Solberg hints at lower immigration target...
#1
Thread Starter










Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,883

I'm not at all sure how this will affect those currently in the system but it looks like the 300,000 a year target is out the window.
Backlog of 800,000 applicants. :scared::scared:
260,000 per year may be acceptable according to this CBC article.
Seems to me it was said here during the election that the conservatives were not exactly immigration friendly.
Cheers
Steve
Backlog of 800,000 applicants. :scared::scared:
260,000 per year may be acceptable according to this CBC article.
Seems to me it was said here during the election that the conservatives were not exactly immigration friendly.
Cheers
Steve
Last edited by Hangman; May 11th 2006 at 5:47 am.
#2
Originally Posted by Hangman
I'm not at all sure how this will affect those currently in the system but it looks like the 300,000 a year target is out the window.
Backlog of 800,000 applicants. :scared::scared:
260,000 per years my be acceptable according to this CBC article.
Seems to me it was said here during the election that the conservatives were not exactly immigration friendly.
Cheers
Steve
Backlog of 800,000 applicants. :scared::scared:
260,000 per years my be acceptable according to this CBC article.
Seems to me it was said here during the election that the conservatives were not exactly immigration friendly.
Cheers
Steve
#3










Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,606

This is an environmentally unfriendly move that reflects this week's government's position on Kyoto. Fewer immigrants = fewer taxis = more people driving themselves about.
#4
Originally Posted by dbd33
I believe I took a harder line than "not exactly immigration friendly". They're no friends of us CFAs.
#5
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
CFA?
#6
Originally Posted by dbd33
Come From Away. Immigrants in the local argot.
#7
Hi
Yeah, but he never said anything about the lowering the 235-260K per year as it is now. The Liberals while in power always trotted out the 1% of Canada's population as it goal for the number of immigrants per year every election. Odd they were in Power for the previous 10 years and the "quota" never changed.
Originally Posted by batty-x-ray
ty , cfa, gtk.
#8
It's a monster sized screw up...Canada needs many skills, what they're doing about it ? Uh, not much and not exactly helping fill the skills void. Anyone with a pair of eyes and a bit of pulpy gray mush lolling about inside their cranium can see how much Canada needs a large portion of skills and experience.
Sensible ? Course not. Typical politicians (of any creed).
Glad I'm <here living> not <there waiting> zzzz.
Rich.
Sensible ? Course not. Typical politicians (of any creed).
Glad I'm <here living> not <there waiting> zzzz.
Rich.
#9
Originally Posted by Hangman
I'm not at all sure how this will affect those currently in the system but it looks like the 300,000 a year target is out the window.
Backlog of 800,000 applicants. :scared::scared:
260,000 per year may be acceptable according to this CBC article.
Seems to me it was said here during the election that the conservatives were not exactly immigration friendly.
Cheers
Steve
Backlog of 800,000 applicants. :scared::scared:
260,000 per year may be acceptable according to this CBC article.
Seems to me it was said here during the election that the conservatives were not exactly immigration friendly.
Cheers
Steve






