Decided not to go
#106
Yorkshire meets Vegas






Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,354
From: T. ON (so there!)











Originally Posted by indybrit
Sarah, I'm curious as to how long you've lived in Canada and how your job is currently working out for you?
#107
Originally Posted by Sarah Farrand
As my profile clearly states, I'm landing in January. I don't think that this disqualifies me from having an opinion.
It just reiterates what I said earlier, but then judging from your reply you already knew that.
#108
Yorkshire meets Vegas






Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,354
From: T. ON (so there!)











Originally Posted by indybrit
It's about prospective immigrants being missled into believing that they will be allowed to work in a job in Canada only to learn once they're here that they cannot
I work in Market Research and the tools used in Canada are quite different to those in the UK. I made sure that I knew (a) what these were and (b) if there were any regularitory restrictions before I set out on the process
I'm not referring specifically to Mr and Mrs Lifty, but I would have thought it would be fairly commonsense to check out for yourself what the state of play is regarding regulations.
You're going to a country that is completely new. Surely you don't expect that life will be exactly the same when you get there.
I've done an awful lot of research into what life in Canada will be like, despite the fact that I have family over there and that I have stayed there numerous times over the last 10 years. Yet even so I don't expect it to be how I have pictured it. There will be surprises - both pleasant and unpleasant
#109
Yorkshire meets Vegas






Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,354
From: T. ON (so there!)











Originally Posted by indybrit
No it does not disqualify you from having an opinion.
It just reiterates what I said earlier, but then judging from your reply you already knew that.
It just reiterates what I said earlier, but then judging from your reply you already knew that.
I can't agree. I'm being sponsored for a work visa by a company that is paying me what I would earn in the UK. The salary I'm earning is at the top end of the range they were offering Canadians for the position. In fact they were quite apologetic about not being able to offer more. Discrimination? I don't think so.
#110
Originally Posted by Tom Masters
I'm sure there are many professionals who do just that and decide not to bother with Canada. Once they realise the amount of protectionism that exists here they probably head off to another country with more vision and less hoops to jump through. Canada's loss. Very unfortunate for a country that supposedly needs more skilled workers. Or is it just a big con and a very good money making scheme?!
To obtain RN status here is a hell lot more straightforward from my experience than the US (a load of bureaucratic tripe) and from reading the OZ nurses experiences in this forum doesn't appear any less that theirs.
In fact the process is amazingly straightforward here in Alberta provided you have the qualifications and the necessary hours.
I have a colleague at work who is doing the reverse process (applying to the UK) and is encountering far worse problems than me (e.g 30 quid or something for the application pack) and a much slower and bureaucratic process than I encountered which she could then consider to be protectionism.
IMO Canada is being unfairly represented here (from a nursing viewpoint). They have every right just as other countries do (including the UK) to have standards.
As I said earlier there is nothing to stop you from applying for your licence well before your visa application. Of course it is going to cost money, all administration tasks do, but hell at least (unlike the UK) they don't charge you for an application pack.
If Canada is guilty then so too is the UK.
#111
You know the sad part is that if this issue of misleading immigrants could be sorted out then in my opinion Canada would be the most wonderful place in the world.
I moved there with my family in 1995 and yes, we did quite a lot of research before leaving. Back then it was a little different.
I flew to Ontario for an interview, got the job, was given a reference number by the Kitchener immigration office and then flew back to the UK.
Two weeks later I was granted a work visa from London, UK. Within a week I was back in Kitchener and working in my new job.
The entire thing took less than three weeks from start to finish. Needless to say that I didn't have all that much time to research Canada although I did the best I could given the time constraints.
We have never had any regrets in moving to Canada. Right now I am working in the US and would very much like to be back in Canada where my daughter still lives.
Canada is a beautiful place with much to offer, at least in my opinion anyway.
I moved there with my family in 1995 and yes, we did quite a lot of research before leaving. Back then it was a little different.
I flew to Ontario for an interview, got the job, was given a reference number by the Kitchener immigration office and then flew back to the UK.
Two weeks later I was granted a work visa from London, UK. Within a week I was back in Kitchener and working in my new job.
The entire thing took less than three weeks from start to finish. Needless to say that I didn't have all that much time to research Canada although I did the best I could given the time constraints.
We have never had any regrets in moving to Canada. Right now I am working in the US and would very much like to be back in Canada where my daughter still lives.
Canada is a beautiful place with much to offer, at least in my opinion anyway.
#112
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 338
From: Vancouver

Originally Posted by indybrit
You know the sad part is that if this issue of misleading immigrants could be sorted out then in my opinion Canada would be the most wonderful place in the world.
I moved there with my family in 1995 and yes, we did quite a lot of research before leaving. Back then it was a little different.
I flew to Ontario for an interview, got the job, was given a reference number by the Kitchener immigration office and then flew back to the UK.
Two weeks later I was granted a work visa from London, UK. Within a week I was back in Kitchener and working in my new job.
The entire thing took less than three weeks from start to finish. Needless to say that I didn't have all that much time to research Canada although I did the best I could given the time constraints.
We have never had any regrets in moving to Canada. Right now I am working in the US and would very much like to be back in Canada where my daughter still lives.
Canada is a beautiful place with much to offer, at least in my opinion anyway.
I moved there with my family in 1995 and yes, we did quite a lot of research before leaving. Back then it was a little different.
I flew to Ontario for an interview, got the job, was given a reference number by the Kitchener immigration office and then flew back to the UK.
Two weeks later I was granted a work visa from London, UK. Within a week I was back in Kitchener and working in my new job.
The entire thing took less than three weeks from start to finish. Needless to say that I didn't have all that much time to research Canada although I did the best I could given the time constraints.
We have never had any regrets in moving to Canada. Right now I am working in the US and would very much like to be back in Canada where my daughter still lives.
Canada is a beautiful place with much to offer, at least in my opinion anyway.
#113
The thread has obviously evolved to a broader topic than purely Mr & Mrs Liftman's case (whom it has to be said seem to have been led a right merry dance by Canadian officialdom).
To lighten things up a bit:
There are two types of 'immigrants' emerging here. The hippies and the pragmatists.
The hippies are prepared to take any job (at least in the short term) and also prepared to take a considerable financial hit if it doesn't work out. Head in the clouds, totally unrealistic, and could set them back years on failure.
The pragmatists are scared s**tless of impending and near certain financial doom and will die of low self esteem should they not get right back up the career ladder asap.
Two very different approaches - to very valid approaches to immigration
It would be interesting to hear from Canadians or ex pats already over there as to which group has the best chance of making a go of it! Also which group are also the most realistic in their approach? Which are the best for Canada?!!
PS To avoid gross generalisations can I just say that I think the UK is a damn fine place.
To lighten things up a bit:
There are two types of 'immigrants' emerging here. The hippies and the pragmatists.
The hippies are prepared to take any job (at least in the short term) and also prepared to take a considerable financial hit if it doesn't work out. Head in the clouds, totally unrealistic, and could set them back years on failure.
The pragmatists are scared s**tless of impending and near certain financial doom and will die of low self esteem should they not get right back up the career ladder asap.
Two very different approaches - to very valid approaches to immigration

It would be interesting to hear from Canadians or ex pats already over there as to which group has the best chance of making a go of it! Also which group are also the most realistic in their approach? Which are the best for Canada?!!
PS To avoid gross generalisations can I just say that I think the UK is a damn fine place.
#114
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 338
From: Vancouver

Originally Posted by P & K
The thread has obviously evolved to a broader topic than purely Mr & Mrs Liftman's case (whom it has to be said seem to have been led a right merry dance by Canadian officialdom).
To lighten things up a bit:
There are two types of 'immigrants' emerging here. The hippies and the pragmatists.
The hippies are prepared to take any job (at least in the short term) and also prepared to take a considerable financial hit if it doesn't work out. Head in the clouds, totally unrealistic, and could set them back years on failure.
The pragmatists are scared s**tless of impending and near certain financial doom and will die of low self esteem should they not get right back up the career ladder asap.
Two very different approaches - to very valid approaches to immigration
It would be interesting to hear from Canadians or ex pats already over there as to which group has the best chance of making a go of it! Also which group are also the most realistic in their approach? Which are the best for Canada?!!
PS To avoid gross generalisations can I just say that I think the UK is a damn fine place.
To lighten things up a bit:
There are two types of 'immigrants' emerging here. The hippies and the pragmatists.
The hippies are prepared to take any job (at least in the short term) and also prepared to take a considerable financial hit if it doesn't work out. Head in the clouds, totally unrealistic, and could set them back years on failure.
The pragmatists are scared s**tless of impending and near certain financial doom and will die of low self esteem should they not get right back up the career ladder asap.
Two very different approaches - to very valid approaches to immigration

It would be interesting to hear from Canadians or ex pats already over there as to which group has the best chance of making a go of it! Also which group are also the most realistic in their approach? Which are the best for Canada?!!
PS To avoid gross generalisations can I just say that I think the UK is a damn fine place.
#115
Yorkshire meets Vegas






Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,354
From: T. ON (so there!)











Originally Posted by Jonny
he he... very funny. Should lighten the mood. I think I may be in the hippy group.
But then I am a Gemini
#116
Originally Posted by Sarah Farrand
I think my head is in the pragmatists group, and my heart is in the hippy group.
#117
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 453
From: London Ontario











Originally Posted by Iginla
From my experience and from a a nursing point of view I'm going to have to disagree with you.
To obtain RN status here is a hell lot more straightforward from my experience than the US (a load of bureaucratic tripe) and from reading the OZ nurses experiences in this forum doesn't appear any less that theirs.
In fact the process is amazingly straightforward here in Alberta provided you have the qualifications and the necessary hours.
I have a colleague at work who is doing the reverse process (applying to the UK) and is encountering far worse problems than me (e.g 30 quid or something for the application pack) and a much slower and bureaucratic process than I encountered which she could then consider to be protectionism.
IMO Canada is being unfairly represented here (from a nursing viewpoint). They have every right just as other countries do (including the UK) to have standards.
As I said earlier there is nothing to stop you from applying for your licence well before your visa application. Of course it is going to cost money, all administration tasks do, but hell at least (unlike the UK) they don't charge you for an application pack.
If Canada is guilty then so too is the UK.
To obtain RN status here is a hell lot more straightforward from my experience than the US (a load of bureaucratic tripe) and from reading the OZ nurses experiences in this forum doesn't appear any less that theirs.
In fact the process is amazingly straightforward here in Alberta provided you have the qualifications and the necessary hours.
I have a colleague at work who is doing the reverse process (applying to the UK) and is encountering far worse problems than me (e.g 30 quid or something for the application pack) and a much slower and bureaucratic process than I encountered which she could then consider to be protectionism.
IMO Canada is being unfairly represented here (from a nursing viewpoint). They have every right just as other countries do (including the UK) to have standards.
As I said earlier there is nothing to stop you from applying for your licence well before your visa application. Of course it is going to cost money, all administration tasks do, but hell at least (unlike the UK) they don't charge you for an application pack.
If Canada is guilty then so too is the UK.
From a teaching point of view, it does cost for an application pack here in Ontario and you can't apply to be a registered member of the Ontario College of Teachers unless you are a landed immigrant and have a SIN number. I tried to do this before I left the UK but was told I would have to wait until I got here.
I also asked whether there were any courses I could do in order to prepare the way for me working here but the answer again was no.
I have a B.Ed (Hons) and a MA in Primary Education aswell as having international work experience. It has been suggested that the best way for me to get into teaching in this little corner of Southwestern Ontario is to become a temporary educational assistant to get my foot in the door.
Chris
#118
Originally Posted by Tom Masters
From a teaching point of view, it does cost for an application pack here in Ontario and you can't apply to be a registered member of the Ontario College of Teachers unless you are a landed immigrant and have a SIN number. I tried to do this before I left the UK but was told I would have to wait until I got here.
but can you have your assessment done from out of country?
#119
Forum Regular


Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 50






Originally Posted by Iginla
IMO Canada is being unfairly represented here (from a nursing viewpoint). They have every right just as other countries do (including the UK) to have standards.
Last edited by discouraged; Nov 26th 2004 at 3:23 am.
#120
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 453
From: London Ontario











Originally Posted by Iginla
OK, that is bad!
but can you have your assessment done from out of country?
but can you have your assessment done from out of country?




