Flood Levy
#136
Re: Flood Levy
Ive just realised the horrible truth here.
Gillard and Bligh cannot possibly show a surplus now at the election or any time in between because to do so would demonstrate they could have avoided this unpopular tax. So they'll have a massive incentive to spend it all (no matter on what)
You really *can* imagine the meeting to discuss making sure *any* surplus is spent to make sure they demonstrate that they really needed this.
Well, you can if you ever watched Yes Minister.
Gillard and Bligh cannot possibly show a surplus now at the election or any time in between because to do so would demonstrate they could have avoided this unpopular tax. So they'll have a massive incentive to spend it all (no matter on what)
You really *can* imagine the meeting to discuss making sure *any* surplus is spent to make sure they demonstrate that they really needed this.
Well, you can if you ever watched Yes Minister.
#137
Re: Flood Levy
If the average self-employed person's business goes under and they 'hit the wall' financially, do they expect the govt or the people to bail them out? No. Does the govt. start a levy for them? No. They chose to start a business and made bad business decisions and thus reap the consequences.
Same with the floods. They chose to live there in full knowledge the areas are prone to floods. Their decision and they need to accept responsibility for their own actions.
This is the biggest problem with society today. The lack of acceptance of responsibility; always expecting someone else to bail them out.
But thats my point!! The levy that is being talked about is not for the flooded people. Its for the infrastructure. You know - roads, bridges etc. None of this levy will be used to rebuild peoples houses.
The flood affected people will not recieve a penny of direct aid from this levy. (maybe indirect if they happen to be involved in the construction trade and are involved in the rebiluding effort).
Yes you're right, it was their decision to live on a flood plain (and thats why the majority had insurance, some didnt I agree and some had the wrong insurance, but the majority did), but does that mean nobody should ever live anywhere that there is a 1 in 50 year or 1 in 100 year risk that a natural disaster might occur? Lovely thought but a bit naive in my opinion.
And when that 1 in a 100 year event does occur, does that mean the rest of us should just shrug our shoulders and say "your choice mate - tough"
I dont think the people in the flood affected areas expect the rest of us to 'bail them out' as you put it, but I do believe they will gratefully recieve any assistance that we feel able to donate (whether thats time or money or both).
I do however think and expect that the govt, both state and federal, will repair the damaged infrastructure and therefore logically I expect my tax to go up slightly after a natural disater of this magnitude.
Anyone that didnt expect that had their head in the sand in my opinion.
#138
Re: Flood Levy
but does that mean nobody should ever live anywhere that there is a 1 in 50 year or 1 in 100 year risk that a natural disaster might occur? Lovely thought but a bit naive in my opinion.
And when that 1 in a 100 year event does occur, does that mean the rest of us should just shrug our shoulders and say "your choice mate - tough".
And when that 1 in a 100 year event does occur, does that mean the rest of us should just shrug our shoulders and say "your choice mate - tough".
What was the Brisbane flood peak? A bit under 4.5m?
Seems like worse than that happened 3 times in 10 years before.
http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/ql..._history.shtml
One thing that's telling is that the flood peak was 1m lower than 1974, but it seems like nearly 4 times as many homes were flooded this time.
#139
Home and Happy
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,786
Re: Flood Levy
Yes I object to that too, I have already donated the amount I wanted, the way I wanted.
During the free transport week I used a bus in the Gold Coast and was told I must donate $2 per person into an open tin to get on the bus, I told the driver I don't have $2 but I have a gocard that is in credit, that is the requirment for using translink services. How do I know he is honest? Maybe he is but the system is open to abuse.
During the free transport week I used a bus in the Gold Coast and was told I must donate $2 per person into an open tin to get on the bus, I told the driver I don't have $2 but I have a gocard that is in credit, that is the requirment for using translink services. How do I know he is honest? Maybe he is but the system is open to abuse.
#140
Re: Flood Levy
Yes you're right, it was their decision to live on a flood plain (and thats why the majority had insurance, some didnt I agree and some had the wrong insurance, but the majority did), but does that mean nobody should ever live anywhere that there is a 1 in 50 year or 1 in 100 year risk that a natural disaster might occur? Lovely thought but a bit naive in my opinion.
#141
Home and Happy
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,786
Re: Flood Levy
The media loves this one in x years stuff. Is it really 1 in 100 years? How long have people been tracking floods in Australia?
What was the Brisbane flood peak? A bit under 4.5m?
Seems like worse than that happened 3 times in 10 years before.
http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/ql..._history.shtml
One thing that's telling is that the flood peak was 1m lower than 1974, but it seems like nearly 4 times as many homes were flooded this time.
What was the Brisbane flood peak? A bit under 4.5m?
Seems like worse than that happened 3 times in 10 years before.
http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/ql..._history.shtml
One thing that's telling is that the flood peak was 1m lower than 1974, but it seems like nearly 4 times as many homes were flooded this time.
#142
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,048
Re: Flood Levy
I'm surprised that nobody has moaned about the increase in food prices due to the flooding that have been touted in the papers.
Can't Coles and Woolies just import the stuff when there is a shortage? Surely if the price of something increases after the flooding then that means there is a shortage?
For those on average incomes the new tax is only a couple of dollars extra a week, meanwhile in the papers - sensationalism I know - increases up to 50% are being forecast! Surely everybody would be more worried about the cost of living?
Can't Coles and Woolies just import the stuff when there is a shortage? Surely if the price of something increases after the flooding then that means there is a shortage?
