have a job on 'the list', and a fast track PR. That would do nicely and I think they should implement it tomorrow
that would be an idea, but then again alot of asians have bigger families, so maybe they would get in quicker....

well we do have the queen here, they should give us some points for that, we pay her bills etc.

hamazz
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 5:24 am
  #12  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,404
jericho is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 100 million people

Originally Posted by el_richo
Where do you think this extra 65 Million people will live?

I'm pretty sure those currently living in the habitable areas won't be too pleased at the ultra-sprawl developed to accommodate everybody. They can barely manage to support infrastructure for the current population in the larger urban areas so they'd be ****ed with anywhere near that number.
Yes me, again.

It's a bit of a fallacy to say that there arent enough habitable areas in Candada.
If you look at the zone between the US and say 100 or 200 mile belt of Canada, there's plenty of space right across the country.
Edmonton, despite it's cold winters, has close to 1 million people.
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 5:31 am
  #13  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 404
From: Calgary, Alberta
YoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond reputeYoshiPal2010 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 100 million people

Originally Posted by jericho
Yes me, again.

It's a bit of a fallacy to say that there arent enough habitable areas in Candada.
If you look at the zone between the US and say 100 or 200 mile belt of Canada, there's plenty of space right across the country.
Edmonton, despite it's cold winters, has close to 1 million people.
It's not so-much the space, it's the ability of the natural resources to service the population. Calgary, for example has 1.3 million people living in its environs. However, according to a recent report, the local water resources can only service around 2 million max. So a tripling of the population (to 3.5 million+?) would be a disaster for all!
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 5:48 am
  #14  
el_richo's Avatar
Beep
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,311
From: Here
el_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond reputeel_richo has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 100 million people

Originally Posted by jericho
Yes me, again.

It's a bit of a fallacy to say that there arent enough habitable areas in Candada.
If you look at the zone between the US and say 100 or 200 mile belt of Canada, there's plenty of space right across the country.
Edmonton, despite it's cold winters, has close to 1 million people.
Hello

By habitable, i mean currently available. Unless they build brand new enticing cities, with further surrounding sprawls of housing, hooked up to water, electrickery, gas, etc, (which will cost a fair few $'s to set up, and years of time), immigrants will continue to head toward the usual suspects of Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal (~70%).

Vancouver certainly is struggling to accommodate those coming now, let alone the future.

Immigrants will tend to go where the work is or where the weather pleases them most. I'm not so sure the large influx of asians would choose Lloydminster or Williams Lake over Vancouver, for example.

The government would have a hard sell on many of the "newer", more harsher (weather) areas to the current high volume demographics, in my opinion

Who knows. Maybe the economy or depletion of Alberta and NFLD money could put paid to any notion of it.
 
Old Jun 20th 2012 | 6:01 am
  #15  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,404
jericho is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 100 million people

The area I used to live in (Sherwood Park, AB), people remember it as being a small town that used to seem like miles away from Edmonton.
Now it's a city (in all but name) of 80,000 with it's own transit system, school boards, etc etc. Instead of being a vast space between Edmonton and Sherwood Park, like there used to be, the two are pretty much intertwined now.

I'm not suggesting that Canada could cope with 100m people now... but over the next 80/90 years (as suggested in the article) of course it could.

Whether or not Canada has the vision for it is a different question altogether though. My guess is that by the time Canada realises it needs more immigrants, humans will have colonised Mars.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.