![]() |
Re: Question on Ages
Originally Posted by SteveHarris
(Post 8285752)
We moved when we were 35 and the kids were 3.5.
How do you figure that 28 is too late to start again? I must admit that I've not seen any ageism - in fact quite the opposite. Cheers - Steve |
Re: Question on Ages
Originally Posted by dannyg1001
(Post 8284613)
I first came when I was 21 on a bunac visa, and then became a PR aged 24... I just turned 30 a couple of weeks ago, cant believe it was almost 10 years ago I first came to Edmonton!!!
|
Re: Question on Ages
I just turned 28 a few months ago and I occasionally feel too old for this sort of thing, it feels like a massive gamble.
|
Re: Question on Ages
Me and wifey were 28...
|
Re: Question on Ages
An aging wreck writes:
Surely it's not chronological age that matters but commitments. It would not have entered my head to emigrate while my children (estranged but still in regular contact through the medium of their Amex bills) were in school. Now that they're not it would again be reasonable for me to consider shuffling off somewhere else. A single person of whatever age may as well go for it, someone who has a family to think of, especially someone who has children of high school age, wants to have a good think and, if going, wants to have, at least, a job sorted. |
Re: Question on Ages
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8286706)
while my children (estranged but still in regular contact through the medium of their Amex bills)
|
Re: Question on Ages
We're hoping to move over as PR's in 2012, we will be 26 & 27 then and our kids will be 7 and 4.
|
Re: Question on Ages
Originally Posted by DigitalGhost
(Post 8286718)
That was really funny, yet extremely tragic at the same time.
|
Re: Question on Ages
Originally Posted by Kaye.
(Post 8286722)
We're hoping to move over as PR's in 2012, we will be 26 & 27 then and our kids will be 7 and 4.
|
Re: Question on Ages
Originally Posted by Kaye.
(Post 8286722)
We're hoping to move over as PR's in 2012, we will be 26 & 27 then and our kids will be 7 and 4.
|
Re: Question on Ages
Originally Posted by linz3112
(Post 8286783)
We are looking at about the same timeline - Hubby will be 31 and i will be 27, Son will be 7. Also looking at Calgary/Okotoks area! :thumbsup:
Originally Posted by DigitalGhost
(Post 8286788)
Wow, I guessed you were young from your picture but I didn't guess that young. What visa are you going over there on if you don't mind me asking?
|
Re: Question on Ages
Originally Posted by Kaye.
(Post 8286956)
Similar ages then, hopefully see you over there in 2012 :D Have you applied yet?
Why thank you kind sir :rofl: We will be applying under FSW1 as hubby is a welder which is on the list. Assuming of course that his job is not taken off the list before we apply next year :unsure: Good luck with the move and everything though, I think it will be a much healthier country for your kids to grow up in. Ironically my parents were considering a move there when I was young based on my Dad's job but they didn't go in the end, one of the reasons being because my Mum thought that American clothes were crap. :lol: |
Re: Question on Ages
I was 36 and Mr Chookie was 32 when we moved over here almost 4 years ago.
If 28 is over the hill, we must have been considered ancient! |
Re: Question on Ages
Well we are even more over the hill (and haven't even put the form in yet...). Early/mid 40s. We're not the first in our family to move countries at this age, so must be something in the genes (madness - yeah, thought I'd get in first)!
I think each family's circumstances are different, so age isn't always a good indicator and one size doesn't fit all. I know people who were "old" at 21. We take on board points about moving back in our careers (although that doesn't really apply to us - I start again every time I move firms, there is no career structure in secretarial work) and my hubby has just retrained - so we are both at the bottom, despite being ancient. Age brings advantages - we have more capital accrued; we have experience of relocating and are very resourceful - our kids have moved several times before (though not over an ocean) and are very adaptable. We're older and wiser than we were in our 20s and while we are willing to take a risk, we realise we could fail. We're prepared to take a lower status job - hey, who wants to be top of the ladder anyway - and take life a bit easier. There are advantages to being young with no ties - but don't write off us oldies - there are plenty of advantages to age too! |
Re: Question on Ages
advantage to age, you have lots of sweets to give to children like my grandparents? :D
im 19 at looking at moving, i first started looking 3 years ago, for some reason i could move back then. i hoping to get it all sorted this year or next year, why do recessions always break plans! |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:36 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.