For those on average incomes the new tax is only a couple of dollars extra a week, meanwhile in the papers - sensationalism I know - increases up to 50% are being forecast! Surely everybody would be more worried about the cost of living?
#143
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,442
Re: Flood Levy
The flood affected people will not recieve a penny of direct aid from this levy. (maybe indirect if they happen to be involved in the construction trade and are involved in the rebiluding effort).
Yes you're right, it was their decision to live on a flood plain (and thats why the majority had insurance, some didnt I agree and some had the wrong insurance, but the majority did), but does that mean nobody should ever live anywhere that there is a 1 in 50 year or 1 in 100 year risk that a natural disaster might occur? Lovely thought but a bit naive in my opinion.
Shit happens, that's life.
And when that 1 in a 100 year event does occur, does that mean the rest of us should just shrug our shoulders and say "your choice mate - tough"
I dont think the people in the flood affected areas expect the rest of us to 'bail them out' as you put it, but I do believe they will gratefully recieve any assistance that we feel able to donate (whether thats time or money or both).
I do however think and expect that the govt, both state and federal, will repair the damaged infrastructure and therefore logically I expect my tax to go up slightly after a natural disater of this magnitude.
Anyone that didnt expect that had their head in the sand in my opinion.
Anyone that didnt expect that had their head in the sand in my opinion.
#144
Account Closed
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188
Re: Flood Levy
What happens if this "1 in a 100 year" flood happens again in another two years, and then again three years later and then again the year after that?
We keep hearing about the effects of climate change... what if this really is climate change at work?
I know that these areas are historically prone to flooding, but what happens if this is the start of regular serious floods?
Do we keep pouring money into the area ad infinitum?
We keep hearing about the effects of climate change... what if this really is climate change at work?
I know that these areas are historically prone to flooding, but what happens if this is the start of regular serious floods?
Do we keep pouring money into the area ad infinitum?
#145
Re: Flood Levy
I agree.....its stupid. So what about everyone who lives in FNQ with cyclones happening fairly often? What about people in Victoria (and other states) who live in bushfire prone areas/ drought areas? Should we allow the insurance companies repeatedly wriggle out of paying for people who do the right thing and take out insurance, to be told they are not covered? And where are these people supposed to live Just In Case theres another flood in 30 years time..? the rise in population (all over the world) is making it nigh on impossible to live somewhere that doesnt get freakish weather/ disasters.....of some kind or other. Perhaps we should go and live in space. In a box....
#146
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,442
Re: Flood Levy
What happens if this "1 in a 100 year" flood happens again in another two years, and then again three years later and then again the year after that?
We keep hearing about the effects of climate change... what if this really is climate change at work?
I know that these areas are historically prone to flooding, but what happens if this is the start of regular serious floods?
Do we keep pouring money into the area ad infinitum?
We keep hearing about the effects of climate change... what if this really is climate change at work?
I know that these areas are historically prone to flooding, but what happens if this is the start of regular serious floods?
Do we keep pouring money into the area ad infinitum?
#147
Re: Flood Levy
...
If it is a known flood zone or bushfire area then yes because on the balance of probability, if it has happened once it can happen again and don't forget, it wasn't 100 years ago that was the last time there were floods. The last major ones were in 1974 which is not too long ago. This 100 years stuff is political spin.
...
If it is a known flood zone or bushfire area then yes because on the balance of probability, if it has happened once it can happen again and don't forget, it wasn't 100 years ago that was the last time there were floods. The last major ones were in 1974 which is not too long ago. This 100 years stuff is political spin.
...
Last edited by fish.01; Jan 28th 2011 at 5:40 am.
#148
Re: Flood Levy
But thats just naive to think that. They're Govt. ie by definition they dont use money as wisely as they could/should. Its got nothing to do with them being socialists. The Liberal / Conservative / Republican govts worldwide are pretty good at wasting money as well. Its the nature of Govt and you're whistling dixie if you think thats going to change anytime soon. Learn to live with it and plan for it. Or get involved in Govt yourself and work to change it (good luck!!!!)
Otherwise you're just going to give yourself high blood pressure working yourself up about it.
As for the rest of your post, I'll just say I hope I never need any help or compassion when you're walking on by!
#149
Re: Flood Levy
The media loves this one in x years stuff. Is it really 1 in 100 years? How long have people been tracking floods in Australia?
What was the Brisbane flood peak? A bit under 4.5m?
Seems like worse than that happened 3 times in 10 years before.
http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/ql..._history.shtml
One thing that's telling is that the flood peak was 1m lower than 1974, but it seems like nearly 4 times as many homes were flooded this time.
What was the Brisbane flood peak? A bit under 4.5m?
Seems like worse than that happened 3 times in 10 years before.
http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/ql..._history.shtml
One thing that's telling is that the flood peak was 1m lower than 1974, but it seems like nearly 4 times as many homes were flooded this time.
#150
Re: Flood Levy
Ive just realised the horrible truth here.
Gillard and Bligh cannot possibly show a surplus now at the election or any time in between because to do so would demonstrate they could have avoided this unpopular tax. So they'll have a massive incentive to spend it all (no matter on what)
You really *can* imagine the meeting to discuss making sure *any* surplus is spent to make sure they demonstrate that they really needed this.
Well, you can if you ever watched Yes Minister.
Gillard and Bligh cannot possibly show a surplus now at the election or any time in between because to do so would demonstrate they could have avoided this unpopular tax. So they'll have a massive incentive to spend it all (no matter on what)
You really *can* imagine the meeting to discuss making sure *any* surplus is spent to make sure they demonstrate that they really needed this.
Well, you can if you ever watched Yes Minister.