|
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Some people seem to be talking about recessive genes as if they were faulty genes. They're not. They are perfectly normal genes - it's just that their "characteristic" can be overridden by a more dominant gene.
:) |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by MartinLuther
(Post 5015617)
Some people seem to be talking about recessive genes as if they were faulty genes. They're not. They are perfectly normal genes - it's just that their "characteristic" can be overridden by a more dominant gene.
:) |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by MartinLuther
(Post 5015579)
Anyone who thinks that the moon landings weren't faked should take a look at this. The evidence is compelling.
http://stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_la...n_landings.htm :D I stand corrected... S |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by MartinLuther
(Post 5015617)
Some people seem to be talking about recessive genes as if they were faulty genes. They're not. They are perfectly normal genes - it's just that their "characteristic" can be overridden by a more dominant gene.
:) |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by MartinLuther
(Post 5015579)
Anyone who thinks that the moon landings weren't faked should take a look at this. The evidence is compelling.
http://stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_la...n_landings.htm :D |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 5016408)
I *do* hope you speak tongue in cheek :D
:) |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by MartinLuther
(Post 5016710)
Oh yes. But I've got the clangers in tape (for the kids obviously) and it has the episode with the spaceman. I thought the website was a fantastic parody of the the conspiracy theory.
:) The first photos were "taken" by some outside agency and I honestly thought you had been conned by the site: apologies! |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 5016748)
Sorry - I only looked at the first bit and didn't scroll down to see the clangers etc!
The first photos were "taken" by some outside agency and I honestly thought you had been conned by the site: apologies! I wonder if Swervo did the same as you? :D |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by MartinLuther
(Post 5017408)
:lol: She'll be right mate :lol:
I wonder if Swervo did the same as you? :D |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by iPom
(Post 5017731)
I think I can say in complete confidence that he did not.
:) |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by MartinLuther
(Post 5019907)
So you think it was deadpan rather than sarcasm? How could you tell?
:) It's just my way. Imagine me to be some kind of awful cross between Jack Dee and Jimmy carr, then you've pretty much got me... :D S |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by MartinLuther
(Post 5019907)
So you think it was deadpan rather than sarcasm? How could you tell?
:)
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 5020568)
It's just my way. Imagine me to be some kind of awful cross between Jack Dee and Jimmy carr, then you've pretty much got me...
:D S |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by iPom
(Post 5020585)
Yeah, what he said. :D
|
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 5020568)
It's just my way. Imagine me to be some kind of awful cross between Jack Dee and Jimmy carr, then you've pretty much got me...
:D S :) |
Re: The first mistake in the bible!
Originally Posted by arkon
(Post 5020657)
So IPom, did you watch that Pat Condell stuff I linked to? Worth a watch if you didn't, quite funny actually.
No I haven't got round to it Arkon. Too busy chuck. Children on school holidays plus studying. It's a bit mad. If I get any spare time (:unsure:) I will do. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:49 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.