Sir

It works both ways.

The lack of adjustment is almost entirely one way to the other. What tiny, tiny minority you keep referring to? Terror is a tactic. Like Blitzkrieg. It is the behavior of people during non-combat that sets the stage for all the muck. I really expect you to be mature about this rather than me having to explain this inch by inch.

It probably has taken the terror attacks for Europeans to have an opinion about Muslims and modern terror. What you missed, and, after incidents like Rotherham, are only slowly beginning to wake up to, is the blinding hatred of non-Muslims which drives so much of their behavior and actions, resulting in non-Muslims moving out of areas once the area begins to have a strong Muslim presence. You guys in Britain have had this for a few decades; we’ve been dealing with this for centuries now. It is impossible to pick out every single Muslim and call him or her a miscreant; it’s like calling every black a burglar. But, but. They have a doctrine which actively advocates for what you and I would describe as crimes against those they deem non-believers. They justify all such actions are religion-compliant. And the decent ones? They don’t speak a word when these things come to light. It’s the same story time and time again.

These guys set set themselves up for a backlash, then once it happens, take your tack and paint them as racist, sexist, Islamophobic what have you. You see it once, maybe it was a problem with the non-Muslims. Twice. Thrice. It keeps repeating and then you begin to wonder.

There is little chance of you selling the Arakan Salvation Army to Indians, especially after their allies butchered 260 Indians in Mumbai in 2008. I guess they are running out of shame in the UK. Been a while.

We are not new to Muslims, historically speaking, like your country. There is also the explanation that given their general aversion to learning and productive tasks, they are more likely to vouch for a welfare state the likes of which burden India senseless today. By no means are they the only moochers, but they are definitely among them. And, Pakistan. Why do you think that happened?

Let me qualify my remark by also saying that I have good relations with a number of Muslim friends and there are extremely capable ones among them. The differences are political; and we are all aware of that. Which is why a political partition was the best thing that could happen in the subcontinent. We are just different people, and it is only to outsiders like you with little idea of India that all brown people seem similar - now that’s racist.

It is tiresome and pedantic for Indians to explain to outsiders how and why they take positions the way they do. In any event, they’ve gone about the whole business as non-violently as possible. It is a miracle that, given the tensions between the two communities, the Partition violence claimed, officially 300,000 lives. Horrible, but true.

It it would be one thing if you were simply unaware; you seem to be willfully ignorant. That’s a real concern.

Sir

It sure does concern me as well.

Sir

The concern is that around the world, polytheistic cultures such as those of the Native Americans, Polynesians, Africans, Chinese and Indians are at risk of being swamped out of existence by rather violent, apocalyptic, and frankly megalomaniacal Middle East monotheisms, religious and non-religious. I have travelled the world sufficiently far and wide to note that it is above all the polytheistic cultures, ie cultures that allow you to express your doctrine in the way you see fit within an environment of mutual respect and celebration that are most at peace with man and nature.

The argument is not so much about Muslims in India as it is about monotheists in general. They have a severe problem with other people who do not follow their doctrine or their god. They are hell-bent on converting others into their faith ie eliminating the culture of other people. And as for Muslims, they complain about being mistreated in India - how is their situation any better in the countries of the Middle East where they are the majority; leave alone the minorities in those places? All internal violence aside, they know they are safer among non-Muslim majorities than non-Muslims are amongst them.

The large Muslim population you speak of carved a country for themselves with British aid called Pakistan. They’d been fighting for the privilege since 1921. Why aren’t they doing the due and moving there? Why can’t they leave the kaffirs in peace? Let us go to hell, for all they care. India is but one theatre in this argument; the debate is being played on a global scale. Only the willfully ignorant and politically correct automatons prefer to look away.

At least you agree about the evils of religious extremism, All religions including, monotheistic Hinduism.

Mate, put this to a Muslim. Do they regard idol worshipping Hindus as equals